"the growth is there-but it's not that evident, is it!": A study in science delivery improvement

Journal of Science Teacher Education

Volumn 16, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 121-139

  Lewthwaite, Brian ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MANITOBA   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 22544476858     PISSN: 1046560X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10972-005-2661-2     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Appleton, K. (1992). Discipline knowledge and confidence to teach science. Research in Science Education, 22, 11-19.
2. Briscoe, C., & Peters, J. (1997). Teacher collaboration across and within schools: Supporting individual change in elementary science teaching. Science Education, 81(1), 51-67.
3. Davis, K. S. (2003). "Change is hard": What science teachers are telling us about reform and teacher learning of innovative practices. Science Education, 87(1), 3-31.
4. Dillon, J., Osborne, J., Fairbrother, R., & Kurina, L. (2000). A study into the professional views and needs of science teachers in primary and secondary schools in England. London: Council for Science and Technology.
5. Erickson, F. (1986). Qualitative methods in research on teaching. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (pp. 119-161). New York: Macmillan.
6. Edmonds, G., & Lewthwaite, B. E. (2002). Primary science curriculum delivery evaluation: A means to improvement. In R. K. Coll (Ed.), SAME papers 2002 (pp. 122-139). Hamilton, New Zealand: Centre for Science & Technology Education Research, University of Waikato.
7. Fraser, B. J. (1993). Research on classroom and school climate. In D. Gabel (Ed.), Handbook on research on science teaching and learning. New York: Cassell.
8. Fraser, B. J., Fisher, D. L., & McRobbie, C. J. (1996, April). Development, validation, and use of personal and class forms of a new classroom environment instrument. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York.
9. Fullan, M. (1991). The NEW meaning of educational change (2nd ed.). New York: Teachers College Press.
10. Fullan, M. (1993). Change forces: Probing the depths of educational reform. London: Falmer.
11. Garden, R. A. (Ed.). (1996). Science performance of New Zealand Form 2 and Form 3 students. Wellington, New Zealand: Ministry of Education.
12. Gulliver, P., & Lewthwaite, B. E. (2003). Improving science program delivery: A school-based study. Science Educational International, 13(2), 25-29.
13. Harlen, W. (1997). Primary teachers' understandings in science and its impact in the classroom. Research in Science Education, 27, 323-337.
14. Jonnassen, D. H., Peck, K. L., & Wilson, B. G. (1999). Learning with technology: A constructivist perspective. Columbus, OH: Merrill.
15. Kennedy, M. M. (1998, April). The relevance of content in preservice science education. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Research Association, San Diego, CA.
16. Lewthwaite, B. E. (2001). The development, validation, and application of a primary science curriculum implementation questionnaire. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Curtin University of Technology, Perth, Australia. http://adt.curtin.edu.au/theses/available/adt-WCU20030717.155648/.
17. Lewthwaite, B. E. (2004). "Are you saying I'm to blame?": An analysis of a principal's role in influencing science program delivery. Research in Science Education, 34, 115-137.
18. Lewthwaite, B. E., & Fisher, D. L. (2004). The application of a primary science curriculum evaluation questionnaire. Research in Science Education, 34, 55-70.
19. Lewthwaite, B. E., & Fisher, D. L. (in press). The development and validation of a primary science delivery evaluation questionnaire. International Journal of Science Education.
20. Lewthwaite, B. E., & MacIntyre, W. R. (2003). Professional science knowledge, interest, and self-efficacy: A vignette study. In R. K. Coll (Ed.), STER papers 2005 (pp. 53-80). Hamilton, New Zealand: University of Waikato, Centre for Science & Technology Education Research.
21. Lewthwaite, B. E., Stableford, J., & Fisher, D. L. (2001). Enlarging the focus on primary science delivery in New Zealand. In R. K. Coll (Ed.), SAME papers 2001 (pp. 213-238). Hamilton, New Zealand: University of Waikato, Centre for Science & Technology Education Research.
22. Loucks-Horsley, S., Hewson, P. W., Love, N., & Stiles, K. E. (1998). Designing professional development for teachers of mathematics and science. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
23. Marek, E. A., & Methaven, S. B. (1991). Effect of the learning cycle upon student and classroom teacher performance. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28, 41-53.
24. Ministry of Education. (1993). Science in the New Zealand curriculum. Wellington, New Zealand: Learning Media.
25. Payne, K., & Lewthwaite, B. E. (2002). Systematic curriculum review: A procedure for analysis. New Zealand Principal-Te Temuaki O Aotearoa, 18(2), 30-34.
26. Peers, E. P., Diezmann, C. M., & Watters, J. T. (2003). Supports and concerns for teacher professional growth during the implementation of a science curriculum innovation. Research in Science Education, 33, 89-110.
27. Stewart, D., & Prebble, T. (1985). Making it happen: A school development process. Palmerston North, New Zealand: Dunmore Press.
28. Stewart, D., & Prebble, T. (1993). The reflective principal: School development within a learning community. Palmerston North, New Zealand: ERDC Press.
29. Stinner, A. (1995). The current status of textbooks in schools. In S. M. Glynn & R. Duit (Eds.), Learning science in the schools: Research reforming practice (pp. 275-296). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
30. Suppovitz, J. A., Mayer, D. P., & Kahle, J. B. (2000). Promoting inquiry-based instructional practice: The longitudinal impact of professional development in the context of systemic reform. Educational Policy, 14, 331-356.
31. Suppovitz, J. A., & Turner, H. M. (2000). The effects of professional development on science teaching practices and classroom culture. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37, 963-980.
32. Tobin, K., Briscoe, C., & Holman, J. R. (1990). Overcoming constraints to effective elementary science teaching. Science Education, 74, 409-420.
33. van den Berg, R. (2001). Impact of inservice education in elementary science: Participants revisited a year later. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 12, 29-45.
34. Venville, G., Wallace, J., & Louden, W. (1998). A State-wide initiative: The Primary Science Teacher-Leader Project. Research in Science Education, 8, 17-38.