Partnerships in science learning: Museum outreach and elementary gifted education

Gifted Child Quarterly

Volumn 47, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 251-258

  Melber, Leah M ^a  

^a CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 22544476431     PISSN: 00169862     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/001698620304700402     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Abraham, L. M. (2001, March). Assessing the impact of field-based research projects on high school students. Paper presented at the meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, St. Louis, MO.
2. American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1993). Benchmarks for science literacy. New York: Oxford University Press.
3. California Department of Education. (2001a). 2000 Academic Performance Index (API) base report. Retrieved April 19, 2001, from http://api.cde.ca.gov/reports.html.
4. California Department of Education. (2001b). Enrollment. Retrieved July 25, 2001, from http://data1.cde.ca.gov/dataquest.
5. Chambers, D. W. (1983). Stereotypic images of the scientist: The Draw-A-Scientist Test. Science Education, 67, 253-265.
6. Cox, A. M., Lafferty, S., & Abraham, L. M. (1998, April). A study of authentic science learning: The museum research apprenticeship program. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego, CA.
7. Farenga, S. J., & Joyce, B. A. (1998). Science-related attitudes and science course selection: A study of high-ability boys and girls. Roeper Review, 20, 247-251.
8. Feldhusen, J. F. (1998). Programs for the gifted few or talent development for the many? Phi Delta Kappan, 79, 735-738.
9. Finson, K. E., Beaver, J. B., & Cramond, B. L. (1995). Development and field test of a checklist for the Draw-a-Scientist Test. School Science and Mathematics, 95, 195-205.
10. Fort, D. C. (1990). From gifts to talents in science. Phi Delta Kappan, 71, 664-671.
11. Gallagher, J. J. (1997). Least restrictive environment and gifted students. Peabody Journal of Education, 72, 153-165.
12. Glass, L. W. (1996). Gifted youth: A challenge for science education. In C. P. Benbow & D. Lubinski (Eds.), Intellectual talent: Psychometric and social issues (pp. 159-168). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
13. Gottfried, A. E., & Gottfried, A. W. (1996). A longitudinal study of academic intrinsic motivation in intellectually gifted children: Childhood through early adolescence. Gifted Child Quarterly, 40, 179-183.
14. Hyman, M. B., & Brody, L. (1984). Career guidance for the gifted. G/C/T, 7, 30-33.
15. Innamorato, G. (1998). Creativity in the development of scientific giftedness: Educational implications. Roeper Review, 21, 54-59.
16. Joyce, B. A., & Farenga, S. J. (1999). Informal science experience, attitudes, future interest in science, and gender of high-ability students: An exploratory study. School Science and Mathematics, 99, 431-437.
17. Mason, C. L., Kahle, J. B., & Gardner, A. L. (1991). Draw-A-Scientist Test: Future implications. School Science and Mathematics, 91, 193-198.
18. National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
19. Pizzini, E. L. (1985). Improving science instruction for gifted high school science students. Roeper Review, 7, 231-234.
20. Rogers, K. B. (1985). The museum and the gifted child. Roeper Review, 7, 238-241.
21. Rysiew, K. J., Shore, B. M., & Leeb, R. T. (1999). Multipotentiality, giftedness, and career choice: A review. Journal of Counseling and Development, 77, 423-430.
22. Scobee, J., & Nash, W. R. (1983). A survey of highly successful space scientists concerning education for gifted and talented students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 27, 147-151.
23. Symington, D., & Spurling, H. (1990). The "Draw a Scientist Test": Interpreting the data. Research in Science and Technological Education, 8, 75-77.
24. Willings, D. (1983). Issues in career choice for gifted students. Teaching Exceptional Children, 15, 226-33.