A Survey of Discriminant Methods Used in Toxicological Histopathology

Toxicologic Pathology

Volumn 29, Issue 2, 2001, Pages 269-273

  Holland, Tom ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

Control treated contrasts; examination strategies; treatment related change

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; DATA ANALYSIS; HISTOPATHOLOGY; METHODOLOGY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCORING SYSTEM; TOXICITY TESTING;

ANIMALS; GREAT BRITAIN; PATHOLOGY; QUESTIONNAIRES; SINGLE-BLIND METHOD; TOXICOLOGY;

EID: 0035005259     PISSN: 01926233     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/019262301317052567     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. Haseman JK (1993). The value and limitation of a large source of control pathology data. In: Computerised Control Animal Pathology Databases, Ed. Maustlan JAN. Pub Centre for Medicines Research, Carshalton, London, pp 11-13.
2. Arnold DL, Farber E., Krewski D. (1988). Carcinogenicity testing. Histopathology and the Blind Method. Comment Toxicology 2(2): 67-80.
3. Dodd DC (1988). Blind slide reading or the uninformed versus the informed pathologist. Comment on Toxicol 2(2): 81-92.
4. Bucci TJ (1991). Evaluation of altered morphology. In: Handbook of Toxicological Pathology, Hascheck WM, Rousseaux CG (eds). Academic Press, New York, pp 23-35.
5. Hascheck WM, Rousseaux CG (1998). Toxicological pathology: Morphological evaluation of toxicity. In: Fundamentals of Toxicological Pathology, —(). Academic Press, New York, pp 12-13.
6. Boorman GA, Eustic SL, Elwell MR, Montgomery CA, MacKenzie WF (1990). Pathology of the Fischer Rat. Academic Press, New York.
7. Greaves P., Faccini JM (1984). RatHistopathology—Appendix. Academic Press, New York.
8. Maronpot RR (1999). Pathology of the Mouse. Cache River Press Vienna, Illinois.
9. Gopinath C., Prentice DE, Lewis DJ (1987). Atlas of Experimental Toxicological Pathology, MTP Press Ltd, Lancaster.
10. Greaves P. (1990). Histopathology of Preclinical Toxicity Studies. Elselvier, Amsterdam.
11. Glaister JR (1986). Principles of Toxicological Pathology. Taylor and Francis, London, pp 204-207.