When is There Strength in Numbers?: A Study of Undergraduate Task Groups

College Teaching

Volumn 53, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 14-19

  Baker, Diane F ^a   Campbell, Connie M ^a  

^a MILLSAPS COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

cooperative learning; groups; self efficacy

Indexed keywords

EID: 22544445421     PISSN: 87567555     EISSN: 19308299     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3200/CTCH.53.1.14-19     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Dean, E. 1996. Teaching the proof process: A model of discovery learning. College Teaching 44 (2): 52–55.
2. Karau, S. J., and K. D. Williams. 1993. Social loafing: A meta-analytic review and theoretical integration. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 65:681–706.
3. Morgan, B. M. 2003. Cooperative learning in higher education: Undergraduate student reflections on group examinations for group grades. College Student Journal 37:40–50.
4. Onwuegbuzie, A. J., K. M. T. Collins, and S. Elbedour. 2003. Aptitude by treatment interactions and Matthew effects in graduate-level cooperative-learning groups. Journal of Educational Research 96: 217–31.
5. How to solve it Polya, G. 1973. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. (Orig. pub. 1945.)
6. Riggs, M. L., and P. A. Knight. 1994. The impact of perceived group success-failure on motivational beliefs and attitudes: A causal model. Journal of Applied Psychology 79:755–66.
7. Stajkovic, A. D., and F. Luthans. 1998. Self-efficacy and work-related performance: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin 124: 240–61.
8. Strom, P. S., and R. D. Strom. 2002. Overcoming limitations of cooperative learning among community college students. Community College Journal of Research and Practice 26:315–31.
9. Tien, L. T., V. Roth, and J. A. Kampmeier. 2002. Implementation of a peer-led team learning instructional approach in an undergraduate organic chemistry course. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 39:606–32.
10. Walker, C., and T. Angelo. 1998. A Collective effort classroom assessment technique: Promoting high performance in student teams. New Directions for Teaching and Learning 75:101–12.
11. Whetten, D. A., and K. S. Cameron. 2002. Developing management skills. 5th ed. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
12. Bandura, A. 1986. Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
13. Zimbardo, P. G., L. D. Butler, and V. A. Wolfe. 2003. Cooperative college examinations: More gain, less pain when students share information and grades. Journal of Experimental Education 71:101–25.
14. Gagne, R. M., L. J. Briggs, and W. W. Wager. 1992. Principles of instructional design. 4th ed. Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
15. Gist, M. E., and T. R. Mitchell. 1992. Self-efficacy: A theoretical analysis of its determinants and malleability. Academy of Management Review 17:183–211.
16. Janis, I. 1972. Victims of groupthink. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
17. Johnson, D. W., and R. T. Johnson. 1998. Cooperative learning returns to college. Change 30:26–36.
18. Bandura, A. 2000. Exercise of human agency through collective efficacy. Current Directions in Psychological Science 9:75–78.