Towards a Discursive Parapsychology: Language and the Laboratory Study of Anomalous Communication

Theory & Psychology

Volumn 15, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 325-355

  Wooffitt, Robin ^a   Allistone, Simon ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF YORK   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

anomalous experience; consciousness; conversation analysis; discursive psychology; parapsychology

Indexed keywords

EID: 22144462770     PISSN: 09593543     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0959354305053218     Document Type: Article

References (125)

1. Alcock, J.E.(1981). Parapsychology: Science or magic? Oxford/New York: Pergamon.
2. Alcock, J.E.(1987).Parapsychology: Science of the anomalous or search for the soul? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 10,553-565.
3. Antaki, C.,Condor, S., &Levine, M.(1996).Social identities in talk: Speakers’ own orientations. British Journal of Social Psychology, 35,473-492.
4. Antaki C., &Widdicombe S.(Eds.). (1998). Identities in talk.London: Sage.
5. Atkinson, J.M.(1984). Our master’s voices: The language and body language of politics.London: Methuen.
6. Atkinson, J.M., &Heritage, J.(Eds.). (1984). Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
7. Auburn, T., &Lea, S.(2003).Doing cognitive distortions: Discursive psychology analysis of sex offender treatment talk. British Journal of Social Psychology, 42,281-298.
8. Auburn, T.,Lea, S., &Drake, S.(1999). ‘It’s your opportunity to be truthful’: Disbelief, mundane reasoning and the investigation of crime. In C. Willig(Ed.), Applied discourse analysis: Social and psychological interventions (pp. 44-65).Buckingham: Open University Press.
9. Bem, D., &Honorton, C.(1994).Does psi exist? Replicable evidence for an anomalous process of information transfer. Psychological Bulletin, 115,4-18.
10. Bem, D.J.,Palmer, J., &Broughton, R.S.(2001).Updating the Ganzfeld Database: A victim of its own success? Journal of Parapsychology, 65,207-218.
11. Bennett, G.(1987). Traditions of belief: Women, folklore and the supernatural today.Harmondsworth: Penguin.
12. Bierman, D.J.(1995).The Amsterdam Ganzfeld Series III and IV: Target clip emotionality, effect sizes and openness. In N.L. Zingrone(Ed.), Proceedings of presented papers, 38th Annual Parapsychological Association Convention (pp.27-370. Fairhaven, MA: Parapsychological Association.
13. Billig, M.(1987). Arguing and thinking: A rhetorical approach to social psychology.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
14. Blain, J.(2002). Nine worlds of seid-magic: Ecstasy and neo-shamanism in North European paganism.London/New York: Routledge.
15. Brannigan, A.(1981). The social basis of scientific discoveries.New York: Cambridge University Press.
16. Braud, W., &Anderson, R.(Eds.). (1998). Transpersonal research methods for the social sciences: Honoring human experience.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
17. Broughton, R.S.(1991). Parapsychology: The controversial science.London/Sydney: Rider.
18. Broughton, R.S., &Alexander, C.(1995).Autoganzfeld II: The first 100 sessions. In N.L. Zingrone(Ed.), Proceedings of presented papers, 38th Annual Parapsychological Association Convention (pp.53-61 ). Fairhaven, MA: Parapsychological Association.
19. Campbell, C., &McIver, S.(1987).Cultural sources of support for contemporary occultism. Social Compass, 34,41-60.
20. Cardena, E.(2004, 31 March-4 April).Introspection is alive and well: Current methodologies to study conscious experience. Plenary presentation at the 5th Symposium of the Bial Foundation: ‘Behindand Beyond the Brain’, Porto.
21. Cardena, E.,Lynn, S.J., &Krippner, S.(Eds.). (2000). Varieties of anomalous experience: Examiningthe scientific evidence.Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
22. Chalmers, D.J.(in press). How can we construct a science of consciousness? In M. Gazzaniga(Ed.), The cognitive neurosciences III.Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
23. Clark, S.(Ed.). (2001). Languages of witchcraft: Narrative, ideology and meaning in early modern culture.Basingstoke: Macmillan.
