Hearing loss and hearing aids

Neurologic Clinics

Volumn 23, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 901-918

  Palmer, Catherine V ^a,b   Ortmann, Amanda ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH   (United States)

^b University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHM; CLINICAL EXAMINATION; CLINICAL PROTOCOL; COCHLEAR NERVE; DEMOGRAPHY; DISEASE SEVERITY; ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY; EXTERNAL AUDITORY CANAL; FOLLOW UP; HEARING AID; HEARING LOSS; HUMAN; INNER EAR; MEDICAL ASSESSMENT; MEDICAL CARE; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; MEDICAL PROFESSION; MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY; MICROPHONE; MIDDLE EAR; NERVE INJURY; OTOACOUSTIC EMISSION; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PATIENT SELECTION; PERCEPTION DEAFNESS; PHYSICIAN; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSYCHOMETRY; QUESTIONNAIRE; RADIOGRAPHY; REVIEW; SELF EVALUATION; SURGEON; VALIDATION PROCESS; VESTIBULAR DISORDER;

ADULT; AUDIOMETRY; CHILD; HEARING AIDS; HEARING LOSS; HUMANS;

EID: 22144467292     PISSN: 07338619     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ncl.2005.03.002     Document Type: Review

References (45)

1. S. Erdman, and M. Demorest Adjustment to hearing impairment I: description of a heterogeneous clinical population J Speech Language Hear Res 41 1987 107 122
2. T.O. Hester, and H. Silverstein Patient interview: history of symptoms and definitions of common vestibular disorders Semin Hear 23 2002 107 112
3. Hearing, ear infections, and deafness. Available at: www.nidcd.nih.gov/ health/statistics/hearing.asp. Accessed January 7, 2005.
4. American Academy of Audiology Pediatric amplification guidelines Audiology Today 16 2 2004 1 8
5. J.R. Jameson The impact of hearing impairment J. Katz Handbook of clinical audiology 4th edition 1994 Williams and Wilkins Baltimore 596 615
6. J. Northern, and D. Hayes Universal screening for infant hearing impairment: necessary, beneficial, and justifiable Audiology Today 6 2 1994 10 13
7. National Center for Health Statistics chartbook on trends in the health of Americans. Department of Health and Human Services, Center for Disease Control. Hyattsville, MD; 2002.
8. B.K. Keller, J.L. Morton, and V.S. Thomas The effect of visual and hearing impairments on functional status J Am Geriatr Soc 47 1999 1319 1325
9. A. Thomas, and K. Herbst Social and psychological implications of acquired deafness for adults of employment age Br J Audiol 14 1980 76
10. American Speech Language Hearing Association Executive Council. Minimum requirements of hearing programs offering guidelines in selection of hearing aids ASHA Monograph 1952
11. American Speech Language Hearing Association Executive Council. Minimum requirements of hearing programs offering guidelines in selection of hearing aids ASHA Monograph (revised) 1964
12. Castle W. American Speech Language Hearing Association: a conference on hearing aid evaluation procedures. ASHA Reports. No. 2. 1967.
13. Joint Audiology Committee. Audiology clinical practice algorithms and statements. Audiology Today 2000; August [Special Issue].
14. M. Valente, and D. Van Vliet The Independent Hearing Aid Fitting Forum (IHAFF) Protocol Trends Amplification 2 1 1997 6 35
15. M. Valente, R. Bentler, and R. Seewald Guidelines for the selection and fitting of amplification Am J Audiol 6 1998 14 27
16. D. Zapala, and R. Brey Clinical experience with the vestibular evoked myogenic potential J Am Acad Audiol 15 2004 198 215
17. Vanderbilt/VA report 1990 Bill Wilkerson Press Nashville (TN)
