Low-field versus high-field MRI in diagnosing breast disorders

European Radiology

Volumn 15, Issue 7, 2005, Pages 1361-1368

  Pääkkö, Eija ^a   Reinikainen, Heli ^a   Lindholm, Eija Leena ^a   Rissanen, Tarja ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OULU   (Finland)

Author keywords

Breast; Low field; Magnetic resonance imaging

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BREAST DISEASE; BREAST FIBROSIS; BREAST TUMOR; CLINICAL ARTICLE; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE QUALITY; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MALIGNANT NEOPLASTIC DISEASE; METHODOLOGY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; OBSERVER VARIATION; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCINTIMAMMOGRAPHY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; TUMOR VOLUME;

ADULT; AGED; BIOPSY, FINE-NEEDLE; BREAST NEOPLASMS; CARCINOMA IN SITU; CARCINOMA, DUCTAL, BREAST; CARCINOMA, LOBULAR; CONTRAST MEDIA; FALSE POSITIVE REACTIONS; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; FEMALE; FIBROADENOMA; FIBROCYSTIC BREAST DISEASE; HUMANS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MIDDLE AGED; OBSERVER VARIATION; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 22144446448     PISSN: 09387994     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00330-005-2664-6     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Heywang SH, Wolf A, Pruss E, Hilbertz T, Eiermann W, Permanetter W (1989) MR imaging of the breast with Gd-DTPA: Use and limitations. Radiology 171:95-103
2. Kaiser WA, Zeitler E (1989) MR imaging of the breast: Fast imaging sequences with and without Gd-DTPA. Preliminary observations. Radiology 170:681-686 1:STN:280:BiaC38bjt1M%3D
3. Stomper PC, Herman S, Klippenstein DL et al (1995) Suspect breast lesions: Findings at dynamic gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging correlated with mammographic and pathologic features. Radiology 197:387-395 1:STN:280:BymD38jpsVM%3D
4. Nunes LW, Schnall MD, Orel SG et al. (1997) Breast MR imaging: interpretation model. Radiology 202:833-841
5. Liu PF, Debatin JF, Caduff RF, Kacl G, Garzoli E, Krestin GP (1998) Improved diagnostic accuracy in dynamic contrast enhanced MRI of the breast by combined quantitative and qualitative analysis. Br J Radiol 71:501-509
6. Kuhl CK, Mielcareck P, Klaschik S et al (1999) Dynamic breast MR imaging: Are signal intensity time course data useful for differential diagnosis of enhancing lesions? Radiology 211:101-110 1:STN:280:DyaK1M3gsFCmtQ%3D%3D
7. Baum F, Fischer U, Vosshenrich R, Grabbe E (2002) Classification of hypervascularized lesions in CE MR imaging of the breast. Eur Radiol 12:1087-1092 10.1007/s00330-001-1213-1
8. Obdeijn IM, Kuijpers TJ, van Dijk P, Wiggers T, Oudkerk M (1996) MR lesion detection in a breast cancer population. J Magn Reson Imaging 6:849-854
9. Lee C.H. Smith R.C Levine J.A. Troiano R.N. Tocino I. 1999 Clinical usefulness of MR imaging of the breast in the evaluation of the problematic mammogram. Am J Roentgenol 173 1323-1329
10. Weinstein SP, Orel SG, Heller R et al. (2001) MR imaging of the breast in patients with invasive lobular carcinoma. Am J Roentgenol 176:399-406
11. Orel SG, Schnall MD, Powell CM et al. (1995) Staging of suspected breast cancer: Effect of MR imaging and MR-guided biopsy. Radiology 196:115-122 1:STN:280:ByqA3cvgtFU%3D
12. Fischer U, Kopka L, Grabbe E (1999) Breast carcinoma: Effect of preoperative contrast-enhanced MR imaging on the therapeutic approach. Radiology 213:881-888 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c%2Fls1OnsQ%3D%3D
13. Muuller RD, Barkhausen J, Sauerwein W, Langer R (1998) Assessment of local recurrence after breast-conserving therapy with MRI. J Comput Assist Tomogr 22:408-412 10.1097/00004728-199805000-00011
14. Viehweg P, Heinig A, Lampe D, Buchmann J, Heywang-Kobrunner SH (1998) Retrospective analysis for evaluation of the value of contrast-enhanced MRI in patients treated with breast conservative therapy. Magma 7:141-152
15. Morris EA, Schwartz LH, Dershaw DD, van Zee KJ, Abramson AF, Liberman L (1997) MR imaging of the breast in patients with occult primary breast carcinoma. Radiology 205:437-440
16. Heywang-Kobrunner SH, Huynh AT, Viehweg P, Hanke W, Requardt H, Paprosch I (1994) Prototype breast coil for MR-guided needle localization. J Comput Assist Tomogr 18:876-881
17. Orel SG, Schnall MD, Newman RW, Powell CM, Torosian MH, Rosato EF (1994) MR imaging-guided localization and biopsy of breast lesions: Initial experience. Radiology 193:97-102
18. Kuhl C.K. Morakkabati N. Leutner C.C. Schmiedel A. Wardelmann E. Schild H.H. 2001 MR imaging-guided large-core (14-gauge) needle biopsy of small lesions visible at breast MR imaging alone. Radiology 220 31-39
19. Ojala R, Sequeiros RB, Klemola R, Vanhala E, Jyrkinen L, Tervonen O (2002) MR-guided bone biopsy - preliminary report of a new guiding method. J Magn Reson Imaging 15:82-86 10.1002/jmri.10041
20. Sittek H, Perlet C, Herrman K, Linsmeier E, Kolem H, Untch M, Kessler M, Reiser M (1997) MR mammography. Preoperative marking of non-palpable breast lesions with the magnetom open at 0.2 T. Radiologe 37:685-691 10.1007/s001170050269
21. Palosaari K, Tervonen O (2002) Post-processing water-fat imaging technique for fat suppression in a low-field MR imaging system, evaluation in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Magma 15 1-9
22. Landis JR, Koch GG (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33:159-174 1:STN:280:CSiC3srhvFI%3D
23. Orel SG, Schnall MD (2001) MR imaging of the breast for the detection, diagnosis and staging of breast cancer. Radiology 220:13-30
24. Sardanelli F, Iozelli A, Fausto A (2003) MR imaging of the breast: indications, established technique and new directions. Eur Radiol 13(Suppl 3):N28-N36
25. Vomweg TW, Teifke A, Kunz RP, Hintze C, Hlawatsch A, Kern A, Kreitner KF, Thelen M (2004) Combination of low and high resolution sequences in two orientations for dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI of the breast: More than a compromise. Eur Radiol 14:1732-1742 10.1007/s00330-004-2428-8
26. Reinikainen H, Paakko E, Suramo I, Paivansalo M, Jauhiainen J, Rissanen T (2002) Dynamics of contrast enhancement in MR imaging and power Doppler ultrasonography of solid breast lesions. Acta Radiol 43:492-500 10.1034/j.1600-0455.2002.430509.x
27. Hittmair K, Turetschek K, Gomiscek G, Stiglblauer R, Schurawitzki H (1996) Field strength dependence of MRI contrast enhancement: Phantom measurements and application to dynamic breast imaging. Br J Radiol 69:215-220