Can cytoplasmic incompatibility inducing Wolbachia promote the evolution of mate preferences?

Journal of Evolutionary Biology

Volumn 18, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 967-977

  Champion De Crespigny, F E ^a   Butlin, R K ^b   Wedell, N ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EXETER   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Cytoplasmic incompatibility; Drosophila; Mate choice; Sexual selection; Wolbachia

Indexed keywords

BACTERIUM; EVOLUTION; INCOMPATIBILITY; MATE CHOICE; SEXUAL SELECTION;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; EVOLUTION; FEMALE; GENE FREQUENCY; HOST PARASITE INTERACTION; INSECT; MALE; MICROBIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; POPULATION DYNAMICS; POPULATION GENETICS; REPRODUCTION; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR; WOLBACHIA;

ANIMALS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; EVOLUTION; FEMALE; GENE FREQUENCY; GENETICS, POPULATION; HOST-PARASITE RELATIONS; INSECTS; MALE; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; POPULATION DYNAMICS; REPRODUCTION; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR, ANIMAL; WOLBACHIA;

WOLBACHIA; WOLBACHIA PIPIENTIS;

EID: 22144479423     PISSN: 1010061X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2005.00909.x     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Bressac, C. & Rousset, F. 1993. The reproductive incompatibility system in Drosophila simulans: dapi-staining analysis of the Wolbachia symbionts in sperm cysts. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 61: 226-230.
2. Caspari, E. & Watson, G.S. 1959. On the evolutionary importance of cytoplasmic sterility in mosquitoes. Evolution 13: 568-570.
3. Charlat, S., Hurst, G.D.D. & Mercot, H. 2003. Evolutionary consequences of Wolbachia infections. Trends Genet. 19: 217-223.
4. Clancy, D.J. & Hoffmann, A.A. 1998. Environmental effects on cytoplasmic incompatibility and bacterial load in Wolbachia-infected D. simulans. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 86: 13-24.
5. Fine, P.E.M. 1978. Dynamics of symbiote-dependent cytoplasmic incompatibility in Culicine mosquitos. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 31: 10-18.
6. Frank, S.A. 1997. Cytoplasmic incompatibility and population structure. J. Theor. Biol. 184: 327-330.
7. Guillemaud, T. & Rousset, F. 1997. Consequences of Wolbachia transmission process on the infection dynamics. J. Evol. Biol. 10: 601-612.
8. Hatcher, M.J. 2000. Persistence of selfish genetic elements: population structure and conflict. Trends Ecol. Evol. 15: 271-277.
9. Hoffmann, A.A. & Turelli, M. 1988. Unidirectional incompatibility in Drosophila simulans: inheritance, geographic variation and fitness effects. Genetics 119: 435-444.
10. Hoffmann, A.A., Turelli, M. & Harshman, L.G. 1990. Factors affecting the distribution of cytoplasmic incompatibility in Drosophila simulans. Genetics 126: 933-948.
11. Hoffmann, A.A. & Turelli, M. 1997. Cytoplasmic incompatibility in insects. In: Influential Passengers Inherited Microorganisms and Arthropod Reproduction (S. L. O'Neill, A. A. Hoffmann & J. H. Werren, eds), pp. 42-80. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
12. Hoffmann, A.A., Hercus, M. & Dagher, H. 1998. Population dynamics of the Wolbachia infection causing cytoplasmic incompatibility in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 148: 221-231.
13. Jiggins, F.M., Randerson, J.P., Hurst, G.D.D. & Majerus, M.E.N. 2002. How can sex ratio distorters reach extreme prevalences? Male-killing Wolbachia are not surpressed and have near-perfect vertical transmission efficiency in Acraea encedon. Evolution 56: 2290-2295.
14. Kirkpatrick, M. 1982. Sexual selection and the evolution of female choice. Evolution 36: 1-12.
15. Møller, A.P., Christe, P. & Lux, E. 1999. Parasitism, host immune function and sexual selection. Q. Rev. Biol. 74: 3-20.
16. Moreau, J., Bertin, A., Caubet, Y. & Rigaud, T. 2001. Sexual selection in an isopod with Wolbachia-induced sex reversal: males prefer real females. J. Evol. Biol. 14: 388-394.
