Chemisorption sites of CO on small gold clusters and transitions from chemisorption to physisorption

Journal of Chemical Physics

Volumn 122, Issue 5, 2005, Pages

  Zhai, Hua Jin ^a,b   Wang, Lai Sheng ^a,b  

^a WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b PACIFIC NORTHWEST NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CHEMISORBS; CHEMISORPTION SITES; GOLD CLUSTERS; PHYSISORPTION;

ADSORPTION; CARBON MONOXIDE; CHEMISORPTION; COMPLEXATION; PHASE TRANSITIONS; PHOTOELECTRON SPECTROSCOPY;

GOLD;

EID: 22944442603     PISSN: 00219606     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1063/1.1850091     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. M. Haruta, Catal. Today 36, 153 (1997) and references therein.
2. G. C. Bond and D. T. Thompson, Catal. Rev. - Sci. Eng. 41, 319 (1999).
3. M. Valden, X. Lai, and D. W. Goodman, Science 281, 1647 (1998).
4. D. C. Meier and D. W. Goodman, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 126, 1892 (2004).
5. T. S. Kim, J. D. Stiehl, C. T. Reeves, R. J. Meyer, and C. B. Mullins, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 125, 2018 (2003).
6. J. D. Stiehl, T. S. Kim, S. M. McClure, and C. B. Mullins, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 126, 1606 (2004).
7. J. Guzman and B. C. Gates, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 126, 2672 (2004).
8. C. Lemire, R. Meyer, S. Shaikhutdinov, and H. J. Freund, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 43, 118 (2004).
9. Z. P. Liu, P. Hu, and A. Alavi, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 124, 14770 (2002).
10. L. M. Molina and B. Hammer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 206102 (2003).
11. A. Sanchez, S. Abbet, U. Heiz, W. D. Schneider, H. Hakkinen, R. N. Barnett, and U. Landman, J. Phys. Chem. A 103, 9573 (1999).
12. S. Lee, C. Fan, T. Wu, and S. L. Anderson, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 126, 5682 (2004).
13. N. Lopez, T. V. W. Janssens, B. S. Clausen, Y. Xu, M. Mavrikakis, T. Bligaard, and J. K. Norskov, J. Catal. 223, 232 (2004).
14. D. Stolcic, M. Fischer, G. Gantefor, Y. D. Kim, Q. Sun, and P. Jena, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 125, 2848 (2003).
15. M. L. Kimble, A. W. Castleman, Jr., R. Mitric, C. Burgel, and V. Bonacic-Koutecky, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 126, 2526 (2004).
16. J. Hagen, L. D. Socaciu, U. Heiz, T. M. Bernhardt, and L. Woste, Eur. Phys. J. D 24, 327 (2003).
17. L. D. Socaciu, J. Hagen, T. M. Bernhardt, L. Woste, U. Heiz, H. Hakkinen, and U. Landman, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 125, 10437 (2003).
18. W. T. Wallace and R. L. Whetten, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 124, 7499 (2002).
19. M. A. Nygren, P. E. M. Siegbahn, C. Jin, T. Guo, and R. E. Smalley, J. Chem. Phys. 95, 6181 (1991).
20. T. H. Lee and K. M. Ervin, J. Phys. Chem. 98, 10023 (1994).
21. W. T. Wallace and R. L. Whetten, J. Phys. Chem. B 104, 10964 (2000).
22. I. Balteanu, O. P. Balaj, B. S. Fox, M. K. Beyer, Z. Bastl, and V. E. Bondybey, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 5, 1213 (2003).
23. G. Luttgens, N. Pontius, P. S. Bechthold, M. Neeb, and W. Eberhardt, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 076102 (2002).
24. B. Yoon, H. Hakkinen, and U. Landman, J. Phys. Chem. A 107, 4066 (2003).
25. S. A. Varganov, R. M. Olson, M. S. Gordon, and H. Meitu, J. Chem. Phys. 119, 2531 (2003).
26. X. Ding, Z. Li, J. Yang, J. G. Hou, and Q. Zhu, J. Chem. Phys. 120, 9594 (2004).
27. X. Wu, L. Senapati, S. K. Nayak, A. Selloni, and M. Hajaligol, J. Chem. Phys. 117, 4010 (2002).
28. D. W. Yuan and Z. Zeng, J. Chem. Phys. 120, 6574 (2004).
29. H. Hakkinen and U. Landman, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 123, 9704 (2001).
30. H. Hakkinen and U. Landman, Phys. Rev. B 62, R2287 (2000).
31. F. Furche, R. Ahlrichs, P. Weis, C. Jacob, S. Gilb, T. Bierweiler, and M. M. Kappes, J. Chem. Phys. 117, 6982 (2002).
32. H. Hakkinen, B. Yoon, U. Landman, X. Li, H. J. Zhai, and L. S. Wang, J. Phys. Chem. A 107, 6168 (2003).
33. J. Li, X. Li, H. J. Zhai, and L. S. Wang, Science 299, 864 (2003).
34. A. Cho, Science 299, 1684 (2003).
35. L. S. Wang, H. S. Cheng, and J. Fan, J. Phys. Chem. 102, 9480 (1995).
36. -, although experimental conditions can be tuned to minimize the interference.
37. - is particularly stable.
38. This splitting could be due to either structural isomers or new electronic features induced by CO chemisorption. A firm interpretation would require detailed theoretical calculations.
39. - with m=6-8 and n=4-6. Although saturation was not observed, the redshift of the electron binding energy upon CO chemisorption was observed in each case.