The influence of functional limitations and various demographic factors on self-reported activity restriction at older ages

Disability and Rehabilitation

Volumn 27, Issue 15, 2005, Pages 871-883

  Cambois, Emmanuelle ^a   Robine, Jean Marie ^b   Romieu, Isabelle ^b  

^a INSTITUT NATIONAL D'ÉTUDES DÉMOGRAPHIQUES   (France)

^b UNIV MONTPELLIER   (France)

Author keywords

Activity; Differentials; Disability; Functional limitations; Gender; Older ages; Restrictions

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGE; AGED; ARTICLE; BODY MOVEMENT; DATA ANALYSIS; DEMOGRAPHY; FEMALE; FRANCE; FUNCTIONAL DISEASE; GENDER; HEALTH SURVEY; HOUSEHOLD; HUMAN; LOGISTIC REGRESSION ANALYSIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PHYSICAL ACTIVITY; PHYSICAL DISABILITY; PHYSICAL PERFORMANCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROBABILITY; RESIDENTIAL HOME; RISK ASSESSMENT; SELF CARE; SELF REPORT; SEX DIFFERENCE; STATISTICAL MODEL; TIME PERCEPTION; VISION;

ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING; AGE FACTORS; AGED; AGING; DEMOGRAPHY; DISABILITY EVALUATION; FEMALE; FRANCE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MOBILITY LIMITATION; MOTOR ACTIVITY; SELF ASSESSMENT (PSYCHOLOGY); SEX FACTORS;

