Inferring property selection pressure from positional residue conservation

Applied Bioinformatics

Volumn 3, Issue 2-3, 2004, Pages 167-179

  Hoberman, Rose ^a   Klein Seetharaman, Judith ^a,b   Rosenfeld, Roni ^a  

^a Carnegie Mellon University   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

NEF PROTEIN; VIRUS ENVELOPE PROTEIN; VIRUS PROTEIN;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ARTICLE; BIOINFORMATICS; COMPUTER MODEL; COMPUTER PROGRAM; ENVELOPE GENE; GENETIC CONSERVATION; GENETIC MODEL; GENETIC SELECTION; HUMAN IMMUNODEFICIENCY VIRUS 1; PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE;

ALGORITHMS; AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; AMINO ACIDS; CONSERVED SEQUENCE; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE DATA; PROTEINS; SELECTION (GENETICS); SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, PROTEIN; SEQUENCE HOMOLOGY, AMINO ACID;

HUMAN IMMUNODEFICIENCY VIRUS 1;

EID: 22744431915     PISSN: 11755636     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2165/00822942-200403020-00011     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Oliveira L, Paiva P, Paiva A, et al. Identification of functionally conserved residues with the use of entropy-variability plots. Proteins 2003; 52: 544-52
2. Oliveira L, Paiva P, Paiva A, et al. Sequence analysis reveals how G protein-coupled receptors transduce the signal to the G protein. Proteins 2003; 52: 553-60
3. Grigoriev I, Kim S. Detection of protein fold similarity based on correlation of amino acid properties. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1999; 96: 14318-23
4. Mathura V, Schein C, Braun W. Identifying property based sequence motifs in protein families and super-families: application to DNase-1 related endonucleases. Bioinformatics 2003; 19: 1381-90
5. Ouzounis C, Perez-Irratxeta C, Sander C, et al. Are binding residues conserved? Pac Symp Biocomput. 1998;:401-12
6. Villar H, Kauvar L. Amino acid preferences at protein binding sites. FEBS Lett 1994; 349: 125-30
7. Lichtarge O, Bourne H, Cohen F. An evolutionary trace method defines binding surfaces common to protein families. J Mol Biol 1996; 257: 342-58
8. Pei J, Grishin N. AL2CO: calculation of positional conservation in a protein sequence alignment. Bioinformatics 2001; 17: 700-12
9. Valdar W. Scoring residue conservation. Proteins 2002; 48: 227-41
10. Shenkin P, Erman B, Mastrandrea L. Information-theoretical entropy as a measure of sequence variability. Proteins 1991; 11: 297-313
11. Sander C, Schneider R. Database of homology-derived protein structures and the structural meaning of sequence alignment. Proteins 1991; 9: 56-8
12. Gerstein M, Altman R. Average core structures and variability measures for protein families: application to the immunoglobulins. J Mol Biol 1995; 251: 161-75
13. Taylor W. The classification of amino acid conservation. J Theor Biol 1986; 119: 205-18
14. Zvelebil MJ Barton GJ Taylor WR, et al. Prediction of protein secondary structure and active sites using the alignment of homologous sequences. J Mol Biol 1987; 195: 957-61
15. Sjolander K, Karplus K, Brown M, et al. Dirichlet mixtures: a method for improving detection of weak but significant protein sequence homology. Comput Appl Biosci 1996; 12: 327-45
16. Koshi J, Mindell D, Goldstein R. Beyond mutation matrices: physical-chemistry based evolutionary models. Genome Inform Ser Workshop Genome Inform 1997; 7: 80-9
17. Wasserman L. All of statistics. New York: Springer, 2004
18. Durbin R, Eddy S, Krogh A, et al. Biological sequence analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998
19. Thompson J, Higgins D, Gibson T. CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res 1994; 22: 4673-80
20. Bruno W. Modeling residue usage in aligned protein sequences via maximum likelihood. Mol Biol Evol 1996; 13: 1368-74
21. Janin J, Wodak S, Levitt M, et al. Conformation of amino acid side-chains in proteins. J Mol Biol 1978; 125: 357-86
22. Kyte J, Doolittle RF. A simple method for displaying the hydropathic character of a protein. J Mol Biol 1982; 157: 105-32
23. Jones DD. Amino acid properties and side-chain orientation in proteins: a cross correlation approach. J Theor Biol 1975; 50: 167-83
24. Meek JL. Prediction of peptide retention times in high-pressure liquid chromatography on the basis of amino acid composition. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1980; 77: 1632-6
