Survival and selection of migrating salmon from capture-recapture models with individual traits

Ecological Applications

Volumn 15, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 1427-1439

  Zabel, Richard W ^a   Wagner, Tyler ^b,c   Congleton, James L ^b   Smith, Steven G ^a   Williams, John G ^a  

^a NORTHWEST FISHERIES SCIENCE CENTER   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF IDAHO   (United States)

^c MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Behavioral variability; Capture recapture; Chinook salmon; Individual covariates; Mark recapture; Model averaging; Oncorhynchus mykiss; Oncorhynchus tshawytscha; PIT tag; Selection; Steelhead; Survival

Indexed keywords

MARK-RECAPTURE METHOD; POPULATION DYNAMICS; SALMONID;

ANIMALIA; ONCORHYNCHUS MYKISS; ONCORHYNCHUS TSHAWYTSCHA; SALMONIDAE;

EID: 23044474368     PISSN: 10510761     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1890/04-0940     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Brett, J. R. 1964. The respiratory metabolism and swimming performance of young sockeye salmon. Journal of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada 21:1183-1226.
2. Budy, P., G. P. Thiede, N. Bouwes, C. E. Petrosky, and H. Schaller. 2002. Evidence linking delayed mortality of Snake River salmon to their early hydrosystem experience. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 22:35-51.
3. Burnham, K. P., and D. R. Anderson. 2002. Model selection and inference - a practical information-theoretic approach. Second edition. Springer-Verlag, New York. New York, USA.
4. Burnham, K. P., D. R. Anderson, G. C. White, C. Brownie, and K. H. Pollock. 1987. Design and analysis methods for fish survival experiments based on release-recapture. American Fisheries Society Monograph Number 5.
5. Clobert, J. 1995. Capture-recapture and evolutionary ecology: a difficult wedding? Journal of Applied Statistics 22:989-1008.
6. Cormack, R. M. 1964. Estimates of survival from the sighting of marked animals. Biometrika 51:429-438.
7. Coutant, C. C., and R. R. Whitney. 2000. Fish behavior in relation to passage through hydropower turbines: a review. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 129:351-380.
8. Endler, J. A. 1986. Natural selection in the wild. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, USA.
9. Hagen, N. T. 1996. Tagging sea urchins: a new technique for individual identification. Aquaculture 139:271-284.
10. Harmon, J. R., D. M. Marsh, N. N. Paasch, K. L. Thomas, K. W. McIntyre, B. P. Sandford, and G. M. Matthews. 2000. Research related to transportation of juvenile salmonids on the Columbia and Snake Rivers, 1999. Fish Ecology Division, Northwest Fisheries Science Center, National Marine Fisheries Service, Seattle, Washington, USA.
11. Hoar, W. S. 1976. Smolt transformation: evolution, behavior, and physiology. Journal of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada 33:1233-1252.
12. Hoffmann, A., and J. R. Skalski. 1995. Inferential properties of an individual-based survival model using release-recapture data: sample size, validity and power. Journal of Applied Statistics 22:579-595.
13. Hosmer, D. W., and S. Lemeshow. 2000. Applied logistic regression. Second edition. John Wiley, New York, New York, USA.
14. Janzen, F. J., J. K. Tucker, and G. L. Paukstis. 2000. Experimental analysis of an early life-history stage: selection on size of hatchling turtles. Ecology 81:2290-2304.
15. Johnson, J. B., and K. S. Omland. 2004. Model selection in ecology and evolution. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 19:101-108.
16. Jolly, G. M. 1965. Explicit estimates from capture-recapture data with both death and immigration - stochastic model. Biometrika 52:225-247.
17. Kingsolver, J. G., H. E. Hoekstra, J. M. Hoekstra, D. Berrigan, C. E. Hill, A. Hoang, P. Gilbert, and P. Beerli. 2001. The strength of phenotypic selection in natural populations. American Naturalist 157:245-261.
18. Kingsolver, J. G., and S. G. Smith. 1995. Estimating selection on quantitative traits using capture-recapture data. Evolution 49:384-388.
19. Lady, J., P. Westhagen, and J. R. Skalski. 2001. Survival under Propotional Hazards (SURPH 2.1). Columbia Basin Research, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA. 〈http://www.cbr.washington.edu/ paramEst/SURPH/Manual/index.html〉
20. Lebreton, J.-D. 1995. The future of population dynamic studies using marked individuals: a statistician's perspective. Journal of Applied Statistics 22:1009-1030.
