LAAS position domain monitor analysis and failure-test verification

21st International Communications Satellite Systems Conference and Exhibit

Volumn , Issue , 2003, Pages

  Lee, Jiyun ^a   Pullen, Sam ^a   Xie, Gang ^a  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

APPROACH AND LANDINGS; BROADCAST STANDARD; CONTINUITY REQUIREMENTS; FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION; GROUND FACILITIES; LOCAL AREA AUGMENTATION SYSTEMS; POSITION DOMAIN MONITORS; STANFORD UNIVERSITY;

AIR NAVIGATION;

COMMUNICATION SATELLITES;

EID: 84897731927     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (21)

1. R. Braff., "Position Domain Monitor (PDM) Performance Analysis for CAT III," McLean, VA.,MITRE/CAASD, October 1, 2002.
2. J. Lee, S. Pullen, et.al., "LAAS Sigma Monitor Analysis and Failure-Test Verification,", ION NTM 2001, Albuquerque, N.M., June 11-13, 2001.
3. S. Pullen, et.al., LAAS Ground Facility Design Improvements to Meet Proposed Requirements for Category II/III Operations, Proceedings of ION GPS 2002. Portland, OR., Sept, 2002.
4. M. Gray, et.al., "Development of the LAAS Accuracy Models," Proceedings of ION GPS 2000. Salt Lake City, UT., Sept. 19-22, 2000.
5. G. Xie, S. Pullen, et.al., "Integrity Design and Updated Test Results for the Stanford LAAS Integrity Monitor Testbed,", ION NTM 2001, Albuquerque, N.M., June 11-13, 2001.
6. B. Pervan, et.al., "Sigma Estimation, Inflation, and Monitoring in the LAAS Ground System," Proceedings of ION GPS 2000. Salt Lake City, UT., Sept. 19-22, 2000.
7. RTCA (SC-159/WG-4), Minimum Aviation System Performance Standards for the Local Area Augmentation System (LAAS). Washington D.C., RTCA/DO-245, 28 September 1998
8. Minimum Operational Performance Standards for GPS/Local Area Augmentation System Airborne Equipment. Washington, D.C., RTCA DO-253A, SC-159, WG-4A, Nov. 28, 2001.
9. S. Pullen, et.al., The Use of CUSUMs to Validate Protection Level Overbounds for Ground Based and Space Based Augmentations Systems, Proceedings of ISPA 2000. Munich, Germany, 18-20 July 2000.
10. M. Luo, S. Pullen, et.al., "Development and Testing of the Stanford LAAS Ground Facility Prototype, Proceedings of ION NTM 2000. Anaheim, CA., 26-28 January 2000, pp.210-219.
11. gn Overbound, IEEE PLANS 2000, San Diego, CA, 13-16 March 2000.
12. R. Braff, "Description of the FAA's Local Area Augmentation System (LAAS)," Navigation. Vol. 44, No. 4, Winter 1997-1998, pp. 411-424.
13. B. DeCleene, Proof for ICAO Overbounding Requirement, Paper distributed to ICAO Overbounding Subgroup, 2 December 1999.
14. Specification: Performance Type One Local Area Augmentation System Ground Facility. U.S. Federal Aviation Administration, Washington, D.C., FAA-E-2937, 21 September 1999.
15. FAA LAAS Ground Facility (LGF) Functions, Version 2.4. LAAS KTA Group, Unpublished Manuscript, September 9, 1998.
16. S. Pullen, M. Luo, et.al., "GBAS Validation Methodology and Test Results from the Stanford LAAS Integrity Monitor Testbed,", ION GPS 2000, 19-22 September 2000, Salt Lake City, UT, pp. 1191-1201.
17. R. Braff, C. Shively, An Overbound Concept for Pseudorange Error from the LAAS Ground Facility," Proceedings of IAIN World Congress/ION 56th Annual Meeting. San Diego, CA., June 26-28, 2000.
18. B. Pervan, S. Pullen, M. Luo, "Navigation Integrity Monitoring for DGPS-Based Precision Landing of Aircraft," Proceedings of the 1999 American Control Conference. San Diego, CA., June 2-4, 1999.
19. P. Enge, "Local Area Augmentation of GPS for the Precision Approach of Aircraft,", Proceedings of the IEEE, Vol. 87, No. 1, January 1999
20. Specification: Category I Local Area Augmentation System Non-Federal Ground Facility. U.S. Federal Aviation Administration, Washington, D.C., FAA/AND710-2937, May 31, 2001.
21. M. Luo, S. Pullen, "LAAS Reference Receiver Correlation Analysis," Stanford University, Unpublished Manuscript, Feb. 17, 1999.