Connecticut olfactory test: In healthy volunteers values;Test de olfato de Connecticut (CCCRC): Valores en voluntarios sanos

Acta Otorrinolaringologica Espanola

Volumn 54, Issue 10, 2003, Pages 678-685

  Toledano Munõz, Adolfo ^a,b,c   Gonzalez E ^a   Onrubia, T J ^a   Herraiz C ^a   Mate, Ma A ^a   Garcia M ^b   Navarro, M ^b   Plaza, G ^a   Aparicio, J M ^a   De Los Santos, G ^a   Galindo, N ^b  

^a HOSPITAL UNIVERSITARIO FUNDACIÓN ALCORCÓN   (Spain)

^b HOSPITAL RUBER INTERNACIONAL   (Spain)

^c UNIVERSIDAD REY JUAN CARLOS   (Spain)

Author keywords

Anosmia; Hyposmia; Olfaction

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ANOSMIA; ARTICLE; CHEMOSENSITIVITY; DESCRIPTIVE RESEARCH; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; HYPOSMIA; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; ODOR; OLFACTORY DISCRIMINATION; SAMPLE SIZE; SMELLING DISORDER; STUDENT T TEST; VOLUNTEER; ADOLESCENT; AGE; CHILD; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC TEST; MIDDLE AGED; REFERENCE VALUE; SEX DIFFERENCE; SPAIN; VALIDATION STUDY;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGE FACTORS; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CHILD; DIAGNOSTIC TESTS, ROUTINE; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; ODORS; OLFACTION DISORDERS; REFERENCE VALUES; SEX FACTORS; SPAIN;

EID: 3042744815     PISSN: 00016519     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/s0001-6519(03)78467-2     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Report of the Panel on Communicative Disorders to the National Advisory Neurological and Communicative Disorders and Stroke Council. Washington DC, Public Health Service, 1979, p319.
2. Toledano A, González E, Herráiz C, et al. Alteraciones del olfato en la consulta ORL general. Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp 2002;53:653-657.
3. Seiden AM, Duncan HJ, Smith DV. Atención de los trastornos del gusto y el olfato. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 1992;861-880.
4. Cain WS, Goodspeed RB, Gent JF, Leonard G. Evaluation of olfactory dysfunction in the connecticut chemosensory clinical research center. Laryngoscope 1988;98: 83-88.
5. Dawes PDJ. Clinical test of olfaction: a review. Clin Otolaryngol 1998;23:484-490.
6. Elsberg CA. The sense ol smell. WI: The value of quantitative test for the localisation of supratentorial tumours of the brain: a preliminary report. Bull Neurol Inst NY 1935;4: 511-52.
7. Amoore JE, Ollman BG. Practical test kits for quantitatively evluaating the sense of smell. Rhinology 1983;21:49-54.
8. Davidson TM, Murphy C. Rapid clinical evaluation of anosmia, the alcohol sniff test. Arch Otolaryngol HN Surg 1997;123:591-594.
9. Doty RL, Shaman P, Kimmelman CP, et al. University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test: a rapid quantitative olfactory function test for the clinic. Laryngoscope 1984;94:176-178.
10. Cain WS, Rabin MD. Comparability of two test of olfactory functioning. Chem Senses 1989;14:479.
11. Smith DV. Taste and smell dysfuction. In Paparella MM, Shumrick DA, gluckman JL, et al (ed). Otolaryngology-Head and Neck. Ed 3, vol 3. Philadelphia. WB Saunders, 1990, p 1911.
12. Stevens JC, Cains WS. Old age deficits in the sense of smell gauged by thresholds, magnitud matching, and odor identification. Psych Aging 1986;2:36-42.
13. Doty RL, Shaman P, Applebaum SL, et al. Smell Identifiction Ability: changes with age. Science 1984;226:1441-1443.
14. Venstrom D, Amoore JE. Olfactory threshold in relation to age, sex or smoking. J Food Science 1968;33:264-265.