Acquiring Problem-Solving Knowledge from End Users: Putting Interdependency Models to the Test

Proceedings of the 17th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence and 12th Conference on Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence, AAAI 2000

Volumn , Issue , 2000, Pages 223-229

  Kim, Jihie ^a   Gil, Yolanda ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION; KNOWLEDGE ACQUISITION; MERGERS AND ACQUISITIONS;

END-USERS; EXPERIMENTAL METHODOLOGY; INDIVIDUAL COMPONENTS; INTERDEPENDENCY MODELING; KNOWLEDGE ACQUISITION TOOLS; PROBLEM-SOLVING; RESEARCH METHODOLOGIES;

PROBLEM SOLVING;

EID: 0012998831     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (24)

1. Bareiss, R.; Porter, B.; and Murray, K. 1989. Supporting start-to-finish development of knowledge bases. Machine Learning 4:259-283.
2. Basili, V.; Selby, R. W.; and Hutchens, D. H. 1986. Experimentation in software engineering. IEEE Transactions in Software Engineering SE-12(7).
3. Cohen, P.; Schrag, R.; Jones, E.; Pease, A.; Lin, A.; Starr, B.; Gunning, D.; and Burke, M. 1998. The DARPA High Performance Knowledge Bases Project. AI Magazine 19(4).
4. Cypher, A. 1993. Watch what I do: Programming by demonstration. MIT Press.
5. Eriksson, H.; Shahar, Y.; Tu, S. W.; Puerta, A. R.; and Musen, M. 1995. Task modeling with reusable problem-solving methods. Artificial Intelligence 79:293-326.
6. Fikes, R.; Farquhar, A.; and Rice, J. 1997. Tools for assembling modular ontologies in Ontolingua. In Proceedings of the Fourteenth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 436-441.
7. Gil, Y., and Melz, E. 1996. Explicit representations of problem-solving strategies to support knowledge acquisition. In Proceedings of the Thirteenth NationalConference on Artificial Intelligence.
8. Kim, J., and Gil, Y. 1999. Deriving expectations to guide knowledge base creation. In Proceedings of the Sixteenth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 235-241.
9. Kim, J., and Gil, Y. 2000. User studies of an interdependency-based interface for acquiring problem-solving knowledge. In Proceedings of the Intelligent User Interface Conference, 165-168.
10. Marcus, S., and McDermott, J. 1989. SALT: A knowledge acquisition language for propose-and-revise systems. Artificial Intelligence 39(1):1-37.
11. Mitchell, T.; Mahadevan, S.; and Steinberg, L. 1985. LEAP: A learning apprentice for VLSI design. In Proceedings of the 1985 International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence.
12. Olson, G. M., and Moran, T. P. 1998. Special issue on experimental comparisons of usability evaluation methods. Human-Computer Interaction 13.
13. Runkel, J. T., and Birmingham, W. P. 1995. Knowledge acquisition in the small: Building knowledge-acquisition tools from pieces. Knowledge Acquisition 5(2):221-243.
14. Schreiber, A. T., and Birmingham, W. P. 1996. The Sisyphus-VT initiative. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 44(3/4).
15. Self, J. 1993. Special issue on evaluation. Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education 4(2/3).
16. Sisyphus. 2000. Sisyphus projects. http://ksi.cpsc.ucalgary.ca/KAW/Sisyphus/.
17. Swartout, W., and Gil, Y. 1995. EXPECT: Explicit representations for flexible acquisition. In Proceedings of the Ninth Knowledge-Acquisition for Knowledge-Based Systems Workshop.
18. Swartout, W. R.; Paris, C. L.; and Moore, J. D. 1991. Design for explainable expert systems. IEEE Expert 6(3).
19. Tallis, M., and Gil, Y. 1999. Designing scripts to guide users in modifying knowledge-based systems. In Proceedings of the Sixteenth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence.
20. Tallis, M.; Kim, J.; and Gil, Y. 1999. User studies of knowledge acquisition tools: Methodology and lessons learned. In Proceedings of the Twelfth Knowledge-Acquisition for Knowledge-Based Systems Workshop.
21. Terveen, L. 1991. Person-Computer Cooperation Through Collaborative Manipulation. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Texas at Austin.
22. Wielinga, B. J.; Schreiber, A. T.; and Breuker, A. 1992. KADS: a modelling approach to knowledge acquisition. Knowledge Acquisition 4(1):5-54.
23. Yost, G. R. 1993. Knowledge acquisition in Soar. IEEE Expert 8(3):26-34.
24. Zelkowitz, M., and Wallace, D. 1998. Experimental models for validating computer technology. IEEE Computer 31(5):23-31.