17. Nigro, L. & Prout, T. 1990. Is there selection on RFLP differences in mitochondrial-DNA. Genetics 125: 551-555.
18. O'Neill, S.L. 1991. Cytoplasmic incompatibility in Drosophila populations - influence of assortative mating on symbiont distribution. J. Inv. Path. 58: 436-443.
19. Penn, D.J. & Potts, W.K. 1999. The evolution of mating preference and major histocompatibility complex genes. Am. Nat. 153: 145-164.
20. Prout, T. & Bungaard, J. 1977. The population genetics of sperm displacement. Genetics 85: 95-124.
21. Prout, T. 1994. Some evolutionary possibilities for a microbe that causes incompatibility in its host. Evolution 48: 909-911.
22. Randerson, J.P., Jiggins, F.M. & Hurst, L.D. 2000. Male killing can select for male mate choice: a novel solution to the paradox of the lek. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B 267: 867-874.
23. Reinhold, K., Engqvist, L., Misof, B. & Kurtz, J. 1999. Meiotic drive and evolution of female choice. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B 266: 1341-1345.
24. Reynolds, K.T. & Hoffmann, A.A. 2002. Male age, host effects and the weak expression or non-expression of cytoplasmic incompatibility in Drosophila strains infected by maternally transmitted Wolbachia. Genet. Res. 80: 79-87.
25. Rousset, F., Raymond, M. & Kjellberg, F. 1991. Cytoplasmic incompatibilites in the mosquito Culex pipiens: how to explain cytotype polymorphism? J. Evol. Biol. 4: 69-81.
26. Schofield, P. 2002. Spatially explicit models of Turelli-Hoffmann Wolbachia invasive wave fronts. J. Theor. Biol. 215: 121-131.
27. Servedio, M.R. 2000. Reinforcement and the genetics of non-random mating. Evolution 54: 21-29.
28. Servedio, M.R. 2001. Beyond reinforcement: The evolution of premating isolation by direct selection on preferences and postulating, prezygotic incompatibilities. Evolution 55: 1909-1920.
29. Servedio, M.R. 2004. The evolution of premating isolation: local adapatation and natural and sexual selection against hybrids. Evolution 58: 913-924.
30. Snook, R.R., Cleland, S.Y., Wolfner, M.F. & Karr, T.L. 2000. Offsetting effects of Wolbachia infection and heat shock on sperm production in Drosophila simulans: analyses of fecundity, fertility and accessory gland proteins. Genetics 155: 167-178.
31. Stevens, L. & Wicklow, D.T. 1992. Multi-species interactions affect cytoplasmic incompatibility in Tribolium flour beetles. Am. Nat. 140: 642-653.
32. Tram, U. & Sullivan, W. 2002. Role of delayed nuclear envelope breakdown and mitosis in Wolbachia-induced cytoplasmic incompatibility. Science 296: 1124-1126.
33. Turelli, M. & Hoffmann, A.A. 1991. Rapid spread of an inherited incompatibility factor in California Drosophila. Nature 353: 440-442.
34. Turelli, M., Hoffmann, A.A. & McKechnie, S.W. 1992. Dynamics of cytoplasmic incompatibility and mtDNA variation in natural Drosophila simulans populations. Genetics 132: 713-723.
35. Turelli, M. 1994. Evolution of incompatibility-inducing microbes and their hosts. Evolution 48: 1500-1513.
36. Turelli, M. & Hoffmann, A.A. 1995. Cytoplasmic incompatibility in Drosophila simulans: dynamics and parameter estimates from natural populations. Genetics 140: 1319-1338.
37. Vala, F., Egas, M., Breeuwer, J.A.J. & Sabelis, M.W. 2004. Wolbachia affects oviposition and mating behaviour of its spider mite host. J. Evol. Biol. 17: 692-700.
38. Wade, M.J. & Chang, N.W. 1995. Increased male fertility in Tribolium confusum beetles after infection with the intracellular parasite Wolbachia. Nature 373: 72-74.
39. Weeks, A.R., Reynolds, K.T. & Hoffmann, A.A. 2002. Wolbachia dynamics and host effects: what has (and has not) been demonstrated? Trends Ecol. Evol. 17: 257-262.
40. Zeh, J.A. & Zeh, D.W. 1996. The evolution of polyandry I: intragenomic conflict and genetic incompatibility. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B 263: 1711-1717.
41. Zeh, J.A. & Zeh, D.W. 1997. The evolution of polyandry II: post-copulatory defences against genetic incompatibility. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B 264: 69-75.