Impaired spatial coding within objects but not between objects in prosopagnosia

Neurology

Volumn 65, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 270-274

  Barton, Jason J S ^a,b,c   Cherkasova, Mariya V ^a  

^a HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

^c Vancouver General Hospital Eye Care Centre   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BRAIN FUNCTION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; DEPTH PERCEPTION; FACE; FEMALE; FRONTAL LOBE; HUMAN; MALE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; OCCIPITAL CORTEX; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSOPAGNOSIA; SPATIAL DISCRIMINATION; SPATIAL ORIENTATION; TASK PERFORMANCE; TEMPORAL CORTEX;

EID: 22544460260     PISSN: 00283878     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000168901.98616.1c     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Rizzo M, Rotella D, Darling W. Troubled reaching after right occipito-temporal damage. Neuropsychologia 1992;30:711-722.
2. Pierrot-Deseilligny C, Gray F, Brunet P. Infarcts of both inferior parietal lobules with impairment of visually guided eye movements, peripheral inattention and optic ataxia. Brain 1986;109:81-97.
3. Humphreys G, Riddoch M. Separate coding of space within and between perceptual objects: evidence from unilateral visual neglect. Cogn Neuropsychol 1995;12:283-311.
4. Humphreys G. Neural representation of objects in space: a dual coding account. Phil Trans R Soc Lond B 1998;353:1341-1351.
5. Barton J, Press D, Keenan J, et al. Lesions of the fusiform face area impair perception of facial configuration in prosopagnosia. Neurology 2002;58:71-78.
6. Rhodes G. Looking at faces: first-order and second-order features as determinants of facial appearance. Perception 1988;17:43-63.
7. Barton J, Keenan J, Bass T. Discrimination of spatial relations and features in faces: effects of inversion and viewing duration. Br J Psychol 2001;92:527-549.
8. Rhodes G, Brake S, Atkinson A. What's lost in inverted faces? Cognition 1993;47:25-57.
9. Carey S. Becoming a face expert. Phil Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 1992;335:95-103.
10. Cooper A, Humphreys G. Coding space within but not between objects: evidence from Balint's syndrome. Neuropsychologia 2000;38:723-733.
11. Barton J, Cherkasova M, Press D, et al. Developmental prosopagnosia: a study of three patients. Brain Cogn 2003;51:12-30.
12. Barton J, Cherkasova M, Press D, et al. Perceptual function in prosopagnosia. Perception 2004;33:939-956.
13. Joubert S, Felician O, Barbeau E, et al. Impaired configurational processing in a case of progressive prosopagnosia associated with right temporal lobe atrophy. Brain 2003;126:2537-2550.
14. Barton J, Cherkasova M. Face imagery and its relation to perception and covert recognition in prosopagnosia. Neurology 2003;61:220-225.
15. Humphreys G, Riddoch M. Attention to within-object and between-object spatial representations: multiple sites for visual selection. Cogn Neuropsychol 1994;11:207-241.
16. Humphreys G, Heinke D. Spatial representation and selection in the brain: neuropsychological and computational constraints. Visual Cogn 1998;5:9-47.
17. Ungerleider L, Mishkin M. Two cortical visual systems. In: Ingle DJ, Mansfield RJW, Goodale MS, eds. The analysis of visual behaviour. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1982:549-586.
18. Milner A. Goodale M. The visual brain in action. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995.
19. Farah M, Levinson K, Klein K. Face perception and within-category discrimination in prosopagnosia. Neuropsychologia 1995;33:661-674.
20. Gauthier I, Behrmann M, Tarr MJ. Can face recognition really be dissociated from object recognition? J Cogn Neurosci 1999;11:349-370.
21. Kanwisher N. Domain specificity in face perception. Nat Neurosci 2000; 3:759-763.
22. Tarr MJ, Gauthier I. FFA: a flexible fusiform area for subordinate-level visual processing automatized by expertise. Nat Neurosci 2000;3:764-769.