Excluding particular information from consent forms

Accountability in Research

Volumn 12, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 33-45

  Dickert, Neal ^a   Kass, Nancy ^a   Paasche Orlow, Michael ^b   Taylor, Holly ^a  

^a JOHNS HOPKINS BLOOMBERG SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

^b BOSTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Confidentiality; Consent form; Ethics; Human subjects research; Informed consent; International research

Indexed keywords

ANALYTICAL APPROACH; ARTICLE; BIOMEDICAL AND BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; CONFIDENTIALITY; CULTURAL ANTHROPOLOGY; DEVELOPING COUNTRY; DOCUMENTATION; ETHICS; FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT; GOVERNMENT REGULATION; HEALTH STATUS; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; HUMAN IMMUNODEFICIENCY VIRUS INFECTION; INFORMED CONSENT; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; LEGAL ASPECT; METHODOLOGY; PERSONNEL; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIVACY; PROFESSIONAL STANDARD; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; RESEARCH SUBJECT; RISK; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR; SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY; STANDARD; UNITED STATES;

ANALYTICAL APPROACH; BIOMEDICAL AND BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH;

COMMUNICATION; CONFIDENTIALITY; CONSENT FORMS; CULTURE; DEVELOPING COUNTRIES; DISCLOSURE; DOCUMENTATION; ETHICS COMMITTEES, RESEARCH; GOVERNMENT REGULATION; GUIDELINES; HEALTH STATUS; HIV SEROPOSITIVITY; HUMAN EXPERIMENTATION; HUMANS; INFORMED CONSENT; PRIVACY; RESEARCH PERSONNEL; RESEARCH SUBJECTS; RESEARCH SUPPORT; RISK; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR; STEREOTYPING; UNITED STATES;

EID: 22844449352     PISSN: 08989621     EISSN: 15455815     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/08989620590918916     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Advisory Committee on Human Radiation Experiments, (ACHRE) (1996). Research Proposal Review Project. In Final Report of the Advisory Committee on Human Radiation Experiments (New York: Oxford University Press).
2. Advisory Committee on Human Radiation Experiments (ACHRE). (1996). Subject Interview Study. In Final Report of the Advisory Committee on Human Radiation Experiments (New York: Oxford University Press).
3. Appelbaum, P. S., Lidz, C. W., and Meisel, A. (1987). Informed Consent: Legal Theory and Clinical Practice (New York: Oxford University Press).
4. Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences (CIOMS). (2002). International Ethical Guidelines for Biomedical Research Involving Human Subjects (Geneva: Author).
5. Daugherty, C. K., Banik, D. M., Janish, L., and Ratain, M. J. (2000). Quantitative Analysis of Ethical Issues in Phase I Trials: A Survey Interview Study of 144 Advanced Cancer Patients. IRB, 22(3): 6-14.
6. Flory, J. S., and Emanuel, E. J. (2004).Interventions to Improve Research Participants' Understanding in Informed Consent for Research. Journal of the American Medical Association, 292: 1593-1601.
7. Horng, S. et al. (2002). Descriptions of Benefits and Risks in Consent Forms for Phase 1 Oncology Trials. New England Journal of Medicine, 347(26): 2134-2140.
8. Joffe, S. et al. (2001) Quality of Informed Consent in Cancer Clinical Trials: A Cross-Sectional Survey. Lancet, 358(9295): 1772-1777.
9. Kass, N. E, Maman, S., and Atkinson, J. (in review) Is "Informed Choice" a Reality for Research Participation in Developing Countries? The Experience in Three International Research Studies.
10. Layton, S., and Korsen, J. (1994). Informed Consent in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery: A Study of the Value of Written Warnings. British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 32: 34-46.
11. Levine, R. J. (1986). Ethics and Regulation of Clinical Research (2nd ed.) (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press).
12. Macklin, R. (1999). Understanding Informed Consent. Acta Oncologica, 38: 83-87.
13. Meisel, A., and Kuczewski, M. (1996). Legal Myths About Informed Consent. Archives of Internal Medicine, 156: 2521-2526.
14. Morrow, G., Gootnick, J., and Scmale, A. (1978). A Simple Technique for Increasing Cancer Patients Knowledge of Informed Consent to Treatment. Cancer, 42: 793-799.
15. Murray, T. H. (1980). Commentary: Was This Deception Really Necessary? IRB, 2(10): 7-8.
16. National Bioethics Advisory Commission (NBAC). (2001). Ethical and Policy Issues in Research Involving Human Participants: Report and Recommendations of the National Bioethics Advisory Commision (Bethesda: U.S. Government).
17. Neptune, S. M. (1996). Take-Home Informed Consent for Intravenous Contrast Media. Investigative Radiology, 31(2): 109-113.
18. Paasche-Orlow, M. K., Taylor, H. A., and Brancati, F. L. (2003). Readability Standards for Informed-Consent Forms as Compared with Actual Readability. New England Journal of Medicine, 348(8): 721-726.
19. Puglisi, T. (2000). IRB Knowledge of Local Research Context. Available at . Accessed on 8/10/04.
20. Rodenhuis, S. et al. (1984). Patient Motivation and Informed Consent in a Phase I Study of an Anticancer Agent. European Journal of Cancer Clinical Oncology, 20: 457-462.
21. Silva, M. C., and Sorrell, J.M. (1988). Enhancing Comprehension of Information for Informed Consent. IRB, 10(1): 1-5.
22. Sugarman, J. et al. (1999). Empirical Research on Informed Consent: An Annotated Bibliography. Hastings Center Report, 29(1): S1-42.
23. Titus, S. L., and Keane, M. A. (1996). Do You Understand? An Ethical Assessment of Researchers' Description of the Consenting Process. Journal of Clinical Ethics, 7(1): 60-68.
24. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. (1998). Information Sheets: A Guide to Informed Consent. Available at . Accessed on 8/23/04.
25. Wendler, D. (1996). Deception in Medical and Behavioral Research: Is It Ever Acceptable? The Milbank Quarterly, 74(1): 87-114.
26. Wendler, D., and Rackoff, J. E. (2001). Informed Consent and Respecting Autonomy: What's a Signature Got to Do With It? IRB, 23(3): 1-4.