Cochlear implant soft failures consensus development conference statement

Otology and Neurotology

Volumn 26, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 815-818

  Balkany, Thomas J ^a,o   Hodges, A V ^a   Buchman, C A ^b   Luxford, W M ^c   Pillsbury, C H ^b   Roland, P S ^d   Shallop, J K ^e   Backous, D D ^f   Franz, D ^g   Graham, J M ^h   Hirsch, B ⁱ   Luntz, M ^j   Niparko, J K ^k   Patrick, J ^l   Payne, S L ^a   Telischi, F F ^a   Tobey, E A ^d   Truy, E ^m   Staller, S ⁿ  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA   (United States)

^c HOUSE EAR INSTITUTE   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^e MAYO CLINIC   (United States)

^f VIRGINIA MASON MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^g MED EL GmbH   (Austria)

^h ROYAL NATIONAL THROAT NOSE AND EAR HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

ⁱ UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH   (United States)

^j TECHNION ISRAEL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Israel)

^k JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^l Research and Technology Labs   (Australia)

^m EDOUARD HERRIOT HOSPITAL   (France)

ⁿ ADVANCED BIONICS CORPORATION   (United States)

^o UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI EAR INSTITUTE   (United States)

more..

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANAMNESIS; AUDIOLOGY; BIOMEDICAL TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT; CLINICAL EXAMINATION; COCHLEA PROSTHESIS; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONSENSUS DEVELOPMENT; CONSERVATIVE TREATMENT; DEVICE REMOVAL; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; REIMPLANTATION; REVIEW; SYMPTOMATOLOGY;

COCHLEAR IMPLANTS; DEVICE REMOVAL; DIAGNOSTIC TECHNIQUES, OTOLOGICAL; EQUIPMENT FAILURE; HUMANS; REOPERATION;

EID: 22644434567     PISSN: 15317129     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.mao.0000178150.44505.52     Document Type: Review

References (19)

1. th symposium on Cochlear implants in Children, Dallas, TX, March 2005.
2. Tambyraja RR, Gutman MA, Megerian CA. Cochlear Implant complications. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2005;131:245-51.
3. Hoffman RA, Cohen NL. Complications of cochlear implant surgery. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl 1995;166:420-2.
4. Cochlear Implants in Adults and Children, National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Conference Statement, May 15-17, 1999. (Cochlear Implants in Adults and Children. NIH Consensus Statement Online, May 15-17, 1995; 13:1-30.)
5. Cullington H, Ed. Cochlear Implants: Objective Measures. London, Whurr Publishers, 2003.
6. Buchman CA, Higgins CA, Cullen R, Pillsbury HC. Revision cochlear implant surgery in patients with suspected device malfunction. Otol Neurotol 2004;25:504-10.
7. nd ed., Austin, TX: Pro.ed, 1991;39-140.
8. Henson AM, Slattery WH 3rd, Luxford WM, et al. Cochlear implant performance after reimplantation: a multicenter study. Am J Otol 1999;20:56-64.
9. Balkany TJ, Hodges AV, Gomez-Marin O, et al. Cochlear reimplantation. Laryngoscope 1999;109:351-5.
10. Hamzavi J, Baumgartner WD, Pok SM. Does cochlear reimplantation affect speech recognition? Int J Audiol 2002;41:151-6.
11. Parisier SC, Chute PM, Popp AL, et al. Outcome analysis of cochlear implant reimplantation in children. Laryngoscope 2001;111: 26-32.
12. Woolford TJ, Saeed SR, Boyd P, et al. Cochlear reimplantation. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl 1995;166:449-53.
13. Saeed SR, Ramsden RT, Hartley C, et al. Cochlear reimplantation. J Laryngol Otol 1995;109:980-5.
14. Alexiades G, Roland JT Jr, Fishman AJ, et al. Cochlear reimplantation: surgical techniques and functional results. Laryngoscope 2001;111:1608-13.
15. Miyamoto RT, Svirsky MA, Myres WA, et al. Cochlear implant reimplantation. Am J Otol Suppl 1997;18:560-1.
16. Fayad JN, Baino T, Parisier SC. Revision cochlear implant surgery: causes and outcome. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2004; 131:429-32.
17. th symposium on Cochlear implants in Children, Dallas, TX, March 2005.
18. Graham JM. Soft failures. Editorial In Cochlear Implants International, 2004;4:v-vi.
19. Hu N, Abbas PJ, Miller CA, Robinson BK, Nourski KV, Jeng FC, Abkes BA, Nichols JM. Related Articles, Auditory response to intracochlear electric stimuli following furosemide treatment. Hear Res 2003;185:77-89.