24. Collins, H.M.(1992). Changing order: Replication and induction in scientific practice.Chicago/London: University of Chicago Press. (Original work published 1985.)
25. Collins, H.M., &Pinch, T.J.(1982). Frames of meaning: The social construction of extraordinary science London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
26. Coulter, J.(1979). The social construction of mind: Studies in ethnomethodology and linguistic philosophy.London: Macmillan.
27. Coulter, J.(1989). Mind in action.Cambridge: Polity.
28. Dalton, K.S.,Morris, R.L.,Delanoy, D.L.,Radin, D.I.,Taylor, R., &Wiseman, R.(1996).Security measures in an automated ganzfeld system. Journal of Parapsychology, 60,129-147.
29. da Silva, F.E.,Pilato, S., &Hiraoka, R.(2003).Ganzfeld vs no ganzfeld: An exploratory study of the effects of ganzfeld conditions on ESP. Proceedings of presented papers, 46th Annual Convention of the Parapsychological Association (pp.31-48 ). New York: Parapsychological Association.
30. Edge, H.L.,Morris, R.L.,Palmer, J., &Rush, J.H.(1986). Foundations of parapsychology: Exploring the boundaries of human capability.Boston, MA: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
31. Edwards, D.(1991).Categories are for talking: On the cognitive and discursive bases of categorization. Theory & Psychology, 1,515-542.
32. Edwards, D.(1994).Script formulations: A study of event descriptions in conversation. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 13,211-247.
33. Edwards, D.(1995 a).Two to tango: Script formulations, dispositions and rhetorical symmetry in relationship troubles talk. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 28,319-350.
34. Edwards, D.(1995 b).Sacks and psychology: An essay review of Harvey Sacks, Lectures on conversation Theory & Psychology, 5,579-596.
35. Edwards, D.(1997). Discourse and cognition.London. Sage.
36. Edwards, D.(1999).Emotion discourse. Culture & Psychology, 5,271-291.
37. Edwards, D., &Potter, J.(1992).The Chancellor’s memory: Rhetoric and truth in discursive remembering. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 6,187-215.
38. Forer, B.R.(1949).The fallacy of personal validation: A classroom demonstrationof gullibility. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 44,118-123.
39. Hammerseley. M.(2003).Conversation analysis and discourse analysis: Methods or paradigms? Discourse & Society, 14,751-781.
40. Hanlon, J.(1974, 17 October).Uri Geller and science. New Scientist, pp.170-185.
41. Harré, R.(1989). Language games and texts of identity. In J. Shotter&K.J. Gergen(Eds.), Texts of identity (pp. 20-35).London: Sage.
42. Harré, R.(1995). Agentive discourse. In R. Harré& P. Stearns(Eds.), Discursive psychology in practice (pp. 120-136).London/Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
43. Hayes, N.(2000). Foundations of psychology (3rd ed.).London: Thomson Learning.
44. Heritage, J.(1978).Aspects of the flexibilities of language use. Sociology, 12,79-104.
45. Heritage, J.(1984 a). Garfinkel and ethnomethodology.Cambridge: Polity.
46. Heritage, J.(1984 b). A change of state token and aspects of its sequential placement. In J.M. Atkinson& J. Heritage(Eds.), Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis (pp. 299-345).Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
47. Hess, D.J.(1994). Science in the New Age: The paranormal, its defenders and debunkers, and American culture.Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
48. Honorton, C.(1985).Meta-analysis of psi ganzfeld research: A response to Hyman. Journal of Parapsychology, 49,51-91.
49. Honorton, C.,Ramsey, M., &Cabibbo, C.(1975).Experimenter effects in extra-sensory perception. Journal of the American Society for Psychical Research, 69,135-139.
