A new one-step dental flowable composite for orthodontic use: An in vitro bond strength study

Angle Orthodontist

Volumn 75, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 672-677

  Tecco, Simona ^a,b   Traini, Tonino ^b   Caputi, Sergio ^b   Festa, Felice ^b   De Luca, Valentina ^b   D'Attilio, Michele ^b  

^a Department of Oral Sciences ^*  (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CHIETI   (Italy)

Author keywords

Flowable composite; Orthodontic brackets; Shear bond strength

Indexed keywords

STAINLESS STEEL;

ARTICLE; CHEMICAL BINDING; COMPOSITE MATERIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEVICE; ENAMEL; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; ORTHODONTICS; PREMOLAR TOOTH; SHEAR FLOW; STRENGTH; VISCOSITY;

EID: 21644465