Habitat shift of a native darter Etheostoma olmstedi (Teleostei: Percidae) in sympatry with a non-native darter Etheostoma zonale

American Midland Naturalist

Volumn 154, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 166-177

  Van Snik Gray, Ellen ^a   Kellogg, Karen A ^a,b   Stauffer Jr , Jay R ^a,c  

^a PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b SKIDMORE COLLEGE   (United States)

^c NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HABITAT USE; INTERSPECIFIC COMPETITION; INTRODUCED SPECIES; NATIVE SPECIES; NICHE BREADTH;

NORTH AMERICA; SUSQUEHANNA RIVER; UNITED STATES; WESTERN HEMISPHERE; WORLD;

ETHEOSTOMA OLMSTEDI; ETHEOSTOMA ZONALE; PERCIDAE; PISCES; TELEOSTEI;

EID: 22744436634     PISSN: 00030031     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1674/0003-0031(2005)154[0166:hsoand]2.0.co;2     Document Type: Article

References (70)

1. BOVEE, K. D. 1986. Development and evaluation of habitat suitability criteria for use in the instream flow incremental methodology. Instream flow information paper no. 21. Biol. Rep., 86:1-28.
2. BROWN, L. R. AND A. M. BRASHER. 1995. Effects of predation by Sacramento squawfish (Ptychocheilus grandis) on habitat choice of California roach (Lavinia symmetricus) and rainbow trout (Oncorhnchus mykiss) in artificial streams. Can. J. Fish. Aqual. Sci., 52:1639-1646.
3. _ AND P. B. MOYLE. 1997. Invading species in the Eel River, California: successes, failures, and relationships with resident species. Env. Biol Fish., 49:271-291.
4. COLWELL, R. K. AND K. J. FUTUYMA. 1971. On the measurement of niche breadth and overlap. Ecology, 52:567-576.
5. COURTENAY, W. R., JR. 1995. The case for caution with fish introductions, p. 413-424. In: H. L. Schramm, Jr. and R. G. Piper (eds.). Uses and effects of cultured fishes in aquatic ecosystems. American Fisheries Society Symposium 15, Bethesda, Maryland.
6. _, D. A. HENSLEY, J. N. TAYLOR AND J. A. MCCANN. 1986. Distribution of exotic fishes in North America, p. 675-698. In: C. H. Hocutt and J. R. Stauffer, Jr. (eds.). The zoogeography of North American freshwater fishes. Wiley-Interscience, New York, New York.
7. _ AND J. R. STAUFFER, JR. 1990. The introduced fish problem and the aquarium fish industry. J. World Aquaculture Soc., 21:125-159.
8. _ AND P. B. MOYLE. 1996. Biodiversity, fishes, and the introduction paradigm, p. 239-252. In: R. C. Szaro and D. W. Johnston (eds.). Biodiversity in managed landscapes. Oxford University Press, New York, New York.
9. CROWDER, L. B. 1984. Character displacement and habitat shift in a native Cisco in southeastern Lake Michigan: evidence for competition? Copeia, 1984:878-883.
10. _ AND H. L. CRAWFORD. 1984. Ecological shifts in resource use by bloaters in Lake Michigan. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc., 113:737-743.
11. DAY, R. W. AND G. P. QUINN. 1989. Comparisons of treatments after an analysis of variance in ecology. Ecol. Monogr., 59:433-463.
12. DENONCOURT, R. F., C. H. HOCUTT AND J. R. STAUFFER, JR. 1975. Extensions of the known ranges of Ericymba buccata Cope and Etheostoma zonale (Cope) in the Susquehanna River drainage. J. Penn. Acad. Sci., 49:45-46.
13. DOUGLAS, M. E., P. C. MARSH AND W. L. MINKLEY. 1994. Indigenous fishes of western North America and the hypothesis of competitive displacement: Meda fulgida (Cyprinidae) as a case study. Copeia, 1994:9-19.
14. EHRLICH, P. R. 1984. Which animal will invade? p. 79-95. In: H. A. Mooney and J. A. Drake (eds.). Ecology of biological invasions of North America and Hawaii. Springer-Verlag, New York, New York.
15. FAUSCH, K. D. 1988. Tests of competition between native and introduced salmonids in streams: what have we learned? Can. J. Fish. Aqual. Sci., 45:2238-2246.
16. GATZ, A. J., JR., M. J. SALE AND J. M. LOAR. 1987. Habitat shifts in rainbow trout: competitive influences of brown trout. Oecologia, 74:7-19.
17. GRAY, E. S., J. M. BOLTZ, K. A. KELLOGG AND J. R. STAUFFER, JR. 1997. Food resource partitioning by nine sympatric darter species. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc., 126:822-840.
18. _ AND J. R. STAUFFER, JR. 2001. Substrate choice by three species of darters in an artificial stream: Effects of a non-native species. Copeia, 2001:254-261.
19. GREENBERG, L. A. 1988. Interactive segregation between the stream fishes Etheostoma simoterum and E. rufilineatum. Oikos, 51:193-202.
20. _. 1994. Effects of predation, trout density and discharge on habitat use by brown trout, Salmo trutta, in artificial streams. Freshwater Biology, 32:1-11.
21. _, E. BERGMAN AND A. G. EKLOV. 1997. Effects of predation and intraspecific interactions on habitat use and foraging by brown trout in artificial streams. Ecol. Freshwater Fish, 6:16-26.
22. HARDING, J. M., A. J. BURKY AND C. M. WAY. 1998. Habitat preferences of the rainbow darter, Etheostoma caeruleum, with regard to microhabitat velocity shelters. Copeia, 1998:988-997.
23. HERBOLD, B. AND P. B. MOYLE. 1986. Introduced species and vacant niches. Am. Nat., 128:751-760.
24. HINDAR, K., B. JONSSON, J. H. ANDREW AND T. G. NORTHCOTE. 1988. Resource utilization of sympatric and experimentally allopatric cutthroat trout and Dolly Varden charr. Oecologia, 74:481-491.
25. HOCUTT, C. H. AND P. S. HAMBRICK. 1973. Hybridization between the darters Percina crassa roanoka and Percina oxyrhyncha (Percidae, Etheostomatini), with comments on the distribution of Percina crassa. Am. Midl. Nat., 90:397-405.
26. HUBBS, C. AND H. J. BRODRICK. 1963. Current abundance of Gambusia gaigei, an endangered fish species. Southwest. Nat., 8:46-48.
27. HURLBERT, S. H. 1978. The measurement of niche overlap and some relatives. Ecology, 59:67-77.
28. HUTCHINSON, G. E. 1957. Concluding remarks. Cold Spring Harbor Symp. Quantit. Biol., 22:415-427.
29. KELLOGG, K. A., J. R. STAUFFER, JR., E. S. VAN SNIK AND J. M. BOLTZ. 1997. Interpopulation variation in darter oocyte production. J. Freshw. Ecol., 12:329-337.
30. KESSLER, R. K., A. F. CASPER AND G. K. WEDDLE. 1995. Temporal variation in microhabitat use and spatial relations in the benthic fish community of a stream. Am. Midl. Nat., 134:361-370.
31. KNEIB, R. T. 1972. The effect of man's activity on the distribution of five stream fishes in Little Pine Creek, Pennsylvania. J. Penn. Acad. Sci., 46:49-51.
32. LASSUY, D. R. 1995. Introduced species as a factor in extinction and endangerment of native fish species, p. 391-396. In: H. L. Schramm, Jr. and R. G. Piper (eds.). Uses and effects of cultured fishes in aquatic ecosystems. American Fisheries Society Symposium 15, Bethesda, Maryland.
33. LEARY, R. F., F. W. ALLENDORF AND S. H. FORBES. 1993. Conservation genetics of Bull trout in the Columbia and Klamath River drainages. Conserv. Biol., 7:856-865.
34. _, F. W. ALLENDORF AND G. K. SAGE. 1995. Hybridization and introgression between introduced and native fish, p. 91-101. In: H. L. Schramm, Jr. and R. G. Piper (eds.). Uses and effects of cultured fishes in aquatic ecosystems. American Fisheries Society Symposium 15, Bethesda, Maryland.
35. LEMLY, A. D. 1985. Suppression of native fish populations by green sunfish in first-order streams of Piedmont North Carolina. Trans. Amer. Fish. Soc., 114:705-712.
36. LEVINS, R. 1968. Evolution in changing environments: some theoretical explorations. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey. 120 p.
37. LI, H. W. AND P. B. MOYLE. 1981. Ecological analysis of species introductions into aquatic systems. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc., 110:772-782.
38. MAGNAN, P. AND G. J. FITZGERALD. 1984. Mechanisms responsible for the niche shift of brook charr Salvelinus fontinalis Mitchill, when living sympatrically with creek chub, Semotilus atromaculatus Mitchill. Can. J. Zool., 62:1548-1555.
39. MARTIN, F. D. 1984. Diets of four sympatric species of Etheostoma (Pisces: Percidae) from southern Indiana: interspecific and intraspecific multiple comparisons. Envir. Biol. Fish., 11:113-120.
40. MEFFE, G. K. 1985. Predation and species replacement in American southwestern fishes: a case study. Southw. Nat., 30:173-187.
41. _, D. A. HENDRICKSON AND W. L. MINCKLEY. 1983. Factors resulting in decline of the endangered Sonoran topminnow Poeciliopsis occidentalis (Atheriniformes: Poeciliidae) in the United States. Biolog. Conserv., 25:135-159.
42. MITCHELL, C. P. 1986. Effects of introduced grass carp on populations of two species of small native fishes in a small lake. New Zealand J. Mari. and Freshwater Res., 20:219-230.
43. MOORE, S. E., B. RIDLEY AND G. L. LARSON. 1983. Standing crops of brook trout concurrent with removal of rainbow trout from selected streams in Great Smoky Mountains National Park. N. Am. J. Fish. Manag., 3:72-80.
44. MOYLE, P. B. 1976. Fish introductions in California: history and impact on native fishes. Biol. Conser., 9:101-118.
45. _. 1984. Fish introductions into North America: patterns and ecological impact, p. 27-43. In: H. A. Mooney and J. A. Drake (eds.). Ecology of biological invasions of North America and Hawaii. Springer-Verlag, New York, New York.
46. _, H. W. LI AND B. A. BARTON. 1986. The Frankenstein effect: impact of introduced fishes on native fishes in North America, p. 415-426. In: R. H. Stroud (ed.). Fish culture in fisheries management. American Fisheries Society, Bethesda, Maryland.
47. _ AND T. LIGHT. 1996. Fish invasions in California: do abiotic factors determine success? Ecology, 77:1666-1670.
48. _, P. K. CRAIN, K. WHITENER AND J. F. MOUNT. 2003. Alien fishes in natural streams: fish distribution, assemblage structure, and conservation in the Cosumnes River, California, U.S.A. Env. Biol. Fish., 68:143-162.
49. PETERSON, D. P. AND K. D. FAUSCH. 2003. Upstream movement by nonnative brook trout (Salvelinus fontinalis) promotes invasion of native cutthroat trout (Oncorhynchus clarki) habitat. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci., 60:1502-1516.
50. PIMM, S. L. 1987. Determining the effects of introduced species. Trends in Ecol. Evol., 2:106-108.
51. POLIS, G. A. 1984. Age structure component of niche width and intraspecific resource partitioning: can age groups function as ecological species? Am. Nat., 123:541-564.
52. RAESLY, R. L. 1991. Genetic and morphological consequences of a founder event in an introduced population of the banded darter, Etheostoma zonale (Cope) (Teleostei: Percidae). Unpubl. Ph.D. Dissertation, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania.
53. _, J. R. STAUFFER, JR. AND R. F. DENONCOURT. 1990. Hybridization between Etheostoma zonale and Etheostoma olmstedi (Teleostei: Percidae) following an introduction event. Copeia, 1990:584-588.
54. RAHEL, F. J. 2000. Homogenization of fish faunas across the United States. Science, 288:854-856.
55. Ross, S. T. 1991. Mechanisms structuring stream fish assemblages: are there lessons from introduced species? Env. Biol. Fish., 30:359-368.
56. SAS INSTITUE, INC. 1996. SAS/STAT software: changes and enhancements for release 6. 12. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, North Carolina, 168 p.
57. SCHLOSSER, I. J. 1987. The role of predation in age- and size-related habitat use by stream fishes. Ecology, 68:651-659.
58. _ AND L. A. TOTH. 1984. Niche relationships and population ecology of rainbow (Etheostoma caeruluem) and fantail (Etheostoma flabellare) darters in a temporally variable environment. Oikos, 42:229-238.
59. SCHOENER, T. W. 1974. Resource partitioning in ecological communities. Science, 185:27-39.
60. SCHOENHERR, A. A. 1981. The role of competition in the replacement of native fishes by introduced species, p. 173-203. in: R. J. Naiman and D. L. Soltz (eds.). Fishes in North American deserts. John Wiley and Sons, New York, New York.
61. SIMBERLOFF, D. AND P. STILING. 1996. How risky is biological control? Ecology, 77:1965-1974.
62. STAUFFER, J. R., JR., J. M. BOLTZ, K. A. KELLOOG AND E. S. VAN SNIK. 1996. Microhabitat partitioning in a diverse assemblage of darters in the Allegheny River system. Env. Biol. Fish., 46:37-44.
63. TAYLOR, J. N., W. R. COURTENAY, JR. AND J. A. MCCANN. 1984. Known impacts of exotic fishes in the continental United States, p. 322-373. In: W. R. Courtenay, Jr. and J. R. Stauffer, Jr. (eds.). Distribution, biology and management of exotic fishes. John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, Maryland.
64. TAYLOR, C. M. 1996. Abundance and distribution within a guild of benthic stream fishes: local processes and regional patterns. Freshwater Biology, 36:385-396.
65. TOWNSEND, C. R. 1991. Exotic species management and the need for a theory of invasion ecology. New Zealand J. Ecol., 15:1-3.
66. _ AND T. A. CROWL. 1991. Fragmented population structure in a native New Zealand fish: an effect of introduced brown trout? Oikos, 61:347-354.
67. VOGT, G. F., JR. AND T. G. COON. 1990. A comparison of the foraging behavior of two darter (Etheostoma) species. Copeia, 1990:41-49.
68. WERNER, E. E. 1984. The mechanisms of species interactions and community organization in fish, p. 360-382. In: D. R. Strong, D. Simberloff, L. G. Abele and A. B. Thistle (eds.). Ecological communities: conceptual issues and the evidence. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey.
69. WHITE, M. M. AND N. ASPINWALL. 1984. Habitat partitioning among five species of darters (Percidae: Etheostoma), p. 55-60. In: D. G. Lindquist and L. M. Page (eds.). Environmental biology of darters. Dr W. Junk Publishers, Boston, Massachusetts.
70. ZARET, T. M. AND R. T. PAINE. 1973. Species introduction in a tropical lake. Science, 182:449-455.