Effect of interocular delay on disparity-selective V1 neurons: Relationship to stereoacuity and the Pulfrich effect

Journal of Neurophysiology

Volumn 94, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 1541-1553

  Read, Jenny C A ^a,b   Cumming, Bruce G ^a  

^a NATIONAL EYE INSTITUTE   (United States)

^b NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL BEHAVIOR; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; BRAIN NERVE CELL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEPTH PERCEPTION; INTEROCULAR TRANSFER; MALE; MONKEY; NERVE CONDUCTION; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY; PULFRICH EFFECT; STEREOSCOPIC VISION; STRIATE CORTEX; STROBOSCOPY; THEORY; VISUAL ACUITY; VISUAL STIMULATION;

ACTION POTENTIALS; ANIMALS; DEPTH PERCEPTION; MACACA; MALE; NEURONS; ORIENTATION; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PSYCHOPHYSICS; REACTION TIME; TIME FACTORS; VISION DISPARITY; VISION, BINOCULAR; VISUAL ACUITY; VISUAL CORTEX; VISUAL PATHWAYS; WAKEFULNESS;

EID: 23044449458     PISSN: 00223077     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1152/jn.01177.2004     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Adelson EH and Bergen JR. Spatiotemporal energy models for the perception of motion. J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis 2: 284-299, 1985.
2. Anzai A, Ohzawa I, and Freeman RD. Joint-encoding of motion and depth by visual cortical neurons: neural basis of the Pulfrich effect. Nat Neurosci 4: 513-518, 2001.
3. Auerbach E, Beller AJ, Henkes HE, and Goldhaber G. Electric potentials of retina and cortex of cats evoked by monocular and binocular photic stimulation. Vision Res 1: 166-170, 1961.
4. Bridge H and Cumming BG. Responses of macaque V1 neurons to binocular orientation differences. J Neurosci 21: 7293-7302, 2001.
5. Burr DC and Ross J. How does binocular delay give information about depth? Vision Res 19: 523-532, 1979.
6. Carney T, Paradiso MA, and Freeman RD. A physiological correlate of the Pulfrich effect in cortical neurons of the cat. Vision Res 29: 155-165, 1989.
7. Casanova C, Nordmann JP, Ohzawa I, and Freeman RD. Direction selectivity of cells in the cat's striate cortex: differences between bar and grating stimuli. Vis Neurosci 9: 505-513, 1992.
8. Chen Y, Wang Y, and Qian N. Modeling V1 disparity tuning to time-varying stimuli. J Neurophysiol 86: 143-155, 2001.
9. Dean AF. The variability of discharge of simple cells in the cat striate cortex. Exp Brain Res 44: 437-440, 1981.
10. Dean AF, Tolhurst DJ, and Walker NS. Non-linear temporal summation by simple cells in cat striate cortex demonstrated by failure of superposition. Exp Brain Res 45: 456-458, 1982.
11. DeAngelis GC, Ohzawa I, and Freeman RD. Spatiotemporal organization of simple-cell receptive fields in the cat's striate cortex. II. Linearity of temporal and spatial summation. J Neurophysiol 69: 1118-1135, 1993.
12. DeAngelis GC, Ohzawa I, and Freeman RD. Receptive-field dynamics in the central visual pathways. Trends Neurosci 18: 451-458, 1995.
13. DeValois R, Yund EW, and Hepler N. The orientation and direction selectivity of cells in macaque visual cortex. Vision Res 22: 531-544, 1982.
14. Efron B. Bootstrap methods: another look at the jackknife. Ann Stat 7: 1-26, 1979.
15. Gardner JC, Douglas RM, and Cynader MS. A time-based stereoscopic depth mechanism in the visual cortex. Brain Res 328: 154-157, 1985.
16. Gizzi MS, Katz E, Schumer RA, and Movshon JA. Selectivity for orientation and direction of motion of single neurons in cat striate and extrastriate visual cortex. J Neurophysiol 63: 1529-1543, 1990.
17. Hamilton DB, Albrecht DG, and Geisler WS. Visual cortical receptive fields in monkey and cat: spatial and temporal phase transfer function. Vision Res 29: 1285-1308, 1989.
18. Harker GS and O'Neal OL. Some observations and measurements of the Pulfrich phenomenon. Percept Psychophys 2: 423-426, 1967.
19. Hawken MJ, Parker AJ, and Lund JS. Laminar organization and contrast sensitivity of direction-selective cells in the striate cortex of the Old World monkey. J Neurosci 8: 3541-3548, 1988.
20. Hawken MJ, Shapley RM, and Grosof DH. Temporal-frequency selectivity in monkey visual cortex. Vis Neurosci 13: 477-492, 1996.
21. Hayashi R, Maeda T, Shimojo S, and Tachi S. An integrative model of binocular vision: a stereo model utilizing interocularly unpaired points produces both depth and binocular rivalry. Vision Res 44: 2367-2380, 2004.
22. Hood DC, Zhang X, Greenstein VC, Kangovi S, Odel JG, Liebmann JM, and Ritch R. An interocular comparison of the multifocal VEP: a possible technique for detecting local damage to the optic nerve. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 41: 1580-1587, 2000.
23. Julesz B and White B. Short term visual memory and the Pulfrich phenomenon. Nature 222: 639-641, 1969.
24. Lee DN. Spatio-temporal integration in binocular-kinetic space perception. Vision Res 10: 65-78, 1970.
25. Marr D and Poggio T. A computational theory of human stereo vision. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 204: 301-328, 1979.
