Invented predicates to reduce knowledge acquisition

Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence (Subseries of Lecture Notes in Computer Science)

Volumn 3257, Issue , 2004, Pages 293-306

  Suryanto, Hendra ^a   Compton, Paul ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMS; BOOLEAN ALGEBRA; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DATA PROCESSING; DECISION MAKING; ERRORS; HEURISTIC METHODS; KNOWLEDGE BASED SYSTEMS; LEARNING SYSTEMS; MATHEMATICAL OPERATORS; RESOURCE ALLOCATION; ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; LEARNING ALGORITHMS; MERGERS AND ACQUISITIONS; SEMANTIC WEB;

BOOLEAN OPERATORS; KNOWLEDGE BASES (KB); LEARNING TECHNIQUES; RIPPLE-DOWN RULE (RDR); INCREMENTAL KNOWLEDGE ACQUISITION; MACHINE LEARNING TECHNIQUES; RIPPLE DOWN RULES; SPEED UP;

KNOWLEDGE ACQUISITION;

EID: 22944461754     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-30202-5_20     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (33)

1. Muggleton, S. Duce, An oracle-based approach to constructive induction. Proceeding of the Tenth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence.(1987) 287 - 292
2. Compton, P. and R. Jansen. A philosophical basis for knowledge acquisition. Knowledge Acquisition 2(1990) 241-257
3. Edwards, G., et al. PEIRS: a pathologist maintained expert system for the interpretation of chemical pathology reports. Pathology 25(1993) 27-34
4. Kang, B., P. Compton, and P. Preston. Multiple classification ripple down rules: Evaluation and possibilities. 9th AAAI-sponsored Banff Knowledge Acquisition for Knowledge Based Systems Workshop.(1995) 17.1-17.20
5. Shiraz, G. and C. Sammut. Combining knowledge acquisition and machine learning to control dynamic systems. 15th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Nagoya Japan, Morgan Kaufmann. (1997) pp908-913
6. Beydoun, G. and A. Hoffmann. Acquisition of Search Knowledge, the 10th European Knowledge Acquisition Workshop.(1997) 1-16
7. Beydoun, G. and A. Hoffmann. Building Problem Solvers Based on Search Control Knowledge, 11th Banff Knowledge Acquisition for Knowledge Base System Workshop, Calgary, SRDG publications,.(1998) ppShare1-1-Share1-16.
8. Kang, B., et al. A help desk system with intelligent interface. Applied Artificial Intelligence 11((7-8)): 611-631.( 1997)
9. Compton, P., Ramadan, Z., Preston, P., Le-Gia, T., Chellen, V. and Mullholland, M. A trade-off between domain knowledge and problem solving method power, 11th Banff knowledge acquisition for knowledge-bases systems workshop, Banff, SRDG Publications, University of Calgary.(1998) SHARE 17, 1-19
10. Richards, D. and P. Compton. SISYPHUS I Revisited: An Incremental Approach to Resource Allocation using Ripple Down Rules. 12th Workshop on Knowledge Acquisition, Modeling and Management, SRDG Publications, Banff, Canada, 16th-21st October (1999)
11. Drake, B. and G. Beydoun. Predicate logic-based incremental knowledge acquisition. Proceedings of the sixth Pacific International Knowledge Acquisition Workshop, P. Compton, A. Hoffmann, H. Motoda and T. Yamaguchi Sydney(2000) 71-88
12. Compton, P., P. Preston, and T. Yip. Local patching produces compact knowledge bases. The European Knowledge Acquisition Workshop, Springer-Verlag.(1994) 104-117
13. Kang, B., P. Compton, and P. Preston. Simulated Expert Evaluation of Multiple Classification Ripple Down Rules, 11th Banff knowledge acqusition for knowledge-based systems workshop, Banff, SRDG Publications, University of Calgary.(1998) EVAL 4, 1-19
14. Suryanto, H., D. Richards, and P. Compton. The automatic compression of Multiple Classification Ripple Down Rule Knowledged Based Systems: Preliminary Experiments. Knowledge-based Intelligence Information Engineering Systems, Adelaide, South Australia, IEEE.(1999) 203-206