18. H. Davis Hearing and deafness: a guide for laymen 1947 J.J. Little and Ives New York
19. M. Killion Hearing aids: past, present, future: moving toward normal conversations in noise Br J Audiol 21 1997 141 148
20. R. Plomp Auditory handicap of hearing impairment and the limited benefit of hearing aids J Acoust Soc Am 63 1978 533 549
21. M. Nilsson, S. Soli, and J. Sullivan Development of the Hearing in Noise Test for the measurement of speech reception thresholds in quiet and in noise J Acoust Soc Am 95 1994 1085 1099
22. Etymotic Research. The SIN Test (compact disk). Elk Grove Village (IL); 1993.
23. I. Ventry, and B. Weinstein The Hearing Handicap Inventory for the Elderly: a new tool Ear Hear 3 1982 128 134
24. C. Newman, B. Weinstein, and G. Jacobson Test-retest reliability of the Hearing Handicap Inventory for Adults Ear Hear 12 1991 355 357
25. R. Cox, and G. Alexander The abbreviated profile of hearing aid benefit Ear Hear 16 1995 176 186
26. C. Palmer, and E. Mormer Goals and expectations of the hearing aid fitting Trends Amplification 4 2 1999 61 71
27. J. Dillon, A. James, and J. Ginis Client oriented scale of improvement (COSI) and its relationship to several other measures of benefit and satisfaction provided by hearing aids J Am Acad Audiol 8 1997 27 43
28. S. Kochkin MarkeTrak V: why my hearing aid end up in the drawer: the consumer's perspective Hear J 53 2 2000 34 36, 39-42
29. M. Valente Binaural amplification: part II Audecibel 9 1984 10 14
30. D. Hawkins, and W. Yacullo Signal to noise ratio advantage of binaural hearing aids and directional microphones under different levels of reverberation Speech Hear Disord 49 1984 278 286
31. T. Ricketts Directivity quantification in hearing aids: fitting and measurement effects Ear Hear 21 2000 45 58
32. T. Ricketts, and P. Henry Evaluation of an adaptive, directional- microphone hearing aid Int J Audiol 41 2002 100 112
33. T. Ricketts, and B. Hornsby Distance and reverberation effects on directional benefit Ear Hear 24 2003 472 484
34. T. Ricketts, P. Henry, and D. Gnewikow Full time directional versus user selectable microphone modes in hearing aids Ear Hear 24 2003 424 439
35. M. Cord, R. Surr, and B. Walden Performance of directional microphone hearing aids in everyday life J Am Acad Audiol 13 2003 295 307
36. R. Surr, B. Walden, and M. Cord Influence of environmental factors on hearing aid microphone preference J Am Acad Audiol 13 2002 208 222
37. J. Alcantara, B. Moore, and V. Kuhnel Evaluation of the noise reduction system in a commercial digital hearing aid Int J Audiol 42 2003 34 42
38. R. Bentler, C. Anderson, and D. Niebuhr A longitudinal study of noise reduction circuits. Part II: subjective measures J Speech Hear Language Res 36 1993 820 831
39. H. Dillon NAL-NL1: a new prescriptive fitting procedure for nonlinear hearing aids Hear J 52 1999 10 16
40. L. Cornelisse, R. Seewald, and D. Jamieson Fitting wide-dynamic range compression hearing aids: The DSL [i/o] approach Hear J 47 10 1994 23 29
41. S. Kochkin Factors impacting consumer choice of dispenser and hearing aid brand; use of ALDs and computers Hear Aid Rev 9 12 2002 12 23
42. H. Abrams, T. Chisolm, and R. McArdle Cost effectiveness of aural rehabilitation J Rehabil Res Dev 39 2002 549 558
43. R. Cox, and G. Alexander Measuring satisfaction with amplification in daily life: SADL Scale Ear Hear 20 2003 306 320
44. R. Cox, and G. Alexander The International Outcome Inventory for Hearing Aids (IOI-HA): psychometric properties of the English Version Int J Audiol 41 2002 30 35
45. S. Kochkin, and V.I. MarkeTrak Ten year customer satisfaction trends in the US hearing instrument market Hear Rev 9 10 2002 14 25 46