Creativity in the development of scientific giftedness: Educational implications

Roeper Review

Volumn 21, Issue 1, 1998, Pages 54-59

  Innamorato, Gino ^a  

^a Metropolitan Toronto French Lanugage School Board   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0040219089     PISSN: 02783193     EISSN: 1940865X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02783199809553932     Document Type: Article

References (136)

1. Aaron, J. (1994). Integrating music with core subjects. Music Educators Journal, 80(6), 33-36.
2. Adey, P. (1993). An exploration of long-term far-transfer effects following an extended intervention program in the high school science curriculum. Cognition and Instruction, (11)1, 1-29.
3. Adey, P. (1993). Cognitive acceleration: Review and Prospects. International Journal of Science Education, 10(2), 121-34.
4. Alexander, P. A. (1985). Gifted and nongifted students' perceptions of intelligence. Gifted Child Quarterly, 29(3), 137-43.
5. Arter, J. A. (1992). Using portfolios of student work in instruction and assessment. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice 11, 36-44.
6. Barron, F. (1976). Bisociates: artist and scientist in the act of creation. In: Astride the two cultures. New York: Random House.
7. Banbury, M. M. (1989). Designing and using peer nomination forms. Gifted Child Quarterly, 33(4), 161-64.
8. Barnett, L. (1979). The Universe and Dr. Einstein. New York: William Morrow and Company.
9. Barron, F. (1963). The psychology of creativity. Chicago: Encyclopedia Britannica.
10. Benbow, C. P. (1986). Mathematically talented males and females and achievement in the high school sciences. American Educational Research Journal, 23(3), 425-36.
11. Bereiter, C. (1994). Constructivism, Socioculturalism and Popper's World 3. Educational Researcher, 23(7), 21-23.
12. Belts, G. T. (1985). Autonomous learner model for the gifted and talented. Presentation at the 32nd Annual Convention of the National Association for Gifted Children. Denver, Colorado.
13. Blaisdell, M. L. (1984). Mainstreaming science: The history of science in a liberal arts curriculum. Liberal Education, 70(1), 27-34.
14. Bloom, B. S. (1986). Automaticity: The hands and feet of genius. Educational Leadership, 43(5), 70-77.
15. Brandwein, P. (1955). The gifted student as future scientist: the high school student and his commitment to science. New York: Harcourt.
16. Campbell, J. R. (1985). The phantom class: a viable approach of providing for gifted and talented high school science students. Roeper Review, 7(4), 228-31.
17. Carr, H. W. (1917). The philosophy of Benedetto Croce: the problem of art and history. London: Macmillan and Co., Limited.
18. Chauvin, J. C. (1984). Perceptions of leadership characteristics by gifted elementary students. Roeper Review, 6(4), 238-40.
19. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1996). Creativity: flow and the psychology of discovery and invention. New York: Harper Collins.
20. Cole, C. (1994). Operationalizing the notion of information as a subjective construct. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 45(7), 465-76.
21. Collins, A. (1991). Portfolios for assessing student learning in science: A new name for a familiar idea? In A.B. Champagne, B.E. Lovitts, & B. J. Calinger (Eds.), Assessment in the service of instruction. Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science.
22. Cross, T. L. (1992). Gifted high school students' advice to science teachers. Gifted Child Today, 15(5), 25-26.
23. Cross, R. T. (1992). Science education for China's elite secondary students: the example of chemistry. School Science & Mathematics, 92(6), 325-330.
24. Cross, B. (1990). A passion within reason: The human side of process. Science and Children, 27(4), 16-21.
25. Damasio, A. R. (1994). Descartes' Error. Emotion, Reason and the Human Brain. New York: Avon Books.
26. Detterman, D. K. (1993). Giftedness and intelligence; one and the same? Ciba Foundation Symposium, 178:22-31, 31-43.
27. Dettmer, P. (1985). Attitudes of school role groups toward learning needs of gifted students. Roeper Review, 7(4), 253-57.
28. Domaingue, R. (1992). Learning for discovery: Establishing the foundation. Journal of Scientific Exploration, 6(2), 11-22.
29. Donnelly, C. M. (1993). Use of analogy in learning scientific concepts. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition, 19(4), 975-87.
30. Einstein, A. (1946). Autobiographical Notes, translated by Paul A. Schilpp. The Library of Living Philosophers, vol. 8, Albert Einstein: Philosopher Scientist, edited by Paul A. Schilpp. New York: Open Court Publishing Company.
31. Ellerton, N. F. (1986). Children's made-up mathematics problems: a new perspective on talented mathematicians. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 17(3), 261-71.
32. Emerick, L. J. (1992). Academic underachievement among the gifted: Students' perceptions of factors that reverse the pattern. Gifted Child Quarterly, 36(3), 140-146.
