The factor structure of the Eysenck personality profiler in Russia

Personality and Individual Differences

Volumn 37, Issue 8, 2004, Pages 1681-1692

  Knyazev, Gennadij G ^a   Belopolsky, Victor I ^b   Bodunov, M V ^b   Wilson, Glenn D ^c  

^a SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH INSTITUTE OF PHYSIOLOGY AND BASIC MEDICINE   (Russian Federation)

^b INSTITUTE OF PSYCHOLOGY   (Russian Federation)

^c KING'S COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Confirmatory factor analysis; Eysenck Personality Profiler; Eysenck Personality Questionnaire; Item analysis

Indexed keywords

EID: 22944489849     PISSN: 01918869     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.paid.2004.03.003     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Arbuckle, J. L., & Wothke, W. (1999). AMOS 4.0 user's guide. SmallWaters Corporation, US.
2. Aziz, S., & Jackson, C. J. (2001). A comparison between three and five factor models of Pakistani personality data. Personality and Individual Differences, 31, 1311-1319.
3. Byrne, B. M. (1998). Structural equation modeling with LISREL, PRELIS, and SIMPLIS: basic concepts, applications, and programming. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
4. Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Revised NEO personality inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO five-factor inventory (NEO-FFI) professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
5. Eysenck, H. J., Barrett, P. T., Wilson, G. D., & Jackson, C. J. (1992). Primary trait measurement of the 21 components of the PEN system. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 8, 109-117.
6. Eysenck, H. J., & Eysenck, S. B. G. (1975). Manual of the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire. London: Hodder & Stoughton.
7. Eysenck, H. J., & Wilson, G. D. (2000). The Eysenck Personality Profiler (version 6). Worthing, UK. Available: www.Psi-Press.co.uk.
8. Eysenck, H. J., Wilson, G. D., & Jackson, C. J. (2000). Eysenck Personality Profiler (short V6). Worthing, UK. Available: www.Psi-Press.co.uk.
9. Floyd, F. J., & Widaman, K. F. (1995). Factor analysis in the development and refinement of clinical assessment instruments. Psychological Assessment, 7, 286-299.
10. Hanin, Y., Eysenck, S. B. G., Eysenck, H. J., & Barrett, P. T. (1991). A cross-cultural study of personality: Russia and England. Personality and Individual Differences, 12, 265-271.
11. Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modelling, 6(1), 1-55.
12. Jackson, C. J., Furnham, A., Forde, L., & Cotter, T. (2000). The dimensional structure of the Eysenck Personality Profiler. British Journal of Psychology, 91, 223-240.
13. Jackson, C. J., Furnham, A., & Lawty-Jones, M. (1999). Relationship between indecisiveness and neuroticism: the moderating effect of a tough-minded culture. Personality and Individual Differences, 27, 789-800.
14. Joreskog, K. G., & Sorbom, D. (1993). Structural equation modeling with the SIMPLIS command language. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
15. Moosbrugger, H., & Fischbach, A. (2002). Evaluating the dimensionality of the Eysenck Personality Profiler-German version (EPP-D): a contribution to the Super Three vs. Big Five Discussion. Personality and Individual Differences, 33, 191-211.
16. Muris, P., Schmidt, H., Merckelbach, H., & Rassin, E. (2000). Reliability, factor structure and validity of the Dutch Eysenck Personality Profiler. Personality and Individual Differences, 29, 857-868.
17. Neale, M. C., Boker, S. M., Xie, G., & Maes, H. H. (2002). Mx: statistical modeling (6th ed.). VCU Box 900126, Richmond, VA 23298: Department of Psychiatry.
18. Petrides, K. V., Jackson, C. J., Furnham, A., & Levine, S. Z. (2003). Exploring issues of personality measurement and structure through the development of a revised short form of the Eysenck Personality Profiler. Journal of Personality Assessment, 81, 271-280.