An upstream flux-splitting finite-volume scheme for 2D shallow water equations

International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids

Volumn 48, Issue 10, 2005, Pages 1149-1174

  Lai, Jihn Sung ^a   Lin, Gwo Fong ^b   Guo, Wen Dar ^a  

^a NATIONAL TAIWAN UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^b NATIONAL TAIWAN UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

Artificially upstream flux vector splitting method; Finite volume method; Riemann problem; Shallow water equations

Indexed keywords

HYDRAULICS; PROBLEM SOLVING; VECTORS; WIND;

FLUX-SPLITTING FINITE-VOLUME; NUMERICAL FLUX FUNCTIONS; WATER EQUATIONS;

FLUIDS;

FINITE VOLUME TECHNIQUE;

EID: 23044455430     PISSN: 02712091     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/fld.974     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Hirsch C. Numerical Computation of Internal and External Flows, vol. 2. Wiley: Chichester, 1990.
2. Toro EF. Riemann Solvers and Numerical Methods for Fluid Dynamics. Springer: Berlin, 1997.
3. Roe PL. Approximate Riemann solvers, parameter vectors, and difference schemes. Journal of Computational Physics 1981; 43:357-372.
4. Osher S, Solomone F. Upwind difference schemes for hyperbolic systems of conservation laws. Mathematics and Computers in Simulation 1982; 38:339-374.
5. Steger JL, Warming RF. Flux vector splitting of the inviscid gas dynamic equations with application to finite difference methods. Journal of Computational Physics 1981; 40:263-293.
6. Zhao DH, Shen HW, Tabios GQ, Lai JS, Tan WY. Finite-volume two-dimensional unsteady-flow model flow river basins. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering 1994; 120(12):863-882.
7. Wan Q, Wan H, Zhou C, Wu Y. Simulating the hydraulic characteristics of the lower Yellow River by the finite-volume technique. Hydrological Processes 2002; 16(14):2767-2769.
8. Alcrudo F, Garcia-Navarro P. A high-resolution Godunov-type scheme in finite volumes for the 2D shallow water equations. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids 1993; 16:489-505.
9. Anastasiou K, Chan CT. Solution of the 2D shallow water equations using the finite volume method on unstructured triangular meshes. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids 1997; 24: 1225-1245.
10. Sleigh PA, Gaskell PH, Berzins M, Wright NG. An unstructured finite-volume algorithm for predicting flow in rivers and estuaries. Computers and Fluids 1998; 27(4):479-508.
11. Tseng MH. Explicit finite volume non-oscillatory schemes for 2D transient free-surface flows. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids 1999; 30:831-843.
12. Tseng MH, Chu CR. Two-dimensional shallow water flows simulation using TVD-MacCormack scheme. Journal of Hydraulic Research 2000; 38 (2):123-131.
13. Brufau P, Garcia-Navarro P. Two-dimensional dam break flow simulation. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids 2000; 33: 35-57.
14. Mingham CG, Causon DM. High-resolution finite-volume method for shallow water flows. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering 1998; 124 (6):605-614.
15. Hu K, Mingham CG, Causon DM. A bore-capturing finite volume method for open-channel flows. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids 1998; 28:1241-1261.
16. Causon DM, Mingham CG, Ingram DM. Advances in calculation methods for supercritical flow in spillway channels. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering 1999; 125(10):1039-1050.
17. Valiani A, Caleffi V, Zanni A. Case study: Malpasset Dam-break simulation using a two-dimensional finite volume method. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering 2002; 28(5):460-472.
18. Zoppou C, Roberts S. Catastrophic collapse of water supply reservoirs in urban areas. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering 1999; 125 (7):686-695.
19. Zhao DH, Shen HW, Lai JS, Tabios GQ. Approximate Riemann solvers in FVM for 2D hydraulic shock wave modeling. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering 1996; 122(12):692-702.
20. Lin GF, Lai JS, Guo WD. Finite-volume component-wise TVD schemes for 2D shallow water equations. Advances in Water Resources 2003; 26 (8):861-873.
21. Erduran KS, Kutija V, Hewett CJM. Performance of finite volume solutions to the shallow water equations with shock-capturing schemes. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids 2002; 40: 1237-1273.
22. Sun M, Takayama K. An artificially upstream flux vector splitting scheme for the Euler equations. Journal of Computational Physics 2003; 189:305-329.
23. Tan WY. Shallow Water Hydrodynamics, Elsevier: New York, 1992.
24. Toro EF. Shock-capturing Methods for Free-surface Shallow Water Flows. Wiley: New York, 2001.
25. Wada Y, Lious MS. An accurate and robust flux splitting scheme for shock and contact discontinuities. SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing 1997; 18(3):633-657.
26. Stoker JJ. Water Waves: Mathematical Theory with Applications. Wiley-Interscience: Singapore, 1958.
27. LeVeque RJ. Finite Volume Methods for Hyperbolic Problems. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, U.K., 2002.
28. Hager WH, Schwalt M, Jimenez O, Chaudry MH. Supercritical flow near an abrupt wall deflection. Journal of Hydraulic Research 1994; 32 (1):103-118.
29. Roache PJ. Verification and Validation in Computational Science and Engineering. Hermosa Publishers: Albuquerque, New Mexico, 1998.
30. Sorares S, Sillen X, Zech Y. Dam-break flow through sharp bends. Physical models and 2d boltzmann model validation. European Commission, IBSN 92-828-7108-8, 1999.