Tensions in the research council-research community relationship

Science and Public Policy

Volumn 32, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 199-209

  Gulbrandsen, Magnus ^a  

^a NORDIC INSTITUTE FOR STUDIES IN INNOVATION   (Norway)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK; RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT;

EASTERN HEMISPHERE; EURASIA; EUROPE; NORTHERN EUROPE; NORWAY; SCANDINAVIA; WORLD;

EID: 22444440324     PISSN: 03023427     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3152/147154305781779524     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Arnold, E, S Kuhlman and B van der Meulen (2001), A Singular Council. Evaluation of the Research Council of Norway (Technopolis, Brighton).
2. Benner, M, and U Sandström (2000), "Institutionalizing the triple helix: research funding and norms in the academic system", Research Policy, 29(2), pages 291-301.
3. Braun, D (1993), "Who governs intermediate agencies? Principal agent relations in research policy-making", Journal of Public Policy, 13(1), pages 135-162.
4. Braun, D (1998), "The role of funding agencies in the cognitive development of science", Research Policy, 27(8), pages 807-821.
5. Braun, D (2003), "Lasting tensions in research policy-making - a delegation problem", Science and Public Policy, 30(5), October, pages 309-321.
6. Calvert, J (2004), "The idea of 'basic research' in language and practice", Minerva, 42(3), pages 251-268.
7. Foss Hansen, H (1995), "Organizing for quality - a discussion of different evaluation methods as means for improving quality in research", Science Studies, 8(1), pages 36-43.
8. Geuna, A (2001), "The changing rationale for European university research funding: are there negative unintended consequences?", Journal of Economic Issues, XXXV(3), pages 607-632.
9. Gulbrandsen, M (2000), "Between Scylla and Charybdis - and enjoying it? Organisational tensions and research work", Science Studies, 13(2), pages 52-76.
10. Gulbrandsen, M (2001), The Research Council of Norway and its different funding mechanisms: the experiences and views of researchers in universities, colleges and institutes, RCN Evaluation, Background Report no 1, Technopolis, Brighton.
11. Guston, D H (1996), "Principal-agent theory and the structure of science policy", Science and Public Policy, 23(4), August, pages 229-240.
12. Hackmann, H (2001), "National research priorities and the governance of science", in S Dresner and N Gilbert (editors), The Dynamics of European Science and Technology Policies (Ashgate, Aldershot) pages 136-162.
13. Jacob, M, and T Hellström (editors) (2001), The Future of Knowledge Production in the Academy (Open University Press, Buckingham).
14. Kyvik, S (1997), "Funding university research in the Nordic countries", Science and Public Policy, 24(4), August, pages 233-244.
15. Latour, B, and S Woolgar (1979), Laboratory Life: The Social Construction of Scientific Facts (Sage Publications, London).
16. Mathisen, W C (1996), "Research priority areas and research programmes in Norway", Science and Public Policy, 23(4), August, pages 251-260.
17. Morris, N (2000), "Science policy in action: policy and the researcher", Minerva, XXXVIII(4), pages 425-451.
18. Pelz, D C, and F M Andrews (editors) (1976), Scientists in Organizations. Productive Climates for Research and Development. Revised Edition (Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI).
19. Rip, A (2002), "A co-evolutionary perspective on ELSI, CTA and other attempts at re-contextualisation of science and technology in society", paper presented at the EASST conference in York, 31 July-3 August.
20. Rip, A, and B J R van der Meulen (1996), "The post-modern research system", Science and Public Policy, 23(6), December, pages 343-352.
21. Sandström, U, and T Harding (2002), "Forskningsrådens påtvingade gränslöshet", in U Sandström (editor), Det nya forskningslandskapet. Perspektiv på vetenskap och politik (Nya Doxa, Stockholm) pages 145-162.
22. Senker, J, et al. (1999), European Comparison of Public Research Systems (University of Sussex, Science Policy Research Unit, Brighton).
23. Shove, E (2001), "Reciprocities and reputations: new currencies in research", in Jacob and Hellström (2001), pages 63-80.
24. Skoie, H (1996), "Basic research - a new funding climate?", Science and Public Policy, 23(2), April, pages 66-75.
25. Skoie, H (2000), "Diversity and identity: the merger of five research councils in Norway", Science and Public Policy, 27(2), April, pages 83-96.
26. St meld no 39 (1998-99), Forskning ved et tidsskille (Det kongelige kirke-, utdannings- og forskningsdepartement, Oslo).
27. van der Meulen, B (1998), "Science policies as principal-agent games. Institutionalization and path dependency in the relation between government and science", Research Policy, 27(4), pages 397-414.
28. van der Meulen, B (2003), "New roles and strategies of a research council: intermediation of the principal-agent relationship", Science and Public Policy, 30(5), October, pages 323-336.