The comparative power of the discriminant methods used in toxicological pathology

Toxicologic Pathology

Volumn 33, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 490-494

  Holland, Tom ^a  

^a ASTRAZENECA R AND D   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Armamentarium; Methodology; Ordering; Power; Ranking; Sensitivity; Specificity

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; HISTOPATHOLOGY; MEASUREMENT; METHODOLOGY; MICROSCOPE; PATHOLOGY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; TOXICOLOGY;

ANIMALS; DISCRIMINANT ANALYSIS; MICE; PATHOLOGY; RATS; TOXICITY TESTS; TOXICOLOGY;

RODENTIA;

EID: 22244437297     PISSN: 01926233     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01926230590965382     Document Type: Article

References (7)

1. Arnold, S. F. (1990). Mathematical Statistics. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.
2. Conover, W. J. (1999). Practical Nonparametric Statistics. 3rd ed. Wiley, New York.
3. Holland, T. (2001). A survey of discriminant methods used in toxicological histopathology. Toxicol Pathol. 29, 269-273.
4. Moon, C. Z. (1997). Monte Carlo Simulations. Sage Publishers, Thousand Oaks, California.
5. Murphy, K. R. (1998). Statistical Power Analysis. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, New Jersey.
6. Siegel, S., and Castellan, N. J. (1988). Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioural Sciences. 2nd ed. McGraw-Hill, New York.
7. Sprent, P. (1993). Applied Nonparametric Statistical Methods. 2nd ed. Chapman & Hall, London.