The locus of semantic priming in RSVP target search

Memory and Cognition

Volumn 33, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 241-248

  Davenport, Jodi L ^a   Potter, Mary C ^a  

^a MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ATTENTION; CONTROLLED STUDY; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MEMORY CONSOLIDATION; SEMANTIC MEMORY; STIMULUS RESPONSE; VISUAL SYSTEM; WORD LIST RECALL; WORD RECOGNITION; EYE FIXATION; LINGUISTICS; REACTION TIME; SEMANTICS; TIME;

FIXATION, OCULAR; HUMANS; REACTION TIME; SEMANTICS; TIME FACTORS; VOCABULARY;

EID: 23044465309     PISSN: 0090502X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03195313     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. BROADBENT, D. E., & BROADBENT, M. H. (1987). From detection to identification: Response to multiple targets in rapid serial visual presentation. Perception & Psychophysics, 42, 105-113.
2. COHEN, J. (1977). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (rev. ed.). New York: Academic Press.
3. CHUN, M. M., & POTTER, M. C. (1995). A two-stage model for multiple target detection in rapid serial visual presentation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 21, 109-127.
4. DARK, V. J., VOCHATZER, K. G., & VANVOORHIS, B. A. (1996). Semantic and spatial components of selective attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 22, 63-81.
5. HUNT, S. M. J. (1994). MacProbe: A Macintosh-based experimenter's workstation for the cognitive sciences. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 26, 345-351.
6. JOLICŒUR, P., & DELL'ACQUA, R. (1998). The demonstration of short-term consolidation. Cognitive Psychology, 36, 138-202.
7. JUOLA, J. F., DUVURU, P., & PETERSON, M. S. (2000). Priming effects in attentional gating. Memory & Cognition, 28, 224-235.
8. LAWRENCE, D. H. (1971). Two studies of visual search for word targets with controlled rates of presentation. Perception & Psychophysics, 10, 85-89.
9. LUCK, S. J., VOGEL, E. K., & SHAPIRO, K. L. (1996). Word meanings can be accessed but not reported during the attentional blink. Nature, 383, 616-618.
10. MAKI, W. S., FRIGEN, K., & PAULSON, K. (1997). Associative priming by targets and distractors during rapid serial visual presentation: Does word meaning survive the attentional blink? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 23, 1014-1034.
11. MARTENS, S., WOLTERS, G., & VAN RAAMSDONK, M. (2002). Blinks of the mind: Memory effects of attentional processes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 28, 1275-1287.
12. NEELY, J. H. (1991). Semantic priming effects in visual word recognition: A selective review of current findings and theories. In D. Besner & G. W. Humphreys (Eds.), Basic processes in reading: Visual word recognition (pp. 264-336). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
13. NELSON, D. L., MCEVOY, C. L., & SCHREIBER, T. A. (1998). The University of South Florida word association, rhyme, and word fragment norms. Available at http://www.usf.edu/FreeAssociation/.
14. POTTER, M. C. (1976). Short-term conceptual memory for pictures. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory, 2, 509-522.
15. POTTER, M. C. (in press). Competition for attention in space and time: The first 200 ms. In H. Ogmen & B. G. Breitmeyer (Eds.), The first half second: The microgenesis and temporal dynamics of unconscious and conscious visual processes. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
16. POTTER, M. C., CHUN, M. M., BANKS, B. S., & MUCKENHOUPT, M. (1998). Two attentional deficits in serial target search: The visual attentional blink and an amodal task-switch deficit. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 24, 979-992.
17. POTTER, M. C., MORYADAS, A., ABRAMS, I., & NOEL, A. (1993). Word perception and misperception in context. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 19, 3-22.
18. POTTER, M. C., STAUB, A., & O'CONNOR, D. H. (2002). The time course of competition for attention: Attention is initially labile. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 28, 1149-1162.
19. RAYMOND, J. E., SHAPIRO, K. L., & ARNELL, K. M. (1992). Temporary suppression of visual processing in an RSVP task: An attentional blink? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 18, 849-860.
20. ROLKE, B., HEIL, M., STREB, J., & HENNIGHAUSEN, E. (2001). Missed prime words within the attentional blink evoke an N400 semantic priming effect. Psychophysiology, 38, 165-174.
21. SHAPIRO, K. L., DRIVER, J., WARD, R., & SORENSEN, R. E. (1997). Priming from the attentional blink: A failure to extract visual tokens but not visual types. Psychological Science, 8, 95-100.
22. SHAPIRO, K. L., RAYMOND, J. E., & ARNELL, K. M. (1994). Attention to visual pattern information produces the attentional blink in RSVP. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 20, 357-371.
23. SHIH, S.-I. (2000). Recall of two visual targets embedded in RSVP streams of distractors depends on their temporal and spatial relationship. Perception & Psychophysics, 62, 1348-1355.
24. VOGEL, E. K., LUCK, S. J., & SHAPIRO, K. L. (1998). Electrophysiological evidence for a postperceptual locus of suppression during the attentional blink. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 24, 1656-1674.
25. WEICHSELGARTNER, E., & SPERLING, G. (1987). Dynamics of automatic and controlled visual attention. Science, 238, 778-780.