21. Lebreton, J.-D., K. P. Burnham, J. Clobert, and D. R. Anderson. 1992. Modeling survival and testing biological hypotheses using marked animals: a unified approach with case studies. Ecological Monographs 62:67-118.
22. MacKenzie, D. I., and W. L. Kendall. 2002. How should detection probability be incorporated into estimates of relative abundance? Ecology 83:2387-2393.
23. Marsh, D. M., J. R. Harmon, N. N. Paasch, K. L. Thomas, K. W. McIntyre, B. P. Sandford, and G. E. Matthews. 2001. Research related to transportation of juvenile salmonids on the Columbia and Snake Rivers, 2000. Fish Ecology Division, Northwest Fisheries Science Center. National Marine Fisheries Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Seattle, Washington, USA.
24. Mazerolle, M. J. 2003. Detrimental effects of peat mining on amphibian abundance and species richness in bogs. Biological Conservation 113:215-223.
25. McDonald, D. G., W. J. McFarlane, and C. L. Milligan. 1998. Anaerobic capacity and swim performance of juvenile salmonids. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 55:1198-1207.
26. McPherson, R. J., R. W. Arnold, L. M. Armstrong, and C. J. Schwarz. 2003. Estimating the nest success rate and the number of nests initiated by radiomarked mallards. Journal of Wildlife Management 67:843-851.
27. Mood, A. M., F. A. Graybill, and D. C. Boes. 1974. Introduction to the theory of statistics. Third edition. McGraw-Hill, New York, New York, USA.
28. Peake, S., and R. S. McKinley. 1998. A re-evaluation of swimming performance in juvenile salmonids relative to downstream migration. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 55:682-687.
29. Pinder, L. J., and J. G. Eales. 1969. Seasonal buoyancy changes in atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) parr and smolt. Journal of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada 26:2093-2100.
30. Pollock, K. H. 2002. The use of auxiliary variables in capture-recapture modeling: an overview. Journal of Applied Statistics 29:85-102.
31. Prentice, E. F. T. A. Flagg, and C. S. McCutcheon. 1990a. Feasibility of using implantable passive integrated transponder (PIT) tags in salmonids. American Fisheries Society Symposium 7:317-322.
32. Prentice, E. F., T. A. Flagg, C. S. McCutcheon, and D. F. Brastow. 1990b. PIT-tag monitoring systems for hydroelectric dams and fish hatcheries. American Fisheries Society Symposium 7:323-334.
33. Roussel, J.-M., A. Haro, and R. A. Cunjak. 2000. Field test of a new method for tracking small fishes in shallow rivers using passive integrated transponder (PIT) technology. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 57:1326-1329.
34. Saunders, R. L. 1965. Adjustments of buoyancy in young Atlantic salmon and brook trout by changes in swim bladder volume. Journal of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada 22:335-352.
35. Seber, G. A. F. 1965. A note on the multiple recapture census. Biometrika 52:249-259.
36. Seber, G. A. F., and C. J. Schwarz. 2002. Capture-recapture: before and after EURING 2000. Journal of Applied Statistics 29:5-18.
37. Skalski, J. R., S. G. Smith, R. N. Iwamoto, J. G. Williams, and A. Hoffmann. 1998. Use of passive integrated transponder tags to estimate surival of migrant juvenile salmonids in the Snake and Columbia Rivers. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Seciences 55:1484-1493.
38. Waples, R. S. 1995. Evolutionarily significant units and the conservation of biological diversity under the Endangered Species Act. American Fisheries Society Symposium 17:8-27.
39. White, G. C., and K. P. Burnham. 1999. Program MARK: survival estimation from populations of marked animals. Bird Study 46(Supplement):120-138.
40. Williams, J. G., S. G. Smith, R. W. Zabel, W. D. Muir, M. D. Scheuerell, B. P. Sandford, D. M. Marsh, R. McNatt, and S. Achord. 2005. Effects of the Federal Columbia River Power System on salmon populations. NOAA Technical Memorandum, NOAA-TM-NMFS-NWFSC-63, Seattle, Washington, USA. 〈http://www.nwfsc.noaa.gov/publications/techmemos/index.cfm〉
41. Wright, I. E., S. D. Wright, and J. M. Sweat. 1998. Use of passive integrated transponder (PIT) tags to identify manatees (Trichechus manatus latirostris). Marine Mammal Science 14:641-645.
42. Zabel, R. W. 2002. Using "travel time" data to characterize the behavior of migrating animals. American Naturalist 4:372-387.
43. Zabel, R. W., and S. Achord. 2004. Relating size of juveniles to survival within and among populations of chinook salmon. Ecology 85:795-806.
44. Zabel, R. W., and J. G. Williams. 2002. Selective mortality in chinook salmon: what is the role of human disturbance? Ecological Applications 12:173-183.