25. Bhaskaran R, Ponnuswamy PK. Positional flexibilities of amino acid residues in globular proteins. Int J Peptide Protein Res 1988; 32: 241-55
26. Klein P, Kanehisa M, DeLisi C. T Prediction of protein function from sequence properties: discriminant analysis of a data base. Biochim Biophys Acta 1984; 787: 221-6
27. Wilson KJ, Honegger A, Stotzel RP, et al. The behaviour of peptides on reverse-phase supports during high-pressure liquid chromatography. Biochem J 1981 Oct 1; 199 (1): 31-41
28. Cowan R, Whittaker RG. Hydrophobicity indices for amino acid residues as determined by high-performance liquid chromatography. Pept Res 1990 Mar-Apr; 3 (2): 75-80
29. Guy HR. T Amino acid side-chain partition energies and distribution of residues in soluble proteins. Biophys J 1985; 47: 61-70
30. Oobatake M, Kubota Y, Ooi T. Optimization of amino acid parameters for correspondence of sequence to tertiary structures of proteuins. Bull Inst Chem Res 1985; 63: 82-94
31. Vihinen M, Torkkila E, Riikonen P. Accuracy of protein flexibility predictions. Proteins 1994 Jun; 19 (2): 141-9
32. Karplus PA, Schulz GE. Prediction of chain flexibility in proteins. Naturwiss 1985; 72: 212-3
33. Prabhakaran M. The distribution of physical, chemical and conformational proper-ties in signal and nascent peptides. Biochem J 1990; 269: 691-6
34. Hutchens JO. Heat capacities, absolute entropies, and entropies of formation of amino acids and related compounds. In: Sober HA, editor. Handbook of biochemistry. 2nd ed. Cleveland (OH): Chemical Rubber Co., 1970: B60-1
35. Levitt M. A simplified representation of protein conformations for rapid simulation of protein folding. J Mol Biol 1976; 104: 59-107
36. Oobatake M, Ooi T. An analysis of non-bonded energy of proteins. J Theor Biol 1977; 67: 567-84
37. Grantham R. Amino acid difference formula to help explain protein evolution. Science 1974; 185: 862-4
38. Fauchere JL, Pliska V. Hydrophobic parameters pi of amino-acid side chains from the partitioning of N-acetyl-amino-acid amides. Eur J Med Chem 1983; 18: 369-75
39. Harris M. From negative factor to a critical role in virus pathogenesis: the changing fortunes of Nef. J Gen Virol 1996; 77 (Pt 10): 2379-92
40. Fackler OT, Kienzle N, Kremmer E, et al. Association of human immunodeficiency virus Nef protein with actin is myristoylation dependent and influences its subcellular localization. Eur J Biochem 1997; 247: 843-51
41. Franchini G, Robert-Guroff M, Ghrayeb J, et al. Cytoplasmic localization of the htlv-iii 3′ orf protein in cultured T-cells. Virology 1986; 155: 5939
42. Niederman TM, Hastings WE, Ratner L. Myristoylation-enhanced binding of the HIV-1 Nef protein to T-cell skeletal matrix. Virology 1993; 197: 4205
43. Freund J, Kellner R, Houthaeve T, et al. Stability and proteolytic domains of Nef protein from human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) type 1. Eur J Biochem 1994; 221: 811-9
44. Grzesiek S, Bax A, Clore GM, et al. The solution structure of HIV-1 Nef reveals an unexpected fold and permits delineation of the binding surface for the SH3 domain of Hck tyrosine protein kinase. Nat Struct Biol 1996; 3: 340-5
45. Lee CH, Saksela K, Mirza UA, et al. Crystal structure of the conserved core of HIV-1 Nef complexed with a Src family SH3 domain. Cell 1996; 85: 931-42
46. Freund J, Kellner R, Konvalinka J, et al. A possible regulation of negative factor (Nef) activity of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 by the viral protease. Eur J Biochem 1994; 223: 589-93
47. Geyer M, Munte CE, Schorr J, et al. Structure of the anchor-domain of myristoylated and non-myristoylated HIV-1 Nef protein. J Mol Biol 1999; 289: 123-38
48. Geyer M, Peterlin BM. Domain assembly, surface accessibility and sequence conservation in full length HIV-1 Nef. FEBS Lett 2001; 496: 91-5
49. Geyer M, Fackler OT, Peterlin BM. Structure-function relationships in HIV-1 Nef. EMBO Rep 2001; 2: 580-5
50. Wang S, York J, Shu W, et al. Interhelical interactions in the gp41 core: implications for activation of HIV-1 membrane fusion. Biochemistry 2002; 41: 7283-92
51. Kwong PD, Wyatt R, Robinson J, et al. Structure of an HIV gp120 envelope glycoprotein in complex with the CD4 receptor and a neutralizing human antibody. Nature 1998; 393: 648-59
52. Hartigan JA, Hartigan PM. The dip test of unimodality. Ann Stat 1985; 13: 70-84