Simultaneous inversion of shear wave splitting observations from seismic arrays

Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth

Volumn 110, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 1-12

  Ryberg, Trond ^a   Rumpker G ^a,b   Haberland, C ^a   Stromeyer, D ^a   Weber, M ^a  

^a GFZ GERMAN RESEARCH CENTRE FOR GEOSCIENCES   (Germany)

^b GOETHE UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

PLATE MOTION; SEISMIC WAVE; WAVE SPLITTING;

EID: 21844474070     PISSN: 21699313     EISSN: 21699356     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1029/2004JB003303     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Alsina, D., and R. Snieder (1995), Small-scale sublithopsheric continental mantle deformation: Constraints from SKS splitting observations, Geophys. J. Int., 123, 431-448.
2. Blackman, D. K., J.-M. Kendall, P. R. Dawson, H.-R. Wenk, D. Boyce, and J. Phipps Morgan (1996), Teleseismic imaging of subaxial flow at mid-ocean ridges: Travel-time effects of anisotropic mineral texture in the mantle, Geophys. J. Int., 127, 415-426.
3. Bock, G., R. Kind, A. Rudloff, and G. Asch (1998), Shear wave anisotropy in the upper mantle beneath the Nazca plate in northern Chile, J. Geophys. Res., 103, 24,333-24,345.
4. Brechner, S., K. Klinge, F. Krüger, and T. Plenefisch (1998), Backazimuthal variations of splitting parameters of teleseismic SKS -phases observed at the broadband stations in Germany, Pure Appl. Geophys., 151, 305-331.
5. Carroll, D. L. (1996), Chemical laser modeling with genetic algorithm, Am. Inst. Aeron. Astron. J., 34(2), 338-346.
6. Charbonneau, P. (2002), An introduction to genetic algorithms for numerical optimization, NCAR Tech. Note NCAR/TN-450+IA, High Altitude Obs., Natl. Cent. for Atmos. Res., Boulder, Colo.
7. DESERT Group (2004), The crustal structure of the Dead Sea Transform, Geophys. J. Int., 156, doi:10.1111/j.1365-246X.2004.02,143.x.
8. Fischer, K. M., E. M. Parmentier, A. R. Stine, and E. R. Wolf (2000), Modeling anisotropy and plate-driven flow in the Tonga subduction zone back arc, J. Geophys. Res., 105, 16,181-16,191.
9. Fouch, M. J., K. M. Fischer, E. M. Parmentier, M. E. Wysession, and T. J. Clarke (2000), Shear-wave splitting, continental keels, and patterns of mantle flow, J. Geophys. Res., 105, 6255-6275.
10. Goldberg, D. E. (1989), Genetic Algorithms in Search, Optimization, and Machine Learning, Addison-Wesley, Boston, Mass.
11. Haberland, C., A. Agnon, R. El-Kelani, N. Maercklin, I. Qabbani, G. Rümpker, T. Ryberg, F. Scherbaum, and M. Weber (2003), Modeling of seismic guided waves at the Dead Sea transform, J. Geophys. Res., 108 (B7), 2342, doi:10.1029/2002JB002309.
12. Hall, C. E., K. M. Fischer, E. M. Parmentier, and D. K. Blackman (2000), The influence of plate motion on three dimensional back arc mantle flow and shear wave splitting, J. Geophys. Res., 105, 28,009-28,033.
13. Hartog, R., and S. Y. Schwartz (2000), Subduction-induced strain in the upper mantle east of the Mendocino triple junction, California, J. Geophys. Res., 105, 7909-7930.
14. Hartog, R., and S. Y. Schwartz (2001), Depth-dependent mantle anisotropy below the San Andreas Fault system: Apparent splitting parameters and waveforms, J. Geophys. Res., 106, 4155-4167.
15. Hofstetter, R., and G. Bock (2004), Shear-wave velocity structure of the Sinai subplate from receiver function analysis, Geophys. J. Int., 158 (1), 67-84.
16. Holland, J. (1975), Adaption in Natural and Artificial Systems, Univ. of Mich. Press, Ann Arbor.
17. Huang, W. C., F. J. Ni, F. Tilmann, D. Nelson, J. Guo, W. Zhao, J. Mechie, R. Kind, J. Saul, R. Rapine, and T. H. Hearn (2000), Seismic polarization anisotropy beneath the central Tibetan Plateau, J. Geophys. Res., 105, 27,979-27,989.
18. Jolliffe, I. T. (1986), Principal Component Analysis, Springer, New York.
19. Marson-Pidgeon, K., and M. K. Savage (1997), Frequency-dependent anisotropy in Wellington, New Zealand, Geophys. Res. Lett., 24, 3297-3300.
20. Mathias, K., D. Whitley, C. Stork, and T. Kusuma (1994), Staged hybrid genetic algorithm search for seismic data imaging, in Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Evolutionary Computation, vol. 1, pp. 356-361, Inst. of Electr. Eng., New York.
21. Nelder, J., and R. Mead (1965), A simplex method for function minimization, Comput. J., 7, 308-313.
22. Polet, J., and H. Kanamori (2002), Anisotropy beneath California: Shear wave splitting measurements using a dense broadband array, Geophys. J. Int., 149, 313-327.
23. Polet, J., P. G. Silver, S. Beck, T. Wallace, G. Zandt, S. Ruppert, R. Kind, and A. Rudloff (2000), Shear wave anisotropy beneath the Andes from the BANJO, SEDA, and PISCO experiments, J. Geophys. Res., 105, 6287-6304.
24. Press, W. H., S. A. Teukolsky, W. T. Vetterling, and B. P. Flannery (1992), Numerical Recipes in FORTRAN - The Art of Scientific Computing, Cambridge Univ. Press, New York.
25. Rümpker, G., and T. Ryberg (2000), New "Fresnel-zone" estimates for shear-wave splitting observations from finite-difference modeling, Geophys. Res. Lett., 27, 2005-2008.
26. Rümpker, G., and P. G. Silver (1998), Apparent shear-wave splitting parameters in the presence of vertically-varying anisotropy, Geophys. J. Int., 135, 790-800.
27. Rümpker, G., T. Ryberg, G. Bock, and DESERT Seismology Group (2003), Boundary-layer mantle flow under the Dead Sea transform fault inferred from seismic anisotropy, Nature, 425, 497-501.
28. Russo, R. M., and P. G. Silver (1994), Trench-parallel flow beneath the Nazca plate from seismic anisotropy, Science, 263, 1105-1111.
29. Savage, M. K. (1999), Seismic anisotropy and mantle deformation: What have we learned from shear wave splitting, Rev. Geophys., 37, 65-106.
30. Silver, P. G., and M. K. Savage (1994), The interpretation of shear-wave splitting parameters in the presence of two anisotropic layers, Geophys. J. Int., 119, 949-963.
31. Swan, A. R. H., and M. Sandilands (1995), Introduction to Geological Data Analysis, Blackwell Sci., Malden, Mass.
32. Walker, K. T., G. H. R. Bokelmann, S. L. Klemperer, E. Gashawbeza, and A. Nyblade (2005), Shear-wave splitting around hot spots: evidence for upwelling related mantle flow, Geophys. J. Int., in press.