LAAS position domain monitor analysis and test results for CAT II/III operations

Proceedings of the 17th International Technical Meeting of the Satellite Division of the Institute of Navigation, ION GNSS 2004

Volumn , Issue , 2004, Pages 2786-2796

  Lee, Jiyun ^a  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

LATERAL PROTECTION LEVEL (LPL); LOCAL AREA AUGMENTATION SYSTEM (LAAS); POSITION DOMAIN MONITOR (PDM); VERTICAL PROTECTION LEVEL (VPL);

ACCIDENT PREVENTION; ALGORITHMS; ERROR COMPENSATION; INERTIAL NAVIGATION SYSTEMS; MONITORING; POSITION CONTROL; TRACKING (POSITION);

GLOBAL POSITIONING SYSTEM;

EID: 22144473355     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (17)

1. Minimum Operational Performance Standards for GPS/Local Area Augmentation System Airborne Equipment. RTCA DO-253A, SC-159, WG-4A. Nov. 28, 2001, Washington, D.C.
2. Specification: Performance Type One Local Area Augmentation System Ground Facility. FAA-E-2937. 21 September 1999, Washington, D.C.: U.S. Federal Aviation Administration.
3. Specification: Category I Local Area Augmentation System Non-Federal Ground Facility. FAA/AND710-2937. May 31, 2001, Washington, D.C.: U.S. Federal Aviation Administration.
4. Lee, J., et al. LAAS Sigma Monitor Analysis and Failure-Test Verification. in ION NTM 2001. June 11-13, 2001. Albuquerque, N.M.
5. Braff, R., Position Domain Monitor (PDM) Performance Analysis for CAT III. 2002, MITRE/CAASD: McLean, VA.
6. Lee, J., et al. LAAS Position Domain Monitor Analysis and Failure-Test Verification, in 21st AIAA ICSSC. April, 2003. Yokohama, Japan.
7. Luo, M. and S. Pullen, LAAS Reference Receiver Correlation Analysis. Unpublished Manuscript. Feb. 17, 1999: Stanford University.
8. Xie, G., et al. Integrity Design and Updated Test Results for the Stanford LAAS Integrity Monitor Testbed. in ION NTM. June 11-13, 2001. Albuquerque, N.M.
9. Minimum Aviation System Performance Standards for the Local Area Augmentation System (LAAS). RTCA/DO-245, SC-159, WG-4. September 1998, Washington D.C.
10. FAA LAAS Ground Facility (LGF) Functions. Unpublished Manuscript. Vol. 2.4. September 9, 1998: LAAS KTA Group.
11. Pervan, B. and I. Sayim, Sigma Inflation for the Local Area Augmentation of GPS. IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, October, 2001. Vol. 37(No. 4).
12. Pervan, B., S. Pullen, and I. Sayim. Sigma Estimation, Inflation, and Monitoring in the LAAS Ground System, in Proceedings of 'ION GPS. Sept. 19-22, 2000. Salt Lake City, UT.
13. DeCleene, B., Proof for ICAO Overbounding Requirement. December 1999, ICAO Overbounding Subgroup.
14. Gary, M., et al. Development of the LAAS Accuracy Models, in Proceedings of ION GPS. Sept. 19-22, 2000. Salt Lake City, UT.
15. Pullen, S., et al. LAAS Ground Facility Design Improvements to Meet Proposed Requirements for Category II/III Operations, in Proceedings of ION GPS. Sept, 2002. Portland, OR.
16. Pullen, S., et al. The Use of CUSUMs to Validate Protection Level Overbounds for Ground Based and Space Based Augmentations Systems, in Proceedings of ISPA 2000. 18-20 July 2000. Munich, Germany.
17. Hawkins, D.M. and D.H. Olwell, Cumulative Sum Charts and Charting for Quality Improvement. 1998, Springer-Verlag, Inc.: New York.