33. Endean, L. (1983). The ideal science lesson (views expressed by pupils participating in a science extension course). Gifted Education International, 1(2), 120-25.
34. Endean, L. (1982). Observing thirty able youngsters at a science enrichment course. School Science Review, 64, 213-24.
35. Feldman, D. H. (1993). Child prodigies: A distinctive form of giftedness. Gifted Child Quarterly, 37(4), 188-93.
36. Ford, M. A. (1989). Students' perceptions of affective issues impacting the social emotional development and school performance of gifted/talented youngsters. Roeper Review, 11(3), 131-134.
37. Foster, W. (1986). The application of single subject research methods to the study of exceptional ability and extraordinary achievement. Gifted Child Quarterly, 30(1), 33-37.
38. Gagné, F. (1994). Are teachers really poor talent detectors? Gifted Child Quarterly, 38(3), 124-26.
39. Galbraith, J. (1985). The eight great gripes of gifted kids: responding to special needs. Roeper Review, 8(1), 15-18.
40. Gallagher, S. et al. (1992). The effects of problem-based learning on problem solving. Gifted Child Quarterly, 36(4), 195-200.
41. Gallagher, J. J. (1991). The gifted: a term with surplus meaning. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 14(4), 353-65.
42. Gallagher, J. J. (1987). How do you view education of the gifted young with special talents in arts and sciences? Should these studies be integrated? Roeper Review, 10(1), 47-52.
43. Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences. New York: Basic.
44. Geschwind, N. (1986). Cerebral Dominance: The Biological Foundations. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University.
45. Giovacchini, P. L. (1991). The creative person as maverick. Journal of the American Academy of Psychoanalysis, 19(2), 174-88.
46. Grinder, R. E. (1990). Sources of giftedness in nature and nurture: historical origins of enduring controversies. Gifted Child Quarterly, 34(2), 50-55.
47. Gross, M. U. M. (1989). The pursuit of excellence or the search for intimacy? The forced-choice dilemma of gifted youth. Roeper Review, 11(4), 189-94.
48. Guastello, S. (1992). Cognitive abilities and creative behaviours. Journal of Creative Behaviour, 26(4), 260-67.
49. Gustin, W. C. (1994). Mathematical and verbal reasoning as predictors of science achievement. Roeper Review, 16(3), 160-62.
50. Hamm, M. (1991). Portfolio assessment. Science Teacher, 58(5), 18-21.
51. Handel, R. D. (1994). Gifted women scientists: Voices of mothers and daughters. Gifted Education International, 9(3), 172-176.
52. Hankins, G. (1987). The paradox of expertise. Engineering Education, 77(5), 302-305.
53. Higham, S. J. (1984). Gifted adolescent females require differential treatment. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 8(1), 43-58.
54. Hinton, G. E. (1992). How neural networks learn from experience. Scientific American, 267(3), 144-51.
55. Hollinger, C. L. (1985). Self-perceptions of ability of mathematically talented female adolescents. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 9(3), 323-36.
56. Holton, G. (1971). On trying to understand scientific genius. American Scholar, 41:102-4.
57. Hoover, S. M. (1994). Scientific problem finding in gifted fifth-grade students. Roeper Review, 16(3), 156-59.
58. Hoover, S. M. (1989). The Purdue three stage model as applied to elementary science for the gifted. School Science and Mathematics, 89(3), 244-50.
59. Jeon, K. (1993). A study on mental health of scientifically gifted high school males and females. Gifted Education International, 9(2), 85-92.
60. Johnstone, A. H. (1991). Room for scientific thought. International Journal of Science Education, 13(2), 187-92.
61. Kandel, E. R. (1992). The biological basis of learning and individuality. Scientific American, 267(3), 78-86.
62. Karnes, F. A. (1989). Student leaders' and their parents' perceptions of the home environment. Gifted Child Quarterly, 33(4), 165-68.
63. Keating, D. P. (1990). Domain-General and Domain-Specific Processes in Proportional Reasoning: A Commentary on the "Merrill-Palmer Quarterly" Special Issue on Cognitive Development. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 36(3), 411-24.
64. Keating, D. P. (1974). Mathematical talent: discovery, description, and development: proceedings. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.
65. Kelly, K. (1992). Career maturity of young gifted adolescents: a replication study. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 16(1), 36-45.
66. Koestler, A. (1964). The act of creation. New York: Macmillan.
67. Kuhn, T.S. (1977). A function for thought experiments. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
68. Kwan, P. C. F. (1992). On a pedestal: Effects of intellectual giftedness and some implications for programme planning. Educational Psychology: An International Journal of Experimental Educational Psychology, 12(1), 37-62.
