Development of an olfactory screening test based on the Connecticut test (CCCRC);Desarrollo de un test de screening olfatorio a partir del test de Connecticut (CCCRC)

Acta Otorrinolaringologica Espanola

Volumn 56, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 116-121

  Toledano Muñoz, Adolfo ^a,b,c,d,e   Gonzalez E ^a   Rodriguez G ^a   Galindo, A N ^d  

^a HOSPITAL UNIVERSITARIO FUNDACIÓN ALCORCÓN   (Spain)

^b Centro Médico Navarro Sánchez   (United States)

^c Centro Médico VillaSalud   (Spain)

^d HOSPITAL RUBER INTERNACIONAL   (Spain)

^e UNIVERSIDAD REY JUAN CARLOS   (Spain)

Author keywords

Anosmia; Odor discrimination; Odor identification; Odor threshold; Olfaction

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE COST; HUMAN; MALE; NOSE POLYP; OLFACTORY DISCRIMINATION; OUTPATIENT; PREDICTOR VARIABLE; SCREENING TEST; SENSIBILITY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SMELLING; ADOLESCENT; DIAGNOSTIC PROCEDURE; MASS SCREENING; MIDDLE AGED; SMELLING DISORDER;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; DIAGNOSTIC TECHNIQUES AND PROCEDURES; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MASS SCREENING; MIDDLE AGED; OLFACTION DISORDERS;

EID: 22244477107     PISSN: 00016519     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/s0001-6519(05)78585-x     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Seiden AM, Duncan HJ, Smith DV. Office management of taste and smell disorders Otolaryngol Clin North Am 1992;25:817-835.
2. Landis BN, Konnerth CG, Hummel T. A study on the frequency of olfactory dysfunction. Laryngoscope 2004;114:1764-69.
3. Larsen K, Tos M. The estimated incidence of symptomatic nasal polyps. Acta Otolaryngol 2002;122:179-82.
4. Toledano A, Gónzalez E, Herráiz C, Plaza G, Mate MA, Aparicio JM et al. Alteraciones del olfato en la consulta ORL general. Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp 2002;53:653-7.
5. Holbrook EH, Leopold DA. Anosmia: diagnosis and management. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2003,11:54-60.
6. Barz S, Hummel T, Pauli, et al. Chemosensory event-related potentials in response to trigeminal and olfactory stimulation in idiopathic Parkinson's disease. Neurology 1997;49:1424-31.
7. Doty RL, Shaman P, Dann M. Development of the University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test: To Standardized Microencapsulated Test of Olfactory Function. Physiol & Behavior 1984;32:489-502.
8. Doty RL. The Smell Identification Test Administration Manual. Haddon Heights, NJ: Sensonics, Inc., 1989.
9. Cain WS, Goodspeed RB, Gent JF, Leonard G. Evaluation of olfactory dysfunction in the connecticut chemosensory clinical research center. Laryngoscope 1988;98:83-8.
10. Toledano A. Can the CCCRC be proposed as a universal olfactory test? Personal Communication, AAOHNS New York 2004.
11. Toledano A, González E, De los Santos G, et al. Can the CCCRC be proposed as a universal olfactory test? Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg (in press).
12. Doty RL, Marcus A, Lee WW. Development of the 12-item Cross-Cultural Smell Identification Test (CCSIT). Laryngoscope 1996;106:353-6.
13. Hummel T, Konnerth CG, Rosenheim K, Kobal G. Screening of olfactory function with a four-minute odor identification test: reliability, normative data and investigations in patients with olfactory loss. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 2001;110:976-81.
14. Toledano A, Gónzalez E, Onrubia TJ, Herráiz C, Mate MA, García M et al. Test de olfato de Connecticut (CCCRC): valores en voluntarios sanos. Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp 2003;54:678-85.