The political determinants of federal expenditure at the state level

Public Choice

Volumn 123, Issue 1-2, 2005, Pages 95-113

  Hoover, Gary A ^a   Pecorino, Paul ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 22544453289     PISSN: 00485829     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11127-005-7524-z     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Anderson, G., & Tollison, R. D. (1991). Congressional influence and patterns of New Deal spending. Journal of Law and Economics, 34(April), 161-175.
2. Arrington, L. J. (1969). The New Deal in the West: A preliminary statistical inquiry. Pacific Historical Review, 38(August), 311-316.
3. Arrington, L. J. (1970). Western Agriculture and the New Deal. Agricultural History, 44(October), 337-53.
4. Atlas, C. M., Gilligan, T. A., Hendershott, R. J., & Zupan, M. A. (1995). Slicing the federal government net spending pie: Who wins, who loses, and why. American Economic Review, 85, 624-629.
5. Atlas, C. M., Hendershott, R. J., & Zupan, M. A. (1997). Optimal effort allocation by U.S. senators: The role of constituency size. Public Choice, 92, 221-229.
6. Bennett, J. T., & Mayberry, E. R. (1979). Federal tax burdens and grant benefits to states: The impact of imperfect representation. Public Choice, 34, 255-269.
7. Bickers, K. N., & Stein, R. M. (1991). Federal domestic outlays, 1983-1990: A data book. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.
8. Couch, J. F., & Shughart, W. F., II. (1998). The political economy of the New Deal. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
9. Fleck, R. K. (1999). The Value of the vote: A model and test of the effects of turnout on distributive policy. Economic Inquiry, 37, 609-623.
10. Fleck, R. K. (2001a). Population, land, economic conditions, and the allocation of New Deal spending. Explorations in Economic History, 38, 296-304.
11. Fleck, R. K. (2001b). Inter-party competition, intra-party competition, and distributive policy: A model and test using New Deal data. Public Choice, 108, 77-100.
12. Knight, B. (2003). Legislative representation, bargaining power, and the distribution of federal funds: Evidence from the U.S. senate. (Manuscript). Brown University.
13. Lee, F. E. (1998). Representation and public policy: The consequences of senate apportionment for the geographic distribution of federal funds. Journal of Politics, 60, 34-62.
14. Lee, F. E. (2000). Senate representation and coalition building in distributive politics. American Political Science Review, 94, 59-72.
15. Levitt, S. D., & Poterba, J. M. (1999). Congressional distributive politics and state economic performance. Public Choice, 99, 185-216.
16. Levitt, S. D., & Snyder, J. M., Jr. (1995). Political parties and the distribution of outlays. American Journal of Political Science, 39, 958-980.
17. McGillivray, A. V., Scammon, R. M., & Cook, R. (2001). America at the polls 1960-2000. Washington DC: CQ Press.
18. Moore, J. L., Preimesberger, J. P., & Tarr, D. R. (2001). Congressional quarterly's guide to U.S. elections. Washington DC: CQ Press.
19. Reading, D. C. (1973). New Deal activity and the states. Journal of Economic History, 36, 792-810.
20. Wallis, J. J. (1998). The political economy of New Deal spending revisited, again: With and without Nevada. Explorations in Economic History, 35, 140-170.
21. Wallis, J. J. (2001). The political economy of New Deal spending, yet again: A reply to Fleck. Explorations in Economic History, 38, 305-314.
22. Wright, G. (1974). The political economy of New Deal spending: An econometric analysis. Review of Economics and Statistics, 59, 30-38.