Should ganzfeld research continue to be crucial in the search for a replicable psi effect? Part I. Discussion paper and introductionto an electronic-mail discussion

Journal of Parapsychology

Volumn 63, Issue 4, 1999, Pages 309-333

  Milton, Julie ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0000523747     PISSN: 00223387     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. th ed.). Orlando, FL: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
2. BEM, D. J., & HONORTON, C. (1994). Does psi exist? Replicable evidence for an anomalous process of information transfer. Psychological Bulletin, 115, 4-18.
3. BROUGHTON, R. (1992). Parapsychology: The controversial science. London: Rider.
4. CARPENTER, J. C. (1977). Intrasubject and subject-agent effects in ESP experiments. In B. B. Wolman (Ed.), Handbook of parapsychology (pp. 202-272). New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
5. th Annual Convention, 119-134.
6. DALTON, K. (1997b). Is there a formula to success in the ganzfeld? Observations on predictors of psi-ganzfeld performance. European Journal of Parapsychology, 13, 71-82.
7. nd ed.). Walton-on-Thames, England: Nelson.
8. HONORTON, C. (1985). Meta-analysis of psi ganzfeld research: A response to Hyman. Journal of Parapsychology, 49, 51-91.
9. HONORTON, C., BERGER, R. E., VARVOGLIS, M. P., QUANT, M., DERR, P., SCHECHTER, E. I., & FERRARI, D. C. (1990). Psi communication in the ganzfeld: Experiments with an automated testing system and a comparison with a meta-analysis of earlier studies. Journal of Parapsychology, 54, 99-139.
10. HONORTON, C., & FERRARI, D. C. (1989). Meta-analysis of forced-choice precognition experiments. Journal of Parapsychology, 53, 281-308.
11. HONORTON, C., FERRARI, D.C. & BEM, D. J. (1998). Extraversion and ESP performance: A meta-analysis and a new confirmation. Journal of Parapsychology, 62, 255-276.
12. HYMAN, R. (1985). The ganzfeld psi experiment: A critical appraisal. Journal of Parapsychology, 49, 3-49.
13. HYMAN, R., & HONORTON, C. (1986). A joint communiqué: The psi ganzfeld controversy. Journal of Parapsychology, 50, 350-364.
14. KRIPPNER, S., BRAUD, W., CHILD, I. L., PALMER, J., RAO, K. R., SCHLITZ, M., WHITE, R. A., & UTTS, J. (1993). Demonstration research and meta-analysis in parapsychology. Journal of Parapsychology, 57, 275-286.
15. th Annual Convention, 75-86.
16. MILTON, J. (1997). Meta-analysis of free-response studies without altered states of consciousness. Journal of Parapsychology, 61, 279-319.
17. th Annual Convention, 267-282.
18. MILTON, J., & WISEMAN, R. (1997b). Guidelines for extrasensory perception research. Hatfield, England: University of Hertfordshire Press.
19. MILTON, J., & WISEMAN, R. (1999a). Does psi exist? Lack of replication of an anomalous process of information transfer. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 387-391.
20. MILTON, J., & WISEMAN, R. (1999b). A meta-analysis of mass-media tests of extrasensory perception. British Journal of Psychology, 90, 235-240.
21. th Annual Convention, 177-191.
22. PALMER, J. (1978). Extrasensory perception: Research findings. In S. Krippner (Ed.), Advances in parapsychological research 2: Extrasensory perception, (pp. 59-243). New York: Plenum Press.
23. PARKER, A., & WESTERLUND, J. (1998). Current research in giving the ganzfeld an old and a new twist. Proceedings of Presented Papers: The Parapsychological Association 41 Annual Convention, 135-142.
24. PRATT, J. G. (1966). New ESP tests with Mrs. Gloria Stewart. Journal of the American Society for Psychical Research, 60, 321-339.