69. Laforgia, J. (1988). The affective domain related to science education and its evaluation. Science Education, 72(4), 407-21.
70. Lawson, A. E. (1983). Predicting science achievement: the role of developmental level, disembedding ability, mental capacity, prior knowledge, and beliefs, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 20(2), 117-29.
71. LeBuffe, J. R. (1993). Performance assessment. Science Teacher, 60(6), 46-48.
72. Leff, H. L. (1990). Dissolving barriers to teaching creative thinking (and meta-thinking). Teacher Education and Special Education, 13(1), 36-39.
73. Levine, E. S. (1986). Emotional needs of gifted children: A preliminary, phenomenological view. Creative Child and Adult Quarterly, 11(3), 156-65.
74. Leyden, M. B. (1994). Teaching science: A model thinker. Teaching Pre K-8, 24(4), 42-43.
75. Marek, E. A. (1990). Teachers' understanding and the use of the learning cycle. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27(9), 821-34.
76. Marjoram, T. (1994). Are/Should boys and girls gifted in mathematics be taught together? Gifted Education International, 9(3), 152-53.
77. Matthews, D. J. (1993). Linguistic giftedness in the context of domain-specific development. Education Exceptionality Canada, 3(3), 1-23.
78. McKay, M. D. (1993). The insidious dilemma of gifted in the regular classroom: No one wants to be a bad teacher. Gifted Child Today, 16(3), 40-41.
79. McGee, B. R. (1991). Academic Debate and the Rhetoric of Emancipation: Habermas and Instrumental Reality. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Speech Communication Association, Atlanta, GA.
80. Medawar, P. B. (1969). Induction and intuition in scientific thought. Philadelphia: American Philosophical Society.
81. Menuhin, Y. (1987). Art and science as related concepts: An attempt at their comparative anatomy as revealed in various fields of human endeavour. Roeper Review, 10(1), 24-28.
82. Midgett, J. (1983). Perceptions of gifted programming. Roeper Review, 5(3), 42-44.
83. Moon, S.M. & Feldhusen, J. F. (1994). The program for academic and creative enrichment (PACE): A followup study ten years later. In R. Subotnik & K. Arnold (Eds.), Beyond Terman: Recent longitudinal studies in gifted education (pp.375-400), New Jersey: Ablex.
84. Niaz, M. (1994). Pascual-Leone's theory of constructive operators as an explanatory construct in cognitive development and science achievement. Educational Psychology: An International Journal of Experimental Educational Psychology, 14(1), 23-43.
85. Niaz, M. (1993). Research and teaching: Problem solving in science. Journal of College Science Teaching, 23(1), 18-23.
86. Niaz, M. (1988). The information-processing demand of chemistry problems and its relation to Pascual-Leone's functional M-capacity. International Journal of Science Education, 10(2), 231-38.
87. Noble, K. D. (1992). But what about the prom? Students' perceptions of early college entrance. Gifted Child Quarterly, 36(2), 106-11.
88. Norman, G. R. (1992). The psychological basis of problembased learning: A review of the evidence. Academic Medicine, 67(9), 557-65.
89. O'Boyle, M. W. (1994). Concurrent finger-tapping in mathematically gifted males: Evidence for enhanced right hemisphere involvement during linguistic processing. Cortex, 30(3), 519-26.
90. O'Boyle, M. W. (1991). Enhanced right hemisphere activation in the mathematically precocious: A preliminary EEG investigation. Brain & Cognition, 17(2), 138-53.
91. Osborne, R. (1985). The generative learning model and its implications for science education. Studies in Science Education, 12, 59-87.
92. Pate, R. H., Jr. (1989). Perceptions held by academically talented high school students of teaching as a career. School Counsellor, 36(5), 352-58.
93. Perkins, D. N. (1992). Reasoning as imagination. Interchange, 16(1), 14-26.
94. Phenix, P. (1964). Realms of Meaning: The Fourth Realm: Synoetics and Moral Knowledge, (pp. 187-232). Toronto, Ontario: McGraw-Hill Series in Education.
95. Piirto, J. (1991). Why are there so few (creative women: visual artists, mathematicians, musicians)? Roeper Review, 13(3), 142-147.
96. Polanyi, M. (1962). Personal knowledge: Towards a post-critical philosophy. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
97. Popper, K. R. (1992). The logic of scientific discovery. New York: Routledge Publishing.
98. Porter, S. C. (1993). Graduates speak out: Gifted high school graduates note the actions that made a difference in their lives. Gifted Child Today, 16(6), 24-27.
99. Powell, P. M. (1987). Genius. Roeper Review, 10(2), 96-98.
100. Presmeg, N. C. (1986). Visualization and mathematical giftedness. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 17, 297-311.