EID: 22744441390     PISSN: 09638288     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09638280500030860     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Cambois E, Desesquelles A, Ravaud IF. Femmes et hommes ne sont pas égaux face au handicap. Population et Sociétés 203;386:1-4 (in English on line: http://www.ined.fr/english-version/publications/pop_et_soc/index.html).
2. Mormiche P et le groupe de projet HID. Le handicap se conjugue au pluriel. INSEE première 2000;742:1-4.
3. Nagi SZ. Some conceptual issues in disability and rehabilitation. In: Sussman MB, editor. Sociology and rehabilitation. Washington, DC: American Sociological Association, 1965. pp 100-113.
4. Nagi SZ. An epidemiology of disability among adults in the United States. Milbank Memorial Fund Quarterly/Health and Society 1976;54:439-467.
5. Wood PHN, Badley EM. An epidemiological appraisal of disablement. In: Bennett AE, editor. Recent advances in community medicine. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone, 1978. pp 149-173.
6. World Health Organization. International classification of impairments, disabilities, and handicaps. Geneva: WHO, 1980. (Reprint 1993).
7. Dunlop DD, Hughes SL, Manheim LM. Disability in activities of daily living: Patterns of change and a hierarchy of disability. Am J Public Health 1997;87(3):378-383.
8. Jagger C, Arthur AJ, Spiers NA, Clarke M. Patterns of onset of disability in activities of daily living with age. J Am Geriatr Soc 2001;49(4):404-409.
9. Barberger-Gateau P., Rainville C., Letenneur L., Dartigues J.-F. A hierarchical model of domains of disablement in the elderly: A longitudinal approach. Dis Rehab 2000;22(7):308-317.
10. Colvez A, Castex A, Carrière I. Réversibilité de l'incapacité chez les personnes âgées: Une étude du devenir à long terme en Haute-Normandie. Revue d'Epidémiologie et de Santé Publique 2003;51:565-573.
11. Barberger-Gateau P, Alioum A, Peres K, Regnault A, Fabrigoule C, Nikulin M, Dartigues JF. The contribution of dementia to the disablement process and modifying factors. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord 2004;18(3-4):330-337.
12. Verbrugge LM, Jette AM. The disablement process. Soc Sci Medicine 1994;38:1-14.
13. Verbrugge LM. New thinking and science on disability in mid-and late life. Eur J Public Health 1995;5:20-28.
14. Robine JM, Ravaud JF, Cambois E. General concepts of disablement. In: Hamerman D, editor. Osteoarthritis: Public health implication for an aging population. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press, 1997. pp 63-83.
15. Cambois E, Robine JM. Concepts et mesure de l'incapacité: Définitions et application d'un modèle à la population française. Retraite et Société 2003; 39:62-91.
16. Avlund K. Methodological challenges in measurements of functional ability in gerontological research: A review. Aging Clin Exp Res 1997;9:164-174.
17. Rubenstein LZ, Schairer C, Wieland GD, Kane R. Systematic biases in functional status assessment of elderly adults: Effects of different data sources. J Gerontol 1984;39:686-691.
18. Fried LP, Bandeen-Roche K, Williamson ID, Prasada-Rao P, Chee E, Tepper S, Rubin GS. Functional decline in older adults: Expanding methods of ascertainment. J Gerontol: Med Sci 1996;51A:M206-M214.
19. Harwood RH, Prince M, Mann A, Ebrahim S. Association between diagnoses, impairments, disability and handicap in a population of elderly people. Int J Epidemiol 1998;27:261-268.
20. Tager IB, Swanson A, Satariano WA. Reliability of physical performance and self-reported functional measures in an older population. J Gerontol: Med Sci 1998;53A:M295-M300.
21. Wolinsky FD, Johnson RJ. The use of health services by older adults. J Gerontol: Soc Sci 1991;46:S345-S357.
22. Lawrence RH, Jette AM. Disentangling the disablement process. J Gerontol: Soc Sci 1998;51B:S173-S182.
23. Manton KG, Stallard E, Corder LS. The dynamics of dimensions of age-related disability 1982 to 1994 in the US elderly population. J Gerontol: Bio Sci 1998;53A:B59-B70.
24. Kempen GI, van Heuvelen MJ, van Sonderen E, van den Brink RH, Kooijman AC, Ormel J. The relationship of functional limitations to disability and the moderate effect of psychological attributes in community dwelling older persons. Soc Sci Med 1999;48:1161-72.
25. Femia EE, Zarit SH, Johansson B. The disablement process in very late life: A study of the oldest-old in Sweden. J Gerontol: Psycholog Sci 2001;56B:12-23.
26. Steen G, Sonn U, Börjesson Hanson A, Steen B. Cognitive function and functional ability: A cross-sectional and longitudinal study at ages 85 and 95 in a non-demented population. Aging Clin Exp Res 2001;13:68-77.
27. Freedman VA, Aykan H, Martin LG. Aggregate changes in severe cognitive impairment among older Americans: 1993 and 1998. J Gerontol: Soc Sci 2001;56B:S100-S111.
28. Verbrugge LM, Rennert C, Madans JH. The great efficacy of personal and equipment assistance in reducing disability. Am J Pub Health 1997;87:384-392.
29. Agree EM. The influence of personal care and assistive devices on the measurement of disability. Soc Sci Med 1999;48(4):427-43.
30. Robine JM, Jagger C, Mathers C, Crimmins E, Suzman R, editors. Determining health expectancies. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 2003.
31. Mormiche P. Les personnes dépendantes en institutions. INSEE première 1999;669:1-4.
32. Rodgers W, Miller B. A comparative analysis of ADL questions in surveys of older people. J Gerontol: Series B 1997;52B(special issue):21-36.
33. Kovar MG, Lawton MP. Functional disability: activities and instrumental activities of daily living. Ann Rev Geriat Gerontol 1994;14:51-75.
34. Glass T. Conjugating the 'tense' of function: Discordance among hypothetical, experimental and enacted function in older adults. The Gerontologist 1998;38(1):101-112.
35. Folstein MF., Folstein SE, McHugh PR. "Mini-mental state". A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiat Res 1975;12:189-198.
36. Katz S, Ford AB, Moskowitz RW, Jackson BA, Jaffe MW. Studies of illness in the aged. The index of ADL: A standardized measure of biological and psychosocial function. J Am Med Assoc 1963;185:914-919.
37. Anstey KJ, Luszcz MA, Sanchez L. A re-evaluation of the common factor theory of shared variance among age, sensory function and cognitive function in older adults. J Gerontol: Psycholog Sci 2001;56B:3-11.
38. Ravaud JF, Ville I. Les disparités de genre dans le repérage et la prise en charge des situations de handicap. Rev Française des Affaires Sociales 2003;1-2:227-254.
39. Cambois E, Robine JM, Hayward MD. Social inequalities in disability-free life expectancy in the French male population, 1980-1991. Demography 2001;38:513-524.
40. Crimmins E, Cambois E. Social inequalities in health expectancy. In Robine JM, Jagger C, Mathers C, Crimmins E, Suzman R, editors. Determining health expectancies. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 2003. pp 111-126.