Towards interactive composition of semantic web services

AAAI Spring Symposium - Technical Report

Volumn 6, Issue , 2004, Pages 100-107

  Kim, Jihie ^a   Gil, Yolanda ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; AUTONOMOUS AGENTS; COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; COMPUTER SOFTWARE; SEMANTICS; USER INTERFACES;

ONTOLOGY; PROCESS MODELS; SEMANTIC INTEROPERABILITY; WEB SERVICES;

WORLD WIDE WEB;

EID: 22244451705     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (30)

1. Ankolekar, A. 2002. Daml-s: Web service description for the semantic web. In Proc. 1st Int'l Semantic Web Conf. (ISWC02).
2. BizTalk. 2003. http://www.microsoft.com/biztalk/.
3. Burstein, M.; McDermott, D.; Smith, D. R.; and Westfold, S. J. 2000. Derivation of glue code for agent interoperation. In Sierra, C.; Gini, M.; and Rosenschein, J. S., eds., Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Autonomous Agents, 277-284. Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain: ACM Press.
4. Chien, S., and Mortensen, H. 1996. Image processing for scientific data analysis of a large image database. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 18(8):854-859.
5. Chin, G.; Leung, R.; Schuchardt, K.; and Gracio, D. 2002. New paradigms in problem solving environments for scientific computing. In Proceedings of the Intelligent User Interfaces.
6. Christensen, E.; Curbera, P.; Meredith, G.; and Weerawarana, S. 2003. WSDL: Web service description language. http://www.w3.org/TR/wsdl.
7. DAML-Ontology. 2003. http://www.daml.org/ontologies.
8. Fillmore, C. 1968. The case for case. In Universals in Linguistic Theory.
9. Gil, Y., and Blythe, J. 2000. How can a structured representation of capabilities help in planning? In Proceedings of the AAAI workshop on Representational Issues for Real-World Planning Systems.
10. Heineman, G., and Councill, W. 2001. Component-Based Software Engineering: Putting the Pieces Together. Addison-Wesley.
11. Jennings, N. 2001. Building complex software systems: The case for an agent-based approach.
12. KHOROS. 2003. http://www.khoral.com/.
13. Kim, J., and Gil, Y. 2000. Acquiring problem-solving knowledge from end users: Putting interdependency models to the test. In Proceedings of AAAI-2000, 223-229.
14. Kim, J., and Gil, Y. 2001. Knowledge analysis on process models. In Proceedings of IJCAI-2001, 935-942.
15. Kim, J.; Spraragen, M.; and Gil, Y. 2004. An intelligent assistant for interactive workflow composition. In Proceedings of the Intelligent User Interfaces Conference.
16. Lansky, A.; Friedman, M.; Getoor, L.; Schmidler, S.; and Short, N. 1995. The collage/khoros link: Planning for image processing tasks. In AAAI Spring Symposium on Integrated Planning Applications.
17. Mcdermott, D. 2002. Estimated-regression planning for interactions with web services. In Al planning systems Conference.
18. McIlraith, S., and Fadel, R. 2002. Planning with complex actions.
19. McIlraith, S., and Son, T. 2002. Adapting golog for composition of semantic web services.
20. Narayanan, S., and McIlraith, S. 2002. Simulation, verification and automated composition of web services.
21. Paolucci, M.; Kawmura, T.; Payne, T.; and Sycara, K. 2002. Semantic matching of web services capabilities. In First Int. Semantic Web Conf.
22. Ponnekanti, S., and A.Fox. 2002. A. sword: A developer toolkit for web service composition. In Proc. of the Eleventh International World Wide Web Conference.
23. ProcedureCharter. 2003. http://www.imagespro.com/programs/2118/.
24. Sheshagiri, M.; desJardins, M.; and Finin, T. 2003. A planner for composing services described in daml-s. In ICAPS 2003 Workshop on Planning for Web Services Program.
25. SmartDraw. 2003. http://www.smartdraw.com/.
26. Spraragen, M.; Kim, J.; and Gil, Y. 2003. A formal model for intelligently assisted interactive workflow composition. ISI internal report.
27. Srivastava, B. 2000. Web services toolkit (WSTK).
28. Stickel, M.; Waldinger, R.; Lowry, M.; Pressburger, T.; and Unerwood, I. 1993. Deductive composition from astronomical software libraries. Technical Report, SRI International and NASA Ames Research Center.
29. Sycara, K.; Lu, J.; and Klusch, M. 1999. Dynamic service match-making among agents in open information environments. In Journal ACM SIGMOD Record, Special Issue on Semantic Interoperability in Global Information Systems.
30. Thakkar, S.; Knoblock, C.; Ambite, J.; and Shahabi, C. 2000. Dynamically composing web services from on-line sources. In AAAI Workshop on Intelligent Service Integration.