101. Quaker, A. et al. (1990). Exploration: A way of learning science. London: Blackwell.
102. Puccio, G. J. (1991). William Duff's Eighteenth Century examination of original genius and its relationship to contemporary creativity research. Journal of Creative Behaviour, 25(1), 1-10.
103. Renzulli, J. (1977). The enrichment triad model: A guide for developing defensible program for the gifted and talented. Mansfield Centre, Connecticut: Creative Learning Press.
104. Riner, P. S. (1983). Establishing scientific methodology with elementary gifted children through field biology. G/C/T, 28, 46-49.
105. Roberts, D. J. et al. (1982). A comparison of the perceptions of gifted children and their parents concerning the child's academic, social, family characteristics. G/C/T, 24, 46-49.
106. Roe, A. (1961). The psychology of a scientist. Science, 134, 56-459.
107. Roe, A. (1952). A psychologist examines 64 eminent scientists. Scientific American, 185(5), 21-25.
108. Root-Bernstein, R. S. (1987). Tools of thought: Designing an integrated curriculum for lifelong learners. Roeper Review, 10(1), 17-21.
109. Rothenberg, A. (1976). The Creativity Question. Durham: Duke University Press.
110. Scobee, J. (1983). A survey of highly successful space scientists concerning education for gifted and talented students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 27(4), 147-51.
111. Shaughnessy, M. F. (1992). Personality and scientific promise. Psychological Reports, 70(3), 971-75.
112. Shepardson, D.P. (1992). Gender bias in female elementary teacher's perceptions of the scientific ability of students. Science Education, 76(2), 147-53.
113. Silverman, L. (1986). The IQ controversy: Conceptions and misconceptions. Roeper Review, 8(3), 136-40.
114. Smith, K. A. (1987). Educational engineering: Heuristics for improving learning effectiveness and efficiency. Engineering Education, 77(5), 274-79.
115. Span, P. (1986). Information processing by intellectually gifted pupils solving mathematical problems. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 17(3), 273-95.
116. Steinberg, R. (1990). What constitutes a "good" definition of giftedness? Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 14(3), 96-100.
117. Sternberg, R. J. (1982). Teaching scientific thinking to gifted children. Roeper Review, 4(4), 4-6.
118. Sternberg, R. J. (1977). Component processes in analogical reasoning. Psychological Review, 84:353-378.
119. Subotnik, R. F. (1993). Talent developed; Conversations with masters of the arts and sciences, Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 16(3), 311-22.
120. Subotnik, R. F. (1993). Adult manifestations of adolescent talent in science. Roeper Review, 15(3), 164-169.
121. Swang, J. (1993). Portfolios: Windows on learning. Ensuring success in science learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 21(8), 24-26.
122. Taylor, C. et al. (1975). Scientific Creativity: Its recognition and Development. New York: Robert E. Krieger Publishing Company.
123. Tamir, P. (1993). What makes a student a high achiever in science? Gifted Education International, 9(1), 24-32.
124. Thompson, R. F. (1986). The neurobiology of learning and memory. Science, 233(4767), 941-47.
125. Torrance, E. P. (1992). A national climate for creativity and invention. Gifted Child Today, 15(1), 10-14.
126. Uenishi, R. K. (1984). Creativity and originality in science. Impact of Science on Society, 34(2-3), 221-229.
127. VanTassel-Baska, J. et al. (1985). Toward developing an appropriate math/science curriculum for gifted learners. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 8(4), 257-72.
128. Wallace, T. (1987). Personality traits and childhood environments of eminent essayists. Gifted Child Quarterly, 31(2), 65-69.
129. West, T. G. (1991). In the mind's eye: Visual thinkers, gifted people with learning difficulties, computer images and the ironies of creativity. New York: Prometheus Books.
130. West, T. G. (1992). A future of reversals: Dyslexic talents in a world of computer visualization. Annals of Dyslexia, 42, 124-39.
131. Winchester, I. (1985). Creation and creativity in art and science. Interchange, 16(1), 70-76.
132. Yager, R. E. (1989). Assessing teaching/learning successes in multiple domains of science and science education. Science Education, 73(1), 45-58.
133. Yager, R. E. (1986). Features of a quality curriculum for school science. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 18(2), 133-146.
134. Yewchuk, C. (1991). The neglected minority: The emotional needs of gifted children. Education Canada, 31(4), 8-13.
135. Youniss, J. (1994). Vygotsky's fragile genius in time and place: Essay Review of Understanding Vygotsfcy: A Quest for Synthesis in Human Development, 37(2), 119-24.
136. Zielinski, E. J. (1990). Creativity and criticism. The components of scientific thought. Science Teacher, 57(8), 18-22.