Preparation of de novo globular proteins based on proline dendrimers

Journal of Organic Chemistry

Volumn 70, Issue 16, 2005, Pages 6274-6281

  Sanclimens, Glòria ^a   Crespo, Laia ^a   Giralt, Ernest ^a   Albericio, Fernando ^a   Royo, Miriam ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BARCELONA   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AMINO ACIDS; CONFORMATIONS; DENDRIMERS; PLASTICITY; SYNTHESIS (CHEMICAL);

CONFORMATIONAL PLASTICITY; GLOBULAR PROTEINS; IMIDAZOLIDIN; PROLINE DENDRIMERS;

PROTEINS;

DENDRIMER; GLOBULAR PROTEIN; GLYCINE; IMIDAZOLIDINE DERIVATIVE; PROLINE;

ARTICLE; CIRCULAR DICHROISM; METHODOLOGY; PEPTIDE SYNTHESIS; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN SECONDARY STRUCTURE; PROTEIN STABILITY; PROTEIN SYNTHESIS; SOLID STATE;

CHROMATOGRAPHY, HIGH PRESSURE LIQUID; CIRCULAR DICHROISM; MOLECULAR STRUCTURE; PROLINE; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, SECONDARY; PROTEINS;

EID: 23044440151     PISSN: 00223263     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/jo050720u     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. 1Abbreviations: AB, 3-(4-hydroxymethylphenoxy)propionic acid; AM, p{(R,S)-amino-2,4-dimethoxybenzyl}-phenoxyacetic acid; Boc, t-butoxycarbonyl; CD, circular dichroism; DBU, 1,8-diazabicyclo[5.4.0]-undec-7- ene; DCM, dichloromethane; DIEA, N,N′-diisopropylethylamine; DIPCDI, N,N′-diisopropylcarbodiimide; DMAP, 4-dimethylaminopiridine; DMF, N,N-dimethylformamide; EtOH, ethanol; ESI-MS, electrospray ionization mass spectrometry; Fmoc, 9-fluorenylmethoxycarbonyl; G2-4, second, third and fourth generation; AcOH, acetic acid; HOBt, 1-hydroxybenzotriazole; Imd, imidazolidine-2-carboxylic acid; MBHA resin, 4-methylbenzhydrylamine resin; MALDI-TOF, matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization-time-of-flight mass spectrometry; MeOH, methanol; NMP, 1-methyl-2-pyrrolidone; PyAOP, 7-aza-benzotriazol-1-yl-N-oxy-tris(pyrrolidino)-phosphonium hexafluorophosphate; RP-HPLC, reverse-phase high performance liquid chromatography; SEC, size exclusion chromatography; SPPS, solid-phase peptide synthesis; TFA, trifluoroacetic acid.
2. Newkome, G. R.; Moorefield, C. N.; Vögtle, F. Dendrimers and Dendrons. Concepts, Synthesis, Applications; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, Germany, 2001.
3. Newkome, G. R. Advances in Dendritic Macromolecules; JAI Press Inc.: Stamford, CT, 1999.
4. Creighton, T. E. Proteins. Structure and Molecular Principles; W. H. Freeman and Company: New York, 1993.
5. Creighton, T. E. Protein Folding, W. H. Freeman, New York, 1992.
6. Levitt, M.; Gerstein, M.; Huang, E.; Subbiah, S.; Tsai, J. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 1997, 66, 549-579.
7. (a) Baltzer, L.; Nilsson, H.; Nilsson, J. Chem. Rev. 2001, 101, 3153-3163.
8. (b) Moffet, D. A.; Hecht, M. H. Chem. Rev. 2001, 101, 3191-3203.
9. (a) Parquette, J. R. Chimie 2003, 6, 779-789.
10. (b) Huang, B.; Prantil, M. A.; Gustafson, T. L.; Parquette J. R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 14518-14530.
11. Berger, A.; Kurtz, J.; Katchalsky, E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1954, 76, 5552-5553.
12. Rabanal, F.; Ludevid, M. D.; Pons, M.; Giralt, E. Biopolymers 1993, 33, 1019-1028.
