Prediction of mechanical properties of human trabecular bone by electrical measurements

Physiological Measurement

Volumn 26, Issue 2, 2005, Pages

  Sierpowska, J ^a   Hakulinen, M A ^a   Toyras J ^b   Day, J S ^c   Weinans, H ^c   Jurvelin, J S ^a,b   Lappalainen, R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EASTERN FINLAND   (Finland)

^b KUOPIO UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Finland)

^c ERASMUS MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Bone; Conductivity; Mechanical properties; Permittivity; Ultimate strength; Young's modulus

Indexed keywords

BONE; HIP PROSTHESES; MECHANICAL TESTING; PERMITTIVITY; STRAIN; YIELD STRESS;

CONDUCTIVITY; DIELECTRIC PARAMETERS; DISSIPATION FACTORS; ELECTRICAL AND DIELECTRIC PROPERTIES; ELECTRICAL PARAMETER; HUMAN TRABECULAR BONE; MEASUREMENTS OF; TRABECULAR BONES; ULTIMATE STRENGTH; YOUNG MODULUS;

ELASTIC MODULI;

BONE STRENGTH; BONE STRESS; CONDUCTANCE; CONFERENCE PAPER; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DIELECTRIC CONSTANT; ELECTRICAL PARAMETERS; FEMUR; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; IMPEDANCE; MUSCULOSKELETAL SYSTEM PARAMETERS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SAMPLING; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; TIBIA; TRABECULAR BONE; YOUNG MODULUS; ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BIOMECHANICS; BODY COMPOSITION; BONE DENSITY; CADAVER; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; ELASTICITY; EVALUATION; IMPEDANCE PLETHYSMOGRAPHY; IN VITRO STUDY; METHODOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; STATISTICS; VALIDATION STUDY;

DIAGNOSTIC AGENT;

ALGORITHMS; BIOMECHANICS; BODY COMPOSITION; BONE DENSITY; CADAVER; COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DIAGNOSIS, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; ELASTICITY; ELECTRIC IMPEDANCE; FEMUR; HUMANS; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; PLETHYSMOGRAPHY, IMPEDANCE; STATISTICS; TIBIA;

EID: 23044451423     PISSN: 09673334     EISSN: 09673334     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1088/0967-3334/26/2/012     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (31)

1. Behari J 1991 Solid state bone behaviour Prog. Biopliys. Mol. Biol. 56 1-41
2. Chakkalakal D A, Johnson M W, Harper R A and Katz J L 1980 Dielectric properties of fluid-saturated bone IEEE. Trans. Biomed. Eng. 27 95-100
3. Cochran G V, Pawluk R J and Bassett C A 1968 Electromechanical characteristics of bone under physiologic moisture conditions Clin. Orthop. 58 249-70
4. De Mercato G and Garcia-Sanchez F J 1988 Dielectric properties of fluid-saturated bone: a comparison between diaphysis and epiphysis Med. Biol. Eng. Comput. 26 313-6
5. Demarest K R 1998 Engineering Electromagnetics (New Jersey: Prentice Hall)
6. Foster K R and Schwan H P 1989 Dielectric properties of tissues and biological materials: a critical review Crit. Rev. Biomed. Eng. 17 25-104
7. Gabriel C, Gabriel S and Corthout E 1996 The dielectric properties of biological tissues: I. Literature survey Phys. Med. Biol. 41 2231-49
8. Hastings G W and Mahmud F A 1988 Electrical effects in bone J. Biomed. Eng. 10 515-21
9. Hvid I, Bentzen S M, Linde F, Mosekilde L and Pongsoipetch B 1989 X-ray quantitative computed tomography: the relations to physical properties of proximal tibial trabecular bone specimens J. Biomech. 22 837-44
10. Jiang Y, Zhao J, Augat P, Ouyang X, Lu Y, Majumdar S and Genant H K 1998 Trabecular bone mineral and calculated structure of human bone specimens scanned by peripheral quantitative computed tomography: relation to biomechanical properties J. Bone Miner. Res. 13 1783-90
11. Keaveny T M, Morgan E F, Niebur G L and Yeh O C 2001 Biomechanics of trabecular bone Annu. Rev. Biomed. Eng. 3 307-33
12. Kosterich J D, Foster K R and Pollack S R 1983 Dielectric permittivity and electrical conductivity of fluid saturated bone IEEE. Trans. Biomed. Eng. 30 81-6
13. Linde F and Sorensen H C 1993 The effect of different storage methods on the mechanical properties of trabecular bone J. Biomech. 26 1249-52
14. Lotz J C, Gerhart T N and Hayes W C 1990 Mechanical properties of trabecular bone from the proximal femur: a quantitative CT study J. Comput. Assist. Tomogr. 14 107-14
15. Moore T L A and Gibson L J 2002 Microdamage accumulation in bovine trabecular bone in uniaxial compression J. Biomech. Eng. 124 63-71
16. Nicholson P H and Bouxsein M L 2000 Quantitative ultrasound does not reflect mechanically induced damage in human cancellous bone J. Bone Miner. Res. 15 2467-72
17. Rajapakse C S, Thomsen J S, Espinoza Ortiz J S, Wimalawansa S J, Ebbesen E N, Mosekilde L and Gunaratne G H 2004 An expression relating breaking stress and density of trabecular bone J. Biomech. 37 1241-9
18. Reddy G N and Saha S 1984 Electrical and dielectric properties of wet bone as a function of frequency IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 31 296-303
19. Saha S, Reddy G N and Albright J A 1984 Factors affecting the measurement of bone impedance Med. Biol. Eng. Comput. 22 123-9
20. Saha S and Williams P A 1988 Effect of various storage methods on the dielectric properties of compact bone Med. Biol. Eng. Comput. 26 199-202
21. Saha S and Williams P A 1989 Electric and dielectric properties of wet human cancellous bone as a function of frequency Ann. Biomed. Eng. 17 143-58
22. Saha S and Williams P A 1995 Comparison of the electrical and dielectric behavior of wet human cortical and cancellous bone tissue from the distal tibia J. Orthop. Res. 13 524-32
23. Sierpowska J, Toyras J, Hakulinen M A, Saarakkala S, Jurvelin J S and Lappalainen R 2003 Electrical and dielectric properties of bovine trabecular bone - relationships with mechanical properties and mineral density Phys. Med. Biol 48 775-86
24. Singh S 1987 Electric properties of wet whole bone J. Bioelectr. 6 169-80
25. Singh S and Katz J L 1988 Electromechanical properties of bone: a review J. Bioelectr. 7 219
26. Singh S and Saha S 1984 Electrical properties of bone. A review Clin. Orthop. 249-71
27. Skinner C, Kulkarni V, Aschcroft G and Hutchison J 2001 Early impedance changes following corticotomy and distraction in the Ilizarov technique Proc. XI Int. Conf. Electrical Bio-Impedance (Oslo) pp 101-4
28. Swanson G T and Lafferty J F 1972 Electrical properties of bone as a function of age, immobilization and vibration J. Biomech. 5 261-6
29. Töyräs J, Nieminen M T, Kröger H and Jurvelin J S 2002 Bone mineral density, ultrasound velocity, and broadband attenuation predict mechanical properties of trabecular bone differently Bone 31 503-7
30. Turner C H and Burr D B 1993 Basic biomechanical measurements of bone: a tutorial Bone 14 595-608
31. Williams P A and Saha S 1996 The electrical and dielectric properties of human bone tissue and their relationship with density and bone mineral content Ann. Biomed. Eng. 24 222-33