Electronic implementation of guidelines in the EsPeR system: A knowledge specification method

International Journal of Medical Informatics

Volumn 74, Issue 7-8, 2005, Pages 597-604

  Colombet, Isabelle ^a   Aguirre Junco, Angel Ricardo ^a   Zunino, Sylvain ^a   Jaulent, Marie Christine ^a   Leneveut, Laurence ^a   Chatellier, Gilles ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ PARIS DESCARTES   (France)

Author keywords

Clinical decision support system; Clinical practice guidelines; Knowledge representation

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMS; DECISION MAKING; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; RISK ASSESSMENT; WORLD WIDE WEB;

CLINICAL GUIDELINES; COMPUTER SCIENTISTS; COMPUTERIZATION; WEB-BASED DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS;

HEALTH CARE;

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; AUTOMATION; COMPUTER SYSTEM; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM; ELECTRONICS; PHYSICIAN; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PREVENTIVE MEDICINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RISK ASSESSMENT; VALIDATION PROCESS;

DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS, CLINICAL; FRANCE; GUIDELINE ADHERENCE; INTERNET; PRACTICE GUIDELINES; PREVENTIVE MEDICINE; RISK ASSESSMENT;

EID: 22544481749     PISSN: 13865056     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2005.05.001     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. R.S. Hayward, M.C. Wilson, S.R. Tunis, E.B. Bass, and G. Guyatt Users' guides to the medical literature. VIII. How to use clinical practice guidelines. A. Are the recommendations valid? The evidence-based medicine working group JAMA 274 1995 570 574
2. The AGREE Collaboration. Guideline Appraisal Research and Evaluation, http://www.agreecollaboration.org (last accessed on 26 October 2004).
3. R.N. Shiffman, P. Shekelle, J.M. Overhage, J. Slutsky, J. Grimshaw, and A.M. Deshpande Standardized reporting of clinical practice guidelines: a proposal from the Conference on Guideline Standardization Ann. Intern. Med. 139 2003 493 498
4. J.M. Grimshaw, and I.T. Russell Effect of clinical guidelines on medical practice: a systematic review of rigorous evaluations Lancet 342 1993 1317 1322
5. T.M. Shaneyfelt, M.F. Mayo-Smith, and J. Rothwangl Are guidelines following guidelines? The methodological quality of clinical practice guidelines in the peer-reviewed medical literature JAMA 281 1999 1900 1905
6. G. Formoso, A. Liberati, and N. Magrini Practice guidelines: useful and "participative" method? Survey of Italian physicians by professional setting Arch. Intern. Med. 161 2001 2037 2042
7. R.S. Hayward, G.H. Guyatt, K.A. Moore, K.A. McKibbon, and A.O. Carter Canadian physicians' attitudes about and preferences regarding clinical practice guidelines CMAJ 156 1997 1715 1723
8. R.N. Shiffman, Y. Liaw, C.A. Brandt, and G.J. Corb Computer-based guideline implementation systems: a systematic review of functionality and effectiveness J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 6 1999 104 114
9. P. Gillois, G. Chatellier, M.C. Jaulent, I. Colombet, M. Fieschi, and P. Degoulet From paper-based to electronic guidelines: application to French guidelines Medinfo 10 2001 196 200
10. D.F. Lobach, and N. Kerner A systematic process for converting text-based guidelines into a linear algorithm for electronic implementation Proc. AMIA Symp. 2000 507 511
11. S.M. Maviglia, R.D. Zielstorff, M. Paterno, J.M. Teich, D.W. Bates, and G.J. Kuperman Automating complex guidelines for chronic disease: lessons learned J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 10 2003 154 165
12. M. Peleg, S. Tu, J. Bury, P. Ciccarese, J. Fox, and R.A. Greenes Comparing computer-interpretable guideline models: a case-study approach J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 10 2003 52 68
13. R.N. Shiffman Representation of clinical practice guidelines in conventional and augmented decision tables J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 4 1997 382 393
14. W. Moser, U. Heller, F.A. Gries, and R. Engelbrecht Enabling guidelines for computer-based decision support - process and tools Medinfo 10 2001 231 235
15. P.L. Miller Domain-constrained generation of clinical condition sets to help test computer-based clinical guidelines J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 8 2001 131 145
16. D. Wang, M. Peleg, D. Bu, M. Cantor, G. Landesberg, and E. Lunenfeld GESDOR - a generic execution model for sharing of computer-interpretable clinical practice guidelines AMIA Annu. Symp. Proc. 2003 694 698
17. I. Colombet, T. Dart, L. Leneveut, S. Zunino, J. Menard, and G. Chatellier A computer decision aid for medical prevention: a pilot qualitative study of the Personalized Estimate of Risks (EsPeR) system BMC Med. Inform. Decis. Making 3 2003 13
18. ANAES, Site of the 'Agence Nationale d'Evaluation et d'Accré dication en Santé', http://www.anaes.fr (last accessed on 6 March 2005).
19. T. Dart, Y. Xu, G. Chatellier, and P. Degoulet Computerization of guidelines: towards a "guideline markup language" Medinfo 10 2001 186 190
20. L. Ohno-Machado, J.H. Gennari, S.N. Murphy, N.L. Jain, S.W. Tu, and D.E. Oliver The guideline interchange format: a model for representing guidelines J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 5 1998 357 372
21. V.L. Patel, V.G. Allen, J.F. Arocha, and E.H. Shortliffe Representing clinical guidelines in GLIF: individual and collaborative expertise J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 5 1998 467 483
22. Y. Shahar, S. Miksch, and P. Johnson The Asgaard project: a task-specific framework for the application and critiquing of time-oriented clinical guidelines Artif. Intell. Med. 14 1998 29 51
23. J. Fox, N. Johns, C. Lyons, A. Rahmanzadeh, R. Thomson, and P. Wilson PROforma: a general technology for clinical decision support systems Comput. Methods Prog. Biomed. 54 1997 59 67
24. S. Quaglini, M. Stefanelli, G. Lanzola, V. Caporusso, and S. Panzarasa Flexible guideline-based patient careflow systems Artif. Intell. Med. 22 2001 65 80
25. A.X. Garg, N.K. Adhikari, H. McDonald, M.P. Rosas-Arellano, P.J. Devereaux, and J. Beyene Effects of computerized clinical decision support systems on practitioner performance and patient outcomes: a systematic review JAMA 293 2005 1223 1238
26. K. Kawamoto, C.A. Houlihan, E.A. Balas, and D.F. Lobach Improving clinical practice using clinical decision support systems: a systematic review of trials to identify features critical to success BMJ 330 2005 765
27. D.L. Hunt, R.B. Haynes, S.E. Hanna, and K. Smith Effects of computer-based clinical decision support systems on physician performance and patient outcomes: a systematic review JAMA 280 1998 1339 1346
28. G. Georg, B. Seroussi, and J. Bouaud Interpretative framework of chronic disease management to guide textual guideline GEM-encoding Stud. Health Technol. Inform. 95 2003 531 536