15. Catlett, J. Ripple Down Rules as a Mediating Representation in Interactive Induction. Proceedings of the Second Japanese Knowledge Acquisition for Knowledge Based Systems Workshop, Kobe, Japan.(1992) 155-170
16. Gaines, B.R. and P.J. Compton. Induction of Ripple Down Rules. Fifth Australian Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Hobart. (1992)
17. Kivinen, J., H. Mannila, and E. Ukkonen. Learning Rules with Local Exceptions. European Conference on Computational Theory, Clarendon Press, Oxford.(1993) 35-46
18. Scheffer, T. Learning Rules with Nested Exceptions. International Workshop on Artificial Intelligence.(1995)
19. Siromoney, A. and R. Siromoney, Variations and Local Exception in Inductive Logic Programming, in Machine Intelligence - Applied Machine Intelligence, K. Furukawa, D. Michie, and S. Muggleton, Editors. 1993. p. 213 - 234.
20. Wada, T., et al. Integrating Inductive Learning and Knowledge Acquisition in the Ripple Down Rules Method. Proceeding of the 6th Pacific Knowledge Acquisition Workshop, Sydney, Australia(2000) 325-341
21. Clancey, W.J. Heuristic classification. Artificial Intelligence 27:. (1985) 289-350
22. Compton, P., et al., Maintaining an expert system, in Applications of Expert Systems, J.R. Quinlan, Editor. 1989, Addison Wesley: London, p. 366-385.
23. Beydoun, G. and H. A. Incremental Acquisition of Search Knowledge. International Journal of Human Computer Studies 52(3):( 2000) 493-530
24. Compton, P. and D. Richards. Generalising Ripple-Down Rules. Knowledge Engineering and Knowledge Management: Methods, Models, Tools, Eds. R. Dieng; O. Corby, Juan-les-Pins France, 2-6 Oct. Springer, Berlin, (2000) 380-386
25. Matheus, C.J. and L.A. Rendell. Constructive induction on decision trees. Proceed-ings of the Eleventh International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence Detroit, MI: Morgan Kaufmann,(1989) 645-650
26. Bloedorn, E. and M. R.S. Data Driven Constructive Induction in AQ17-PRE: A Method and Experiments. Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Tools for Artificiall Intelligence, San Jose, CA, November 9-14(1991)
27. Zupan, B., et al. Machine Learning by Function Decompo-sition. Proceedings of the 14 th International Conference on Machine Learning.(1997) 421-429
28. Sutton, R.S. and C.J. Matheus. Learning polynomial functions by feature construction. Machine Learning: Proceedings of the Eighth Interna-tional Workshop, Evanston, IL: Morgan Kaufmann.(1991) 208-212
29. Srinivasan, A. and R.D. King. Feature construction with inductive logic program-ming: A study of quantitative predictions of biological activity aided by structural attributes. Inductive Logic Programming: Proceedings of the 6th International Workshop, Springer.(1996) 89-104
30. Flach, P.A. and N. Lavrac. The role of feature construction in inductive rule learning. Proceedings of the International Conference on Machine Learning 2000 workshop on Attribute-Value and Relational Learning: crossing the boundaries, Stan-ford, USA, Luc De Raedt and Stefan Kramer.(2000) 1-11.
31. Compton, P., P. Preston, and B. Kang. The Use of Simulated Experts in Evaluating Knowledge Acquisition. 9th AAAI-sponsored Banff Knowledge Acquisition for Knowledge Base System Workshop, Canada, Banff, Canada, University of Calgary.(1995) pp12.1-12.18
32. Kang, B. (1996). Validating Knowledge Acquisition: Multiple Classification Ripple Down Rules. School of Computer Science and Engineering. Sydney, New South Wales University.
33. Tecuci, G. and Y. Kodratoff, Machine Learning and Knowledge Acquisition: Integrated Approaches. 1995: Academic Press.