26. Morgan MJ. Perception of continuity in stroboscopic motion: a temporal frequency analysis. Vision Res 19: 491-500, 1979.
27. Morgan MJ and Castet E. Stereoscopic depth perception at high velocities. Nature 378: 380-383, 1995.
28. Morgan MJ and Fahle M. Motion-stereo mechanisms sensitive to interocular phase. Vision Res 40: 1667-1675, 2000.
29. Morgan MJ and Tyler CW. Mechanisms for dynamic stereomotion respond selectively to horizontal velocity components. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 262: 371-376, 1995.
30. Morgan MJ and Ward R. Interocular delay produces depth in subjectively moving noise patterns. Q J Exp Psychol 32: 387-395, 1980.
31. Movshon J, Thompson I, and Tolhurst DJ. Spatial summation in the receptive fields of simple cells in the cat's striate cortex. J Physiol 283: 53-77, 1978a.
32. Movshon JA and Newsome W. Visual response properties of striate cortical neurons projecting to area MT in macaque monkeys. J Neurosci 16: 7733-7741, 1996.
33. Movshon JA, Thompson ID, and Tolhurst DJ. Spatial and temporal contrast sensitivity of neurones in areas 17 and 18 of the cat's visual cortex. J Physiol 283: 101-120, 1978b.
34. Ohzawa I, DeAngelis GC, and Freeman RD. Stereoscopic depth discrimination in the visual cortex: neurons ideally suited as disparity detectors. Science 249: 1037-1041, 1990.
35. Orban GA, Kennedy H, and Bullier J. Velocity sensitivity and direction selectivity of neurons in areas V1 and V2 of the monkey: influence of eccentricity. J Neurophysiol 56: 462-480, 1986.
36. Pack CC, Born RT, and Livingstone MS. Two-dimensional substructure of stereo and motion interactions in macaque visual cortex. Neuron 37: 525-535, 2003.
37. Perez R, Gonzalez F, Justo MS, and Ulibarrena C. Interocular temporal delay sensitivity in the visual cortex of the awake monkey. Eur J Neurosci 11: 2593-2595, 1999.
38. Pettigrew JD, Nikara T, and Bishop PO. Binocular interaction on single units in cat striate cortex: simultaneous stimulation by single moving slit with receptive fields in correspondence. Exp Brain Res 6: 391-410, 1968.
39. Pollard SB, Mayhew JE, and Frisby JP. PMF: a stereo correspondence algorithm using a disparity gradient limit. Perception 14: 449-470, 1985.
40. Prince SJ, Pointon AD, Cumming BG, and Parker AJ. The precision of single neuron responses in cortical area V1 during stereoscopic depth judgments. J Neurosci 20: 3387-3400, 2000.
41. Prince SJ, Pointon AD, Cumming BG, and Parker AJ. Quantitative analysis of the responses of V1 neurons to horizontal disparity in dynamic random-dot stereograms. J Neurophysiol 87: 191-208, 2002.
42. Pulfrich C. Die Stereoscopie im Dienste der isochromen und heterochromen Photometrie. Naturwissenschaft 10: 553-564, 1922.
43. Qian N. Computing stereo disparity and motion with known binocular cell properties. Neural Comput 6: 390-404, 1994.
44. Qian N. Binocular disparity and the perception of depth. Neuron 18: 359-368, 1997.
45. Qian N and Andersen RA. A physiological model for motion-stereo integration and a unified explanation of Pulfrich-like phenomena. Vision Res 37: 1683-1698, 1997.
46. Read JCA. A Bayesian approach to the stereo correspondence problem. Neural Comput 14: 1371-1392, 2002.
47. Read JCA and Cumming BG. Testing quantitative models of binocular disparity selectivity in primary visual cortex. J Neurophysiol 90: 2795-2817, 2003.
48. Reid RC, Soodak RE, and Shapley RM. Directional selectivity and spatio-temporal structure of receptive fields of simple cells in cat striate cortex. J Neurophysiol 66: 505-529, 1991.
49. Reid RC, Victor JD, and Shapley RM. Broadband temporal stimuli decrease the integration time of neurons in cat striate cortex. Vis Neurosd 9: 39-45, 1992.
50. Ross J. Stereopsis by binocular delay. Nature 248: 363-364, 1974.
51. Ross J. The resources of binocular perception. Sci Am 234: 80-86, 1976.
52. Ross J and Hogben JH. Short-term memory in stereopsis. Vision Res 14: 1195-1201, 1974.
53. Ross J and Hogben JH. Letter: the Pulfrich effect and short-term memory in stereopsis. Vision Res 15: 1289-1290, 1975.
54. Schiller PH, Finlay BL, and Volman SF. Quantitative studies of single-cell properties in monkey striate cortex. I. Spatiotemporal organization of receptive fields. J Neurophysiol 39: 1288-1319, 1976.
55. Sutter EE and Bearse MA Jr. The optic nerve head component of the human ERG. Vision Res 39: 419-436, 1999.
56. Tolhurst DJ, Walker NS, Thompson ID, and Dean AF. Non-linearities of temporal summation in neurones in area 17 of the cat. Exp Brain Res 38: 431-435, 1980.
57. Tsai JJ and Victor JD. Reading a population code: a multi-scale neural model for representing binocular disparity. Vision Res 43: 445-466, 2003.
58. Tyler CW. Stereopsis in dynamic visual noise. Nature 250: 781-782, 1974.
59. Tyler CW. Stereomovement from interocular delay in dynamic visual noise: a random spatial disparity hypothesis. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 54: 374-386, 1977.