50. Hufford, D.(1982). The terror that comes in the night: An experience-centered study of supernatural assault traditions.Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
51. Hufford, D.(1995). Beings without bodies: An experience-centered theory of the belief in spirits. In B. Walker(Ed.), Out of the ordinary: Folklore and the supernatural (pp. 11-45).Logan: University of Utah Press.
52. Hutchby, I., &Wooffitt, R.(1998). Conversation analysis: Principles, practices and applications.Cambridge: Polity.
53. Hyman, R.(1977).‘Cold reading’: How to convince strangers that you know all about them. Skeptical Enquirer, 2,18-37.
54. Hyman, R.(1985).The ganzfeld psi experiment: A critical appraisal. Journal of Parapsychology, 49,3-49.
55. Hyman, R.(1991).Comment. Statistical Science, 6,389-392.
56. Hyman, R.(1995).Evaluation of the program on anomalous mental phenomena. Journal of Parapsychology, 59,321-352.
57. Hyman, R., &Honorton, C.(1986).A joint communique: The psi ganzfeld controversy. Journal of Parapsychology, 50,351-364.
58. Irwin, H.J.(1999). An introduction to parapsychology (3rd ed.).Jefferson, NC/London: McFarland.
59. Jack, A., & Roepstorff, A. (Eds.). (2003).Special issues of The Journal of Consciousness Studies, 10(9-10).
60. Jefferson, G.(1990). List construction as a task and resource. In G. Psathas(Ed.), Interaction competence (pp. 63-92).Washington, DC: University Press of America.
61. Jefferson, G.,Sacks, H., &Schegloff, E.A.(1987). Notes on laughter in pursuit of intimacy. In G. Button&J.R.E. Lee(Eds.), Talk and social organization (pp. 152-205).Clevedon/Philadelphia, PA: Multilingual Matters.
62. Jones, W.H., &Russel, D.(1980).The selective processing of belief-disconfirming information. European Journal of Social Psychology, 10,309-312.
63. Kuhn, T.S.(1970). The structure of scientific revolutions (2nd ed.).Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
64. Kurtz, P.(Ed.). (1985). A skeptic’s handbook of parapsychology.New York: Prometheus.
65. Lorimer, D.(Ed.). (2001). Thinking beyond the brain: A wider science of consciousness.Glasgow: Floris.
66. Lynch, M., &Bogen, D.(1996). The spectacle of history: Speech, text and memory at the Iran-Contra Hearings.Durham, NC/London: Duke University Press.
67. May, E.C.(1996).The American Institutes for Research review of the Department of Defense’s Star Gate program: A commentary. Journal of Parapsychology, 60,3-23.
68. McClenon, J.(1982).A survey of elite scientists: Their attitudes towards ESP and parapsychology. Journal of Parapsychology, 46,127-152.
69. McClenon, J.(1990).Chinese and American anomalous experiences: The role of religiosity. Sociological Analysis, 51,53-67.
70. McClenon, J.(1994). Wondrous events: Foundations of religious belief.Philadelphia: University of Philadelphia Press.
71. Middleton, D., &Edwards, D.(1990). Introduction. In D. Middleton& D. Edwards(Eds.), Collective remembering (pp. 1-22).London, Sage.
72. Milton, J.(1999).Should ganzfeld research continue to be crucial in the search for a replicable psi effect? Part I: Discussion paper and an introduction to an electronic mail discussion. Journal of Parapsychology, 63,309-333.
73. Milton, J., &Wiseman, R.(1997).Ganzfeld at the crossroads: A meta-analysis of the new generation of studies. In Proceedings of the 46th Annual Convention of the Parapsychological Association (p.267 ). Hatfield: University of Hertfordshire Press.
74. Morris, R.L.(2001).The continuing evolution of parapsychology. Journal of Parapsychology, 65,327-333.
75. Morris, R.L.,Dalton, K.,Delanoy, D., &Watt, C.(1995).Comparison of the sender / no sender condition in the ganzfeld. In N.L. Zingrone(Ed.), Proceedings of presented papers, 38th Annual Parapsychological Association Convention (pp.244-259 ). Fairhaven, MA: Parapsychological Association.
