Seismic response analysis of multidrum classical columns

Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics

Volumn 34, Issue 10, 2005, Pages 1243-1270

  Konstantinidis, Dimitrios ^a   Makris, Nicos ^a,b  

^a 109 McLaughlin Hall   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PATRAS   (Greece)

Author keywords

Earthquake engineering; Multidrum classical columns; Rocking; Seismic response; Sliding

Indexed keywords

COLUMNS (STRUCTURAL); COMPUTER SOFTWARE; EARTHQUAKES; ELECTRIC TRANSFORMERS; FRICTION; RETROFITTING;

GROUND MOTION; MONOLITHIC COLUMNS; MULTIDRUM COLUMNS; SEISMIC STABILITY;

SEISMOLOGY;

CLASSIC PERIOD; COLUMN; EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING; GROUND MOTION; NUMERICAL MODEL; SEISMIC RESPONSE;

EID: 23044486650     PISSN: 00988847     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/eqe.478     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Sinopoli A. Kinematic approach in the impact problem of rigid bodies. Applied Mechanics Reviews (ASME) 1989; 42(11):S233-S244.
2. Psycharis IN. Dynamic behaviour of rocking two-block assemblies. Earthquake Enaineerina and Structural Dynamics 1990; 19:555-575.
3. Papantonopoulos CL. The articulated structural system: studying the earthquake response of a classical temple. Structural Repair and Maintenance of Historical Buildings, STREMA, Bath, U.K., 1993; 483-489.
4. Psycharis IN, Papastamatiou DY, Alexandris AP. Parametric investigation of the stability of classical columns under harmonic and earthquake excitations. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2000; 29(8):1093-1109.
5. Mouzakis HP, Psycharis IN, Papastamatiou DY, Carydis PG, Papantonopoulos C, Zambas C. Experimental investigation of the earthquake response of a model of a marble classical column. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2002; 31(9):1681-1698.
6. Papantonopoulos C, Psycharis IN, Papastamatiou DY, Lemos JV, Mouzakis H. Numerical prediction of the earthquake response of classical columns using the distinct element method. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2002; 31(9):1699-1717.
7. Psycharis IN, Lemos JV, Papastamatiou DY, Zambas C. Numerical study of the seismic behaviour or a part of the Parthenon Pronaos. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2003; 32(13):2063-2084.
8. Cundall PA. Formulation of a three-dimensional distinct element model. Part I: a scheme to detect and represent contacts in a system composed of many polyhedral blocks. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mineral Sciences 1988; 25:107-116.
9. Bolt BA. The San Fernando Valley, California, earthquake of February 9, 1971: data on seismic hazards. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 1971; 61:501-510.
10. Iwan WD, Chen XD. Important near-field ground motion data from the Landers earthquake. Proceedings of the 10th European Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Vienna, Austria, 1994; 229-234.
11. Hall JF, Heaton TH, Halling MW, Wald DJ. Near-source ground motion and its effects on flexible buildings. Earthquake Spectra 1995; 11 (4):569-605.
12. Bertero VV, Mahin SA, Herrera RA. Aseismic design implications of near-fault San Fernando earthquake records. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 1978; 6(1):31-42.
13. Sucuoglu H, Erberik MA, Yucemen MS. Influence of peak ground velocity on seismic failure probability. Proceedings of the 4th International Conference of the European Association for Structural Dynamics, EURODYN '99, Prague, Czech Republic, 1999.
14. Makris N, Black CJ. Dimensional analysis of inelastic structures subjected to near-fault ground motions. Report No. EERC 2003-05, Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley, CA, 2003.
15. Makris N, Black CJ. Dimensional analysis of rigid-plastic and elastoplastic structures under pulse-type excitations. Journal of Engineering Mechanics (ASCE) 2004; 130(9):1006-1018.
16. Makris N, Black CJ. Evaluation of peak ground velocity as a 'good' intensity measure for near-source ground motions. Journal of Engineering Mechanics (ASCE) 2004; 130(9):1032-1044.
17. Makris N, Roussos Y. Rocking response of rigid blocks under near-source ground motions. Géotechnique 2000; 50(3):243-262.
18. Veletsos AS, Newmark NM, Chelepati CV. Deformation spectra for elastic and elasto-plastic systems subjected to ground shock and earthquake motions. Proceedings of the 3rd World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Wellington, New Zealand, vol. 2, 1965; 663-682.
19. Makris N. Rigidity-plasticity-viscosity: can electrorheological dampers protect base-isolated structures from near-source ground motions? Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 1997; 26 (5):571-591.
20. Makris N, Chang S-P. Effect of viscous, viscoplastic and friction damping on the response of seismic isolated structures. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2000; 29(1):85-107.
21. Alavi B, Krawinkler H. Effects of near-fault ground motions on frame-structures. Report No. 138, The John A. Blume Earthquake Engineering Center, Stanford University, CA, 2001.
22. Mavroeidis GP, Papageorgiou AS. A mathematical representation of near-fault ground motions. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 2003; 93(3):1099-1131.
23. Makris N, Psychogios T. Static and Dynamic Analysis of the Columns of the NE Corner of the Temple of Zeus at Nemea. American School of Classical Studies, Athens, Greece, 2004 (in Greek).
24. Drakopoulos J. Seismicity and Seismic Risk Studies in the Area of Archaea Nemea, Korinthia. American School of Classical Studies, Athens, Greece, 1983.
25. Makris N, Konstantinidis D. The rocking spectrum and the limitations of practical design methodologies. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2003; 32(2):265-289.
26. Working Model™. User's manual. MSC Software Corporation: San Mateo, CA, 2000.
27. Stewart D. Rigid-body dynamics with friction and impact. SIAM Review 2000; 42(1):3-39.
28. Newmark NM. Effects of earthquakes on dams and embankments. Fifth Rankine Lecture. Géotechnique 1965; 15:139-160.
29. Younis C, Tadjbakhsh G. Response of sliding rigid structure to base excitation. Journal of Engineering Mechanics (ASCE) 1984; 110 (3):417-432.
30. Wen Y-K. Approximate method for nonlinear random vibration. Journal of Engineering Mechanics Division (ASCE) 1975; 102(EM4):389-401.
31. MATLAB. High-performance Language Software for Technical Computation. The MathWorks, Inc.: Natick, MA, 2002.
32. Konstantinidis D, Makris N. Experimental and analytical seismic response of building contents. Report No. PEER-05/XX, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley, CA, 2004 (in preparation).
33. Scalia A, Sumbatyan MA. Slide rotation of rigid bodies subjected to a horizontal ground motion. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 1996; 25(10):1139-1149.
34. Shenton III HW. Criteria for initiation of slide, rock, and slide-rock rigid body modes. Journal of Engineering Mechanics (ASCE) 1996; 122:690-693.
35. Zhang J, Makris N. Rocking response of free-standing blocks under cycloidal pulses. Journal of Engineering Mechanics (ASCE) 2001; 127(5):473-483.
36. Yim CK, Chopra AK, Penzien J. Rocking response of rigid blocks to earthquakes. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 1980; 8:565-587.
37. Housner GW. The behaviour of inverted pendulum structures during earthquakes. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 1963; 53(2):404-417.
38. Orlandos AK. Construction Materials of the Ancient Greeks, vol. 2. Archeological Society of Athens: Greece, 1958 (in Greek).