A mathematical model of the groundwood process: Part I: general

Pulp and Paper Canada

Volumn 106, Issue 6, 2005, Pages 36-39

  Brewster, D B ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

Grinding; Ground wood; Mathematical models; Optimization; Process control

Indexed keywords

DRAINAGE; FRICTION; HYDRAULICS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; MOTORS; OPTIMIZATION; PARAMETER ESTIMATION; PROCESS CONTROL;

GROUNDWOOD; GROUNDWOOD PROCESSES; QUALITY PREDICTION; SLUDGE REDUCTION;

WOOD PRODUCTS;

DRAINAGE; FRICTION; HYDRAULICS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; MOTORS; OPTIMIZATION; WOOD;

EID: 22944464447     PISSN: 03164004     EISSN: None     Source Type: Trade Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. BREWSTER, D.B. Mill-Wide Process Control and Information Systems. Pulp and Paper Manufacture. Vol. 10. Montreal: TAPPI/CPPA Joint Textbook Committee (1993).
2. BREWSTER, D.B. SGW Process Control and Optimization: Leveraging Process Knowledge for Results. Pulp Paper Can. 103(9): T 248-T251 (September 2002).
3. CAMPBELL, W.B. Groundwood Studies: Theoretical Efficiency. Pulp & Paper Can. 35(4): 218 (1934).
4. ATACK, D. The Grinding Process: A Fundamental Approach. Pulp Paper Can. 56 (11): 120 (November 1955).
5. SCHAFER, E.R., PEW, J.C. Tech Assoc Papers 23: 579-82 (1940).
6. BERGSTROM, J., et al. Analysis of Grinding Process Variables. Svensk Papperstidning 60 (11): 409 (1957).
7. ALEXANDER, D.K. Automated Process Control for Pulpstone Grinders (The CAMEL Process). Pulp & Paper Mag of Canada 74(2): 77 (1973).
8. PAULAPURO, H. Operating Model of a Grinder, Part I. Paperi ja Puu 58(1): 5 (1976);
9. Part II, Paperi ja Puu 58(10): 569 (1976);
10. Part III, Paperi ja Puu 59 (4a): 193 (1977).
11. JENSEN, A.C., MANNER H., PAULAPURO, H. Grinding Model for Different Species. Proc., International Mechanical Pulping Conference, Oslo, 67 (June 1983).
12. GIBSON, L.J. Modeling of Wood as a Cellular Material. Proc., 3rd Joint ASCE/ASME Mechanics Conference, La Jolla (1989).
13. DeMONTMORENCY, W.H. The Relationship of Wood Characteristics to Mechanical Pulping. Pulp & Paper Mag. of Canada 66(6): T325 (June 1965).
14. LONNBERG, B., GROS, G. Modeling of the Wood Grinding Process. Proc., International Mechanical Pulping Conference, Oslo, 257, (1993).
15. LONNBERG, B., GROS, G. Friction between Wood and Pulpstone - A Clue to Grinding? Proc., TAPPI Pulping Conference, San Francisco (1997).
16. HAKA-RISKU, J. Batch Control of Pressure Grinding (in Finnish). Master of Science Thesis. Tampere University of Technology Automation and Control Institute (1998).
17. LEHTO, J.H.J. TUOVINEN, O., BJORKQVIST, T. New Thinking in Groundwood Process Control. Proc., International Mechanical Pulping Conference, Houston (May 1999).
18. LUUKKO, K, PAULAPURO, H. Development of Fines Quality in the TMP Process. JPPS 25(8): 273 (August 1999).
19. FORGACS, O.L. The Characterization of Mechanical Pulps. Pulp Paper Can. 64 (Convention Issue): T89 (1963).
20. EL-HOSSEINY, F., YAN, J.F. Analysis of Canadian Standard Freeness, Part II. Practical Implications. Pulp Paper Can. 81(6): T116 (June 1980).
21. BREWSTER, D.B. ROGERS, J.H. Analysis of on-line Drainage Testers. Pulp Paper Can. 86(7): T186 (July1985).
22. KANO, K., IWAMIDA, T., SUMI, Y. Energy Consumption in Mechanical Pulping. Pulp Paper Can. 83(6): T157 (June1982).
23. STRAND, B.C., MOKVIST, A. The Application of Comminution Theory to Describe Refiner Performance. JPPS 15(3): J105 (1989).
24. SENGER, J.J., OUELLET, D. Factors Affecting the Shear Forces in High-Consistency Refining. JPPS 28(11): 364 (November 2002).
25. GENDRON, S., et al. Advanced Control of the Stone Groundwood Process. Pulp Paper Can. 91 (2): T71 (February 1990).