Peer review: Modeling civil engineering practice, another way to improve learning

ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 9625-9636

  Hamilton, Scott R ^a  

^a UNITED STATES MILITARY ACADEMY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DATA REDUCTION; ENGINEERS; FAILURE ANALYSIS; ITERATIVE METHODS; LEARNING SYSTEMS; PROJECT MANAGEMENT; PUBLIC POLICY; STUDENTS;

ASSIGNMENTS; GRADUATES; METACOGNITION;

CIVIL ENGINEERING;

EID: 22644443622     PISSN: None     EISSN: 21535965     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (18)

1. Hooker, R., editor, The Code of Hammurabi. 1996, Washinton State University.
2. Murray, M.H., Building Networks through Peer Interaction. Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, 1999.125(4): p. 159-162.
3. Gandolfo, A., Motivating Students for Life-long Leaning: Developing Metacognition. Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, 2001.127(3): p. 93-97.
4. Johnson, R.T. and D.W. Johnson, eds. An Overview of Cooperative Learning. Creativity and Collaborative Learning, ed. J. Thousand, A. Villa, and A. Nevin. 1994, Brookes Press: Baltimore.
5. Felder, R.M., A Longitudinal Study of Engineering Student Performance and Retention. IV. Instructional Methods and Student Responses to Them. Journal of Engineering Education, 1995. 84(4): p. 361-367.
6. Matthews, R.S., et al., Building Bridges Between Cooperative And Collaborative Learning. Cooperative Learning and College Teaching Newsletter, 1996.6(1): p. 2-5.
7. Wankat, P.C. and F.S. Oreovicz, Teaching Engineering. 1993, New York: McGraw-Hill, Inc. 370.
8. Ngeow, K., Enhancing Student Thinking through Collaborative Learning. ERIC Digest, 1998.
9. Lowman, J., Mastering the Techniques of Teaching. 2nd ed. 1995, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. 344.
10. Cooper, J. and P. Robinson, Small-group Instruction in Science, Mathematics, Engineering and Technology (SMET) Disciplines: A Status Report and an Agenda for the Future. Journal of College Science Teaching, 1998.
11. Cooper, J.L., P. Robinson, and M. McKinney, Cooperative Learning in the Classroom. 2002, Network for Cooperative Learning in Higher Education.
12. Felder, R.M., G.N. Felder, and E.J. Dietz, A Longitudinal Study of Engineering Student Performance and Retention. V. Comparisons with Traditionally-Taught Students. Journal of Engineering Education, 1998. 87(4): p. 469-480.
13. Johnson, D.W., R.T. Johnson, and M.B. Stanne, Cooperative Learning Methods: A Meta-Analysis. 2000, University of Minnesota: Minneapolis, MN. p. 1-29.
14. Felder, R.M. and R. Brent, Cooperative Learning in Technical Courses: Procedures, Pitfalls, and Payoffs. 1994, ERIC Document Reproduction Service, ED 377038.
15. Light, R.J., The Harvard Assessment Seminars: Second Report. 1992, Harvard Graduate School of Education: Cambridge, MA.
16. Glaser, W., The Quality School-Managing Students Without Coercion. 1990, New York: Harper Perennial.
17. Gandolfo, A., E-mail: PEER REVIEW POLICY v 2.doc, S.R. Hamilton, Editor. 2004: West Point, NY.
18. Felder, R.M. and R. Brent, Effective Strategies for Cooperative Learning. Journal of Cooperation & Collaboration in College Teaching, 2001.10(2): p. 69-75.