Food consumption behavior of socioeconomic groups for private labels and national brands

Food Quality and Preference

Volumn 16, Issue 7, 2005, Pages 621-631

  Akbay, Cuma ^a   Jones, Eugene ^b  

^a KAHRAMANMARAS SUTCU IMAM UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^b OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

AIDS and LA AIDS model; Demand; Lower income and higher income consumers; National brands; Private labels; Shopper

Indexed keywords

EID: 22144435140     PISSN: 09503293     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2005.01.005     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Akbay C. 2000 An empirical analysis of consumption patterns for socioeconomic groups: An application of Almost Ideal Demand System. Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation, Ohio State University.
2. G.M. Allenby & P.E. Rossi Quality perceptions and asymmetric switching between brands Marketing Science 10 1991 185-204
3. F. Asche & C.R. Wessells On price indices in the Almost Ideal Demand System American Journal of Agricultural Economics 79 4 1997 1182-1185
4. G. Baltas Determinants of store brand choice: A behavioral analysis Journal of Product and Brand Management 6 5 1997 340-351
5. R. Batra & I. Sinha Consumer-level factors moderating the success of PL brands Journal of Retailing 76 2 2000 175-191
6. Binkley J.K. & Connor J.M. 1996 Market competition and metropolitan-area grocery prices, working paper no. 44. A Joint USDA Land Grant University Research Project. N.E.-165. Private Strategies Public Policies & Food Performance.
7. R. Blattberg R. Briesch & E. Fox How promotions work Marketing Science 14 3 1995 G122-G132
8. A. Buse & W.H.C. Chan Invariance, price indices and estimation in Almost Ideal Demand Systems Empirical Economics 25 2000 519-539
9. Chern W. 1999 Demand for food and demand for health: Some methodological issues. The Taipei International Conference on Health Economics Taipei Taiwan March 25-26.
10. K.W. Clements & L.W. Johnson The demand for beer, wine, and spirits: A systemwide analysis Journal of Business 56 3 1983 273-304
11. R.W. Cotterill & W.P. Putsis Market share and price setting behavior for PLs and NBs Review of Industrial Organization 17 2000 17-39
12. R.W. Cotterill & W.P. Putsis Do models of vertical strategic interaction for national and store brands meet the market test? Journal of Retailing 77 2001 83-109
13. Cotterill R.W. Putsis W.P. & Dhar R. 1999 Assessing the competitive interaction between PLs and NBs. Food Marketing Policy Center Research Report No. 44. Research Report Series. University of Connecticut Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics.
14. Cotterill R.W. Putsis W.P. & Dhar R. 2000 Market share and price setting behavior for PLs and NBs Food Marketing Policy Center Research Report No. 51s. Research Report Series. University of Connecticut Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics.
15. A. Deaton & J. Muellbauer An Almost Ideal Demand System American Economic Review 70 1980 312-326
16. E. Denitto No end to march of PL Advertising Age 11 November 1 1993 5-6
17. A. Dick A. Jain & P. Richardson How consumers evaluate store brands Pricing Strategy and Practice 5 1 1997 18-24
18. J.A. Garretson D. Fisher & S. Burton Antecedents of PL attitude and NBs promotion attitude: Similarities and differences Journal of Retailing 78 2002 91-99
19. R.D. Green & J.M. Alston Elasticities in AIDS models AJAE 72 1990 442-445
20. Greene G.M. & Park J.L. 1998 Retail demand for whole vs. low-fat milk: New perspectives on loss leader pricing. AAEA annual meeting, Salt Lake City, UT.
21. L. Guerrero Y. Colomer M.D. Guardia J. Xicola & R. Clotet Consumer attitude towards store brands Food Quality and Preference 11 2000 387-395
22. S.J. Hoch How should national brands think about private labels Sloan Management Review(Winter) 1996 89-102
23. S.J. Hoch & S. Banerji When do PLs succeed? Sloan Management Review 22 (Summer) 1993 57-67
24. Hoch S.J. & Lodish L.M. 1998 Store brands and category management. Research Paper Marketing Department Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania.
25. Hoch S.J. Montgomery A.L. & Park Y.H. 2002 Why private labels show long-term market share evaluations. Paper presented at Applied Social Sciences Association annual meeting Atlanta GA.
26. IRI 1998 Annual report. Information Resources Inc.
27. Kaufman P.R. MacDonald J.M. Lutz S.M. & Smallwood D.M. 1997 Do the poor pay more for food? Item selection and price differences affect low-income household food costs. Economic Research Service USDA AER-759.
28. KPMG 1999 Consumer loyalty and private label products. Global Consumer Markets.
29. G. Moschini Units of measurement and the stone price index in demand system estimation AJAE 77 1 1995 63-68
30. T.T. Nagel & R.K. Holden The strategy and tactics of pricing 2002 Prentice Hall Upper Saddle River, NJ
31. K. Pauwels & S. Srinivasan Who benefits from store brand entry? Marketing Science 23 3 2004 364-390
32. Putsis W.P. & Cotterill R.W. 2000 Share, price and category expenditure-geographic market effects and PLs. Food Marketing Policy Center Research Report No. 50. Research Report Series. University of Connecticut Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics.
33. J. Quelch & D. Harding Brands versus private labels: Fighting to win Harvard Business Review 74 1 1996 99-101
34. Sayman S. Hoch S.J. & Raju J.S. 2001 Positioning of store brands, working paper. Department of Marketing, The Wharton School University of Pennsylvania.
35. Sayman S. & Raju J.S. 2003 How category characteristics affect the number of store brands offered by the retailer: A model and empirical analysis. EURO-INFORMS joint meeting Istanbul July 6-10 2003.
36. M. Schnabel Store products give name brands run for their money Roanoke Times and World News March 13 1996 B.8
37. Sethuraman R. 2000 What makes consumers pay more for national brands than for store brands: Image or quality working paper. MSI report no: 00-110.
38. R. Sethuraman & C. Cole Factors influencing the price premiums that consumers pay for national brands over store brands Journal of Product and Brand Management 8 4 1999 340-351
39. R. Sethuraman & G.J. Tellis An analysis of the tradeoff between advertising and price discounting Journal of Marketing Research 28 1991 160-174
40. A. Shocker R.K. Srivastava & R.W. Ruekert Challenges and opportunities facing brand management: An introduction to the special issue Journal of Marketing Research 31 1994 149-165
41. R. Stone Linear expenditure systems and demand analysis: An application to the pattern of British demand Economic Journal 64 1954 511-527
42. Steiner R.L. 2002 The nature and benefits of national brand/private brand competition, working paper. Presented at annual meeting of the American Economic Association at Atlanta Georgia.
43. Tyagi R.K. & Raju J.S. 1998 The effect of entrant brand's ownership on national brand positioning strategies, working paper Graduate School of Management University of California Irvine.