Five psychometric scales for online measurement of the quality of human-computer interaction in Web Sites

International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction

Volumn 18, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 309-322

  Van Schaik, Paul ^a   Ling, Jonathan ^a  

^a TEESSIDE UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCESSIBILITY; PSYCHOMETRY; SITE EVALUATION; SURVEY DATA;

FUNCTIONS; INTERFACES (COMPUTER); PSYCHOLOGY COMPUTING; RELIABILITY; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; USABILITY ENGINEERING; WEBSITES;

HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION;

EID: 21844465684     PISSN: 10447318     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1207/s15327590ijhc1803_4     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Ahuja, J., & Webster, J. (2001). Perceived disorientation: An examination of a new measure to assess web design effectiveness. Interacting with Computers, 14, 5-29.
2. Buchanan, T. (2000). Potential of the Internet for personality research. In M. Birnbaum (Ed.), Psychological experiments on the Internet (pp. 121-140). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
3. Chen, H., Wigand, R., & Nilan, M. (1999). Optimal experience of web activities. Computers in Human Behavior, 15, 585-608.
4. Cockburn, A., & McKenzie, B. (2001). What do web users do? An empirical analysis of web use. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 54, 903-922.
5. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
6. Davidov, A. (2002). Computer screens are not like paper: Typography on the web. In R. Sassoon (Ed.), Computers and typography 2 (pp. 21-41). Bristol, England: Intellect.
7. Davis, F., Bagozzi, R., & Warshaw, P. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science, 35, 982-1003.
8. Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13, 318-340.
9. Davis, S., & Wiedenbeck, S. (2001). The mediating effects of intrinsic motivation, ease of use and usefulness perceptions on performance in first-time and subsequent computer users. Interacting with Computers, 13, 549-580.
10. Ingraham, B., & Bradburn, E. (2003). Converting OLF materials for use online: Multi-PALIO: A case study. London: Open Learning Foundation.
11. Kirakowski, J. (1996). The software usability measurement inventory: Background and usage. In P. Jordan, B. Thomas, B. Weerdmeester, & I. McClelland (Eds.), Usability evaluation in industry (pp. 169-177). London: Taylor & Francis.
12. Kirakowski, J., & Cierlik, B. (1998). Measuring the usability of web sites. In Proceedings of the 42th Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Conference. Retrieved February 13, 2005, from ftp://ftp.ucc.ie/hfrg/wammi/ hfes98Q.rtf
13. Kitajima, M., Blackmon, M. H., & Poison, P.G. (2000). A comprehension-based model of web navigation and its application to web usability analysis. In S. McDonald, Y. Waern, & G. Cockton (Eds.), People and Computers XIV-Usability or Else! (Proceedings of HCI 2000; pp. 357-373). London: Springer.
14. Landauer, T. K. (1995). The trouble with computers. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
15. Larson, K., & Czerwinski, M. (1998). Web page design: Implications of memory, structure and scent for information retrieval. In M. E. Atwood, C.-M. Karat, A. Lund, J. Coutaz, & J. Karat (Eds.), Proceedings of CHI 1998 (pp. 25-32). New York: ACM Press.
16. Lewis, J. (2002). Psychometric evaluation of the PSSUQ using data from five years of usability testing. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 14, 463-488.
17. Lindgaard, G., & Dudek, C. (2003). What is this evasive beast called user satisfaction? Interacting with Computers, 15, 429-452.
18. List, D. (2001). Screenreading. Retrieved May 7, 2003, from http://www.dennislist.net/scread.html
19. Moneta, G., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1996). The effect of perceived challenges and skills on the quality of subjective experience. Journal of Personality, 64, 275-310.
20. Nielsen, J. (2001, February 4). Are users stupid? The difference between intranet and Internet design [Column posted on the World Wide Web]. Retrieved November 27, 2002, from http://www.useit.com/alertbox/20010204.html
21. Powell, T. A. (1998). Web site engineering. London: Prentice Hall.
22. Tractinsky, N., Katz, A. S., & Ikar, D. (2000). What is beautiful is usable. Interacting with Computers, 13, 127-145.
23. van Schaik, P., & Ling, J. (2003a). The effect of link colour on information retrieval in educational intranet use. Computers in Human Behavior, 19, 553-564.
24. van Schaik, P., & Ling, J. (2003b). The effects of screen ratio and context on information retrieval in web pages. Displays, 24, 187-195.
25. van Schaik, P., & Ling, J. (2003c). Using online surveys to measure three key constructs of the quality of human-computer interaction in web sites: Psychometric properties and implications. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 59, 545-567.
26. van Schaik, P., Price, A., Porritt, F., & Tilley, J. (2003). Usability testing of a library web site using think-aloud and computer-controlled methods. Unpublished manuscript.
27. Vogt, W. (1999). Dictionary of statistics and methodology. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.