An artificially upstream flux vector splitting scheme for the Euler equations

Journal of Computational Physics

Volumn 189, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 305-329

  Sun, M ^a   Takayama, K ^a  

^a TOHOKU UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EIGENVALUES AND EIGENFUNCTIONS; VECTORS; WAVE PROPAGATION;

ARTIFICIAL WAVES; ARTIFICIALLY UPSTREAM FLUX VECTOR SPLITTING; CONTACT DISCONTINUITIES; EULER'S EQUATION; FAST WAVE SPEED; FLUX VECTOR SPLITTING SCHEMES; FLUX VECTORS; MULTI DIMENSIONAL; TWO WAVES; WAVESPEED;

EULER EQUATIONS;

EID: 0037777628     PISSN: 00219991     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0021-9991(03)00212-2     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. D.L. Brown, M.L. Minion, Performance of under-resolved two-dimensional incompressible flow simulations, J. Comput. Phys. 122 (1995) 165.
2. S.F. Davis, Simplified second-order Godonov-type methods, SIAM J. Sci. Statist. Comput. 9 (1988) 445.
3. B. Einfeldt, On Godunov-type methods for gas dynamics, SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 25 (1988) 294.
4. B. Einfeldt, C.D. Munz, P.L. Roe, B. Sjogreen, On Godunov-type methods near low densities, J. Comput. Phys. 92 (1991) 273.
5. B. Engquist, S. Osher, One-sided difference approximations for nonlinear conservation laws, Math. Comput. 36 (1981) 321.
6. A. Harten, P.D. Lax, B. van Leer, On upstream differencing and Godunov-type schemes for hyperbolic conservation laws, SIAM Rev. 25 (1983) 35.
7. A. Jameson, Positive schemes and shock modeling for compressible flows, Intl. J. Numr. Methods Fluids 20 (1995) 743.
8. +, J. Comput. Phys. 129 (1996) 364.
9. M.S. Liou, C.J. Steffen, A new flux splitting scheme, J. Comput. Phys 107 (1993) 23.
10. M.S. Liou, Mass flux schemes and connection to shock instability, J. Comput. Phys. 160 (2000) 623.
11. M. Pandolfi, D. D'Ambrosio, Numerical instabilities in upwind methods: analysis and cures for the "Carbuncle" phenomenon, J. Comput. Phys. 166 (2001) 271.
12. J.J. Quirk, A contribution to the great Riemann solver debate, Intl. J. Numer. Methods Fluids 18 (1994) 555.
13. S.V. Rao, S.M. Deshpande, A class of efficient kinetic upwind methods for compressible flows, Report 91 FM 11, Indian Institute of Science, 1991.
14. P.L. Roe, Approximate Riemann solvers, parameter vectors, and difference schemes, J. Comput. Phys. 43 (1981) 357.
15. I.V. Sokolov, E.V. Timofeev, J. Sakai, K. Takayama, Artificial wind - a new framework to construct simple and efficient upwind shock-capturing schemes, J. Comput. Phys. 181 (2002) 354.
16. J.L. Steger, R.F. Warming, Flux vector splitting of the inviscid gasdynamic equations with applications to finite difference methods, J. Comput. Phys. 40 (1981) 263.
17. M. Sun, K. Takayama, Conservative smoothing on an adaptive quadrilateral grid, J. Comput. Phys. 150 (1999) 143.
18. E.F. Toro, Riemann Solvers and Numerical Methods for Fluid Dynamics, second ed., Springer, Berlin, 1999.
19. E.F. Toro, M. Spruce, W. Speares, Restoration of the contact surface in the HLL-Riemann solver, Shock Waves 4 (1994) 25.
20. B. van Leer, Towards the ultimate conservative difference scheme. III. Upstream-centered finite-difference schemes for ideal compressible flow, J. Comput. Phys. 23 (1977) 263.
21. B. van Leer, Towards the ultimate conservative difference scheme. IV. A new approach to numerical convection, J. Comput. Phys. 23 (1977) 276.