76. Nikander, P.(2002). Age in action: Membership work and stages of life categories in talk.Helsinki: Academia Scientiarum Fennica.
77. Parker, A.(2000).A review of the ganzfeld work at Gothenburg University. Journal of the Society for Psychical Research, 64,1-15.
78. Parker, A.(2001, 18-26 April).Parapsychology: The good, the bad and the ugly. Paranormal Review, 18,18-26.
79. Parker, A.,Grams, D., &Pettersson, C.(1998).Further variables relating to psi in the ganzfeld. Journal of Parapsychology, 62,319-337.
80. Parker, I.(1997). Discursive psychology. In D. Fox& I. Prilleltensky(Eds.), Critical psychology: An introduction (pp. 284-298).London: Sage.
81. Parnia, S.,Waller, D.G.,Yeates, R., &Fenwick, P.(2001).A qualitative and quantitative study of the incidence, features and aetiology of near death experiences. Resuscitation, 48,149-156.
82. Potter, J.(1996). Representing reality: Discourse, rhetoric and social construction.London: Sage.
83. Potter, J.(2000).Post-cognitive psychology.Theory & Psychology, 10,31-37.
84. Potter, J.(2003).Discursive psychology: Between method and debate. Discourse & Society, 14,783-794.
85. Potter, J., &Edwards, D.(1990).Nigel Lawson’s tent: Discourse analysis, attribution theory and the social psychology of fact. European Journal of Psychology, 20,405-424.
86. Potter, J., &Edwards, D.(2003).Rethinking cognition: On Coulter on discourse and mind. Human Studies, 26,165-181.
87. Radin, D.(1997). The conscious universe: The scientific truth of psychic phenomena.New York: HarperEdge.
88. Randi, J.(1988). Flim-flam: The truth about unicorns, parapsychology and other delusions.New York: Prometheus.
89. Roe, C.A.(1995).Pseudopsychics and the Barnum effect. European Journal of Parapsychology, 11,76-91.
90. Sacks, H.(1972). On the analyzability of stories by children. In J.J. Gumperz& D. Hymes(Eds.), Directions in sociolinguistics: The ethnography of communication (pp. 325-345).Oxford: Blackwell.
91. Sacks, H.(1992). Lectures on conversation (Vols. 1 & II,G. Jefferson&E.A. Schegloff, Eds.). Oxford/Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
92. Sacks, H.,Schegloff, E.A., &Jefferson, G.(1974).A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50,696-735.
93. Schlitz. M.J., &Honorton, C.(1992).Ganzfeld psi performance within an artistically gifted population. Journal of the American Society for Psychical Research, 86,83-98.
94. Schmiedler, G.R., &Edge, H.(1999).Should ganzfeld research continue to be crucial in the search for a replicable psi effect? Part II: edited ganzfeld debate. Journal of Parapsychology, 63,335-388.
95. Singer, B., &Benassi, V.A.(1981).Occult beliefs. American Scientist, 69,49-55.
96. Smith, D.E.(1978).‘K is mentally ill’: The anatomy of a factual account. Sociology, 12,23-53.
97. Storm, L.(2000).Research note: Replicable evidence of psi: A revision of Milton’s 1999 meta-analysis of the ganzfeld databases. Journal of Parapsychology, 64,411-416.
98. Storm, L., &Ertel, S.(2002).The ganzfeld debate continued: A response to Milton and Wiseman 2001. Journal of Parapsychology, 66,673-682.
99. Strober, M., &Meynell, H.(Eds.). (1996). Critical reflections on the paranormal.New York: State University of New York Press.
100. Tart, C.T.(Ed.). (1997). Body, mind, spirit: Exploring the parapsychology of spirituality.Charlottesville, VA.: Hampton Roads.