13. Okabayashi, H.; Isemura, T.; Sakakibara, S. Biopolymers 1968, 6, 323-330.
14. Helbecque, N.; Loucheux-Lefebvre, M. H. Int. J. Pept. Protein Res. 1982, 19, 94-101.
15. Traub, W.; Shmueli, U. Nature 1963, 198, 1165-1166.
16. Cowan, P. M.; McGavin, S. Nature 1955, 176, 501-503.
17. Reiersen, H.; Rees, A. R. TRENDS Biochem. Sci. 2001, 26, 11, 679-684.
18. Crespo, L.; Sanclimens, G.; Montaner, B.; Pérez-Tomás, R.; Royo, M.; Pons, M.; Albericio, F.; Giralt, E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 8876-8883.
19. Sadler, K.; Eom, K. D.; Yang, J.-L.; Dimitrova, Y.; Tam, J. P. Biochemistry 2002, 41, 14150-14157.
20. Fernández-Carneado, J.; Kogan, M. J.; Castel, S.; Pujals, S.; Giralt, E. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2004, 43, 1811-1814.
21. Kinberger, G. A.; Cai, W.; Goodman, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 15162-15163.
22. Duncan, R. Nature Reviews Drug Discovery 2003, 2, 347-360.
23. Crespo, L.; Sanclimens, G.; Royo, M.; Giralt, E.; Albericio, F. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2002, 11, 1756-1762.
24. Sanclimens, G.; Crespo, L.; Giralt, E.; Royo, M.; Albericio, F. Biopolymers (Peptide Sci.) 2004, 76, 283-297.
25. Although MS is considered a qualitative analytical method, in this case it is useful to determine small amount of deletion peptides, which are formed from the same residue, and therefore should have a response very similar to MS. Other techniques such as HPLC are not useful due to structural similarity of impurities.
26. Sakakibara, S. Biopolymers (Peptide Sci.) 1999, 51, 279-296.
27. Albericio, F.; Cases, M.; Alsina, J.; Triolo, S. A.; Carpino, L. A.; Kates, S. A. Tetrahedron Lett. 1997, 38, 4853-4856.
28. For these kind couplings where excess of coupling reagent is present, phosphonium salts such as PyAOP are preferred to aminum/ uronium salts, because the latter can give guanidinium formation. Albericio, F.; Bofill, J. M.; El-Faham, A.; Kates, S. A. J. Org. Chem. 1998, 26, 9678-9683.
29. Madder, A.; Farcy, N.; Hosten, N. G. C.; De Muynck, H.; De Clercq, P. J.; Barry, J.; Davis, A. P. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 1999, 2787-2791.
30. Kaiser, E.; Colescott, R. L.; Bossinger, C. D.; Cook, P. I. Anal. Biochem. 1970, 34, 594-598.
31. These signals came from the low percentage of Pro deletion in building block 1, and its intensity was amplified due the dendritic architecture itself.
32. Several buffers were studied as mobile phases.
33. Attardi, M. E.; Porcu, G.; Taddei, M. Tetrahedron Lett. 2000, 41, 7391-7394.
34. Kakinoki, S.; Hirano, Y.; Oka, M. Polymer Bull. 2004, 53, 109-115.
35. This was taken as a reference to show that the presence of an additional residue of Gly does not disrupt the expected polyproline secondary structure.
36. Bochiccio, B.; Tamburro, A. M. Chirality 2002, 14, 782-784.
37. Hgashi, N.; Koga, T.; Niwa, M. Adv. Matter. 2000, 12, 1373-1375.
38. Zhou, M.; Bentley, D.; Ghosh, I. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 734-735.
39. Zhou, M.; Bentley, D.; Ghosh, I. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 734-735.
40. Kuisle, O.; Lolo, M.; Quiñoá, E.; Riguera, R. Tetrahedron 1999, 55, 14807-14812.
41. Christensen, T. Acta Chem. Scan. 1979, 33, 760-766.