Genomics meets ethology: A new route to understanding domestication, behavior, and sustainability in animal breeding

Ambio

Volumn 34, Issue 4-5, 2005, Pages 320-324

  Jensen, Per ^a   Andersson, Leif ^b,c  

^a LINKÖPING UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^b SWEDISH UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES   (Sweden)

^c UPPSALA UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL WELFARE; SELECTIVE BREEDING;

ANIMALIA; GALLUS;

EID: 22344457460     PISSN: 00447447     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1579/0044-7447-34.4.320     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (33)

1. Rauw, W.M., Kanis, E., Noordhuizen-Stassen, E.N. and Grommers, F.J. 1998. Undesirable side-effects of selection for high production efficiency in farm animals: a review. Livestock Prod. Sci. 56, 15-33.
2. Andersson, L. 2001. Genetic dissection of phenotypic diversity in farm animals. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2, 130-138.
3. Carlborg, Ö., Kerje, S., Schütz, K., Jensen, L.J. and Andersson, L. 2003. A global search reveals epistatic interaction between QTL for early growth in the chicken, Genome Res. 13, 413-421.
4. Alcock, J. 2001. Animal Behaviour - an Evolutionary Approach. Sinauer Associates Inc., Sunderland, MA. 543 pp.
5. Sokolowski, M.B. 2001. Drosophila: genetics meets behaviour. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2, 879-890.
6. Bucan, M. and Abel, T. 2002. The mouse: genetics meets behaviour. Nature Rev./Genetics 3, 114-122.
7. Price, E.O. 1997. Behavioural genetics and the process of animal domestication. In: Genetics and the Behaviour of Domestic Animals. Grandin, T. (ed.). Academic Press, New York, pp. 31-65.
8. Clutton-Brock, J. 1999. A Natural History of Domesticated Mammals. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
9. Kruska, D. 1996. The effect of domestication of brain size and composition in the mink (Mustela vison). J. Zool. 239, 645-661.
10. Jackson, S. and Diamond, J. 1996. Metabolic and digestive responses to artificial selection in chickens. Evolution 50, 1638-1650.
11. Kuenzl, C. and Sachser, N. 1999. The behavioral endocrinology of domestication: a comparison between the domestic guinea pig (Cavia aperea f. porcellus) and its wild ancestor, the cavy (Cavia aperea). Horm. Behav. 35, 28-37.
12. Setchell, B.P. 1992. Domestication and reproduction. Animal Reprod. Sci. 28, 195-202.
13. Belyaev, D.K., Plyusnina, I.Z. and Trut, L.N. 1984. Domestication in the silver fox (Vulpes fulvus desm.) changes in physiological boundaries of the sensitive period of primary socialization. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 13, 359-370.
14. Johnsson, J.I., Petersson, E., Jonsson, E., Bjornsson, B.T. and Jarvi, T. 1996. Domestication and growth hormone alter antipredator behavior and growth patterns in juvenile brown trout, Salmo trutta. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 53, 1546-1554.
15. Hedenskog, M. 1995. Domestication increases risk proneness towards predators in sea trout (Salmo trutta L.). Information från Sötvattenslaboratoriet, Drottningholm. 1, 13-29.
16. Vasilyeva, L.L. 1995. Changes in behavioural traits of the silver fox (Vulpes vulpes) under domestication and specific genotype-environment interactions. Scientifur 19, 87-94.
17. Stricklin, W.R. 2001. The evolution and domestication of social behaviour. In: Social Behaviour in Farm Animals. Keeling, L.J. and Gonyou, H.W. (eds.). CABI, Wallingford, UK, pp. 83-110.
18. Yamashita, H., Okamoto, S., Maeda, Y. and Hashiguchi, T. 1994. Genetic relationships among domestic and jungle fowls revealed by DNA fingerprinting analysis. Jpn. Poult. Sci. 31, 335-344.
19. Siegel, P.B., Haberfeld, A., Mukherjee, T.K., Stallard, L.C., Marks, H.L., Anthony, N.B. and Dunnington, E.A. 1992. Jungle fowl-domestic fowl relationships: A use of DNA fingerprinting. Worlds Poult. Sci. J. 48, 147-155.
20. Schütz, K. 2002. Trade-off in Resource Allocation between Behaviour and Production in Fowl - Phenotypic Studies and QTL-Analyses in Red Junglefowl, White Leghorn and Their F2-Progeny. PhD Thesis, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Skara, Sweden.
21. Braastad, B.O. and Katle, J. 1989. Behavioural differences between laying hen populations selected for high and low efficiency of food utilisation. Br. Poult. Sci. 30, 533-544.
22. Schütz, K. and Jensen, P. 2001. Effects of resource allocation on behavioural strategies: a comparison of red junglefowl (Gallus gallus) and two domesticated breeds of poultry. Ethology 107, 753-765.
23. Schütz, K.E., Forkman, B. and Jensen, P. 2001. Domestication effects on foraging strategy, social behaviour and different fear responses: a comparison between the red junglefowl (Gallus gallus) and a modern layer strain. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 74, 1-14.
24. Lindqvist, E.S., Schütz, K.E. and Jensen, P. 2002. Red jungle fowl have more contrafreeloading than white leghorn layers: effect of food deprivation and consequences for information gain. Behaviour 139, 1195-1209.
25. Väisänen, J. and Jensen, P. 2003. Social coherence vs. exploration and foraging in young red junglefowl (Gallus gallus) and White Leghorn layers. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 84, 139-159.
26. Väisänen, J., Håkansson, J. and Jensen, P. 2004. Social interactions in red junglefowl (Gallus gallus) and White Leghorn layers in stable groups and after regrouping. British Poultry Sci. (In press).
27. Weller, J.I. 2001. Quantitative Trait Loci Analysis in Animals. CABI, Wallingford, UK.
28. Kerje, S., Carlborg, Ö., Jacobsson, L., Schütz, K., Hartmann, C., Jensen, P. and Andersson, L. 2003. The twofold difference in adult size between the red junglefowl and white leghorn chickens is largely explained by a limited number of QTLs. Anim. Genet. 34, 264-274.
29. Schütz, K., Kerje, S., Jacobsson, L., Forkman, B., Carlborg, Ö., Andersson, L. and Jensen, P. 2004. Major growth QTLs in fowl are related to fearful behavior: Possible genetic links between fear responses and production traits in a red junglefowl X White Leghorn intercross. Behav. Genet. 34, 121-130.
30. Kerje, S., Lind, J., Schütz, K., Jensen, P. and Andersson, L. 2003. Melanocortin 1-receptor (MClR) mutations are associated with plumage colour in chicken. Animal Genetics 34, 241-248.
31. Kerje, S., Sharma, P., Gunnarsson, U., Kim, H., Bagchi, S., Fredriksson, R., Schütz, K., Jensen, P., von Heijne, G., Okimoto, R. and Andersson, L. 2004. The dominant white, Dun and Smoky colour variants in chicken are associated with insertion/deletion polymorphisms in the PMEL17 gene. Genetics, 31, 1507-1518
32. Keeling, L.J., Andersson, L., Schutz, K.E., Kerje, S., Fredriksson, R., Carlborg, O., Cornwallis, C.K., Pizzari, T. and Jensen, P. 2004. Feather-pecking and victim pigmentation. Nature 431, 645-646.
33. Mormede, P., Moneva, E., Bruneval, C., Chaouloff, F. and Moisan, M-P. 2002. Marker-assisted selection of a neuro-behavioural trait related to behavioural inhibition in the SHR strain, an animal model of ADHD. Genes, Brain and Behavior 1, 111-116.