101. Utts, J.M.(1986).The ganzfeld debate: A statistician’s perspective. Journal of Parapsychology, 50,393-402.
102. Utts, J.M.(1995).An assessment of the evidence for psychic functioning. Journal of Parapsychology, 59,289-320.
103. van Lommel, P.,van Wees, R.,Meyers, V., &Elfferich, I.(2001).Near-death experience in survivors of cardiac arrest: A prospective study in the Netherlands. The Lancet, 358,2039-2045.
104. Waismann, F.(1965). The principles of linguistic philosophy ( R. Harré, Ed.).London: Macmillan.
105. Walker, B.(Ed.). (1995). Out of the ordinary: Folklore and the supernatural.Logan: University of Utah Press.
106. Watt, C.(2002).Experimenter effects with a remote facilitation of attention focusing task: A study with multiple believer and disbeliever experimenters. Proceedings of presented papers, 45th Annual Parapsychological Association Convention (pp.306-318 ). Fairhaven, MA: Parapsychological Association.
107. Westrum, R.(1977).Social intelligence about anomalies: The case of UFOs. Social Studies of Science, 7,271-302.
108. Westrum, R.(1979). Knowledge about sea-serpents. In R. Wallis(Ed.), On the margins of science (Sociological Review Monograph No. 27, pp. 293-314).Keele: University of Keele.
109. White, R.A.(1990).An experience-centred approach to parapsychology. Exceptional Human Experiences, 8,7-36.
110. Widdicombe, S.(1993). Autobiography and change: Rhetoric and authenticity of ‘gothic’ style. In E. Burman& I. Parker(Eds.), Discourse analytic research: Repertoires and readings of texts in action (pp. 94-113).London: Routledge.
111. Widdicombe, S., &Wooffitt, R.(1990).‘Being’ versus ‘doing’ punk: On achieving authenticity as a member. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 9,257-277.
112. Widdicombe, S., &Wooffitt, R.(1995). The language of youth subcultures: Social identity in action.Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
113. Wiggins, S.(2001).Construction and action in food evaluation: Conversational data. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 20,445-463.
114. Wiggins, S.,Potter, J., &Wildsmith, A.(2001).Eating your words: Discursive psychology and the reconstruction of eating practices. Journal of Health Psychology, 6,5-15.
115. Williams, C.(1996).Metaphor, parapsychology and psi: An examination of metaphors related to paranormal experience and parapsychological research. Journal of the American Society for Psychical Research, 90,174-201.
116. Wiseman, R., &Schlitz, M.(1997).Experimenter effects and the remote detection of staring. Journal of Parapsychology, 61,197-207.
117. Wittgenstein, L.(1953). Philosophical investigations ( G. Anscombe, Ed.).Oxford: Blackwell.
118. Wooffitt, R.(1992). Telling tales of the unexpected: The organization of factual discourse.Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
119. Wooffitt, R.(2000).Some properties of the interactional organization of displays of paranormal cognition in psychic-sitter interaction’, Sociology, 43,457-479.
120. Wooffitt, R.(2001 a).Raising the dead: Reported speech in medium-sitter interaction. Discourse Studies, 3,351-374.
121. Wooffitt, R.(2001 b).A socially organized basis for displays of cognition: Procedural orientation to evidential turns in psychic-sitter interaction. British Journal of Social Psychology, 40,545-563.
122. Wooffitt, R.(2005). Language and the study of parapsychological phenomena. In M.A. Thalbourne& L. Storm(Eds.), Parapsychology in the 21st century: Essays on the future of psychical research (pp. 305-336).Jefferson, NC/London: McFarland.
123. Young, D.E., &Goulet, J.-G.(Eds.). (1994). Being changed by cross-cultural encounters: The anthropology of extraordinary experience.Peterborough, Ont.: Broadview Press.
124. Zingrone, N.L.(2002).Controversy and the problems of parapsychology. Journal of Parapsychology, 66,3-30.
125. Zusne, L., &Jones, W.H.(1989). Anomalistic psychology: A study of extraordinary phenomena and experiences.Hillside, NJ: Erlbaum.