Dynamical vs. judgmental comparison: Hysteresis effects in motion perception

Spatial Vision

Volumn 18, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 317-335

  Hock, Howard S ^a   Bukowski, Lori ^a   Nichols, David F ^a   Huisman, Avia ^a   Rivera, Mireya ^a  

^a FLORIDA ATLANTIC UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Apparent motion; Comparison; Dynamics; Hysteresis; Judgment; Motion; Motion quartet

Indexed keywords

COGNITIVE SYSTEMS; COMPUTATIONAL METHODS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DYNAMICS; HYSTERESIS; MOTION ESTIMATION;

APPARENT MOTION; COMPARISON; JUDGMENT; MOTION QUARTET;

SENSORY PERCEPTION;

ARTICLE; ATTENTION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; HUMAN; MOVEMENT PERCEPTION; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOPHYSICS; VISUAL ILLUSION;

ATTENTION; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; HUMANS; MOTION PERCEPTION; OPTICAL ILLUSIONS; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PSYCHOPHYSICS;

EID: 22744435489     PISSN: 01691015     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1163/1568568054089393     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Adelson, E. H. and Bergen, J. R. (1985). Spatio-temporal energy models for the perception of motion, J. Opt. Soc. Amer. A 2, 284-299.
2. Busemeyer, J. and Townsend, J. T. (1993). Decision field theory: a dynamic cognition approach to decision making, Psychological Review 100, 432-459.
3. Eastman, K. and Hock, H. S. (1999). Bistability in the perception of motion and stationarity: effects of temporal asymmetry, Perception and Psychophysics 61, 1055-1065.
4. Fender, D. and Julesz, B. (1967). Extension of Panum's fusional area in binocularly stabilized vision, J. Opt. Soc. Amer. 57, 819-830.
5. Fisher, G. H. (1967). Measuring ambiguity, Amer. J. Psychol. 80, 541-547.
6. Foster, D. H. (1983). Visual discrimination, categorical identification, and categorical rating in brief displays of curved lines: implications for discrete encoding processes, J. Exper. Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 9, 785-806.
7. Gephstein, S. and Kubovy, M. (2004). Stability and change in perception: spatial organization in temporal context, Exper. Brain Res. (in press).
8. Gilroy, L., Hock, H. S. and Ploeger, A. (2001). Differential activation solution to the motion correspondence problem, Perception and Psychophysics 63, 847-861.
9. Gorea, A. and Lorenceau, J. (1984). Perceptual bistability with counterphase gratings, Vision Research 24, 1321-1331.
10. Green, D. M. and Swets, J. A. (1966). Signal Detection Theory and Psychophysics. John Wiley, New York.
11. Hock, H. S., Kelso, J. A. S. and Schöner, G. (1993). Bistability and hysteresis in the organization of apparent motion patterns, J. Exper. Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 19, 63-80.
12. Hock, H. S., Kogan, K. and Espinoza, J. K. (1997). Dynamic, state-dependent thresholds for the perception of single-element apparent motion: bistability from local cooperativity, Perception and Psychophysics 59, 1077-1088.
13. Hock, H. S., Schöner, G. and Giese, M. (2003). The dynamical foundations of motion pattern formation: stability, selective adaptation, and perceptual continuity, Perception and Psychophysics 65, 429-457.
14. Hoeth, F. (1968). Bevorzugte Richtungen bei stroboskopischen Alternativbewegungen [Preferred directions in stroboscopic alternative motion], Psychologische Beitrage 16, 494-527.
15. Kelly, D. H. (1966). Frequency doubling in visual responses, J. Opt. Soc. Amer. 56, 1628-1633.
16. Kelso, J. A. S. (1995). Dynamic Patterns: The Self-organization of Brain and Behavior. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, USA.
17. Kulikowski, J. J. (1971). Effect of eye movements on the contrast sensitivity of spatio-temporal patterns, Vision Research 11, 261-273.
18. Kruse, P., Stadler, M. and Wehner, T. (1986). Direction and frequency specific processing in the perception of long-range apparent movement, Vision Research 26, 327-335.
19. Levinson, E. and Sekuler, R. (1975). The independence of channels in human vision selective for direction of movement, J. Physiology 250, 347-366.
20. Nichols, D. F. and Hock, H. S. (2002). A dynamical account of motion and non-motion perception for counterphase sine gratings. Presented at the Annual Meeting of the Vision Sciences Society, Sarasota, FL.
21. Ramachandran, V. S. and Anstis, S. M. (1985). Perceptual organization in multistable apparent motion, Perception 14, 135-143.
22. Tuller, B., Case, P., Ding, M. and Kelso, J. A. S. (1994). The nonlinear dynamics of speech categorization, J. Exper. Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 20, 3-16.
23. Ullman, S. (1979). The Interpretation of Visual Motion. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, USA.
24. Usher, M. and McLelland, J. L. (2001). The time course of perceptual choice: the leaking competing accumulator model, Psychological Review 108, 550-592.
25. van Santen, J. P. and Sperling, H. G. (1985). Elaborated Reichardt detectors, J. Opt. Soc. Amer. A 2, 300-320.
26. von Schiller, P. (1933). Stoboskopische Alternativbewegungen [Stroboscopic alternative motion], Psychologische Forschung 17, 179-214.
27. Watson, A. B. and Ahumada, A. J. (1985). Model of human visual-motion sensing, J. Opt. Soc. Amer. A 2, 322-341.
28. Williams, D., Phillips, G. and Sekuler, R. (1986). Hysteresis in the perception of motion direction as evidence for neural cooperativity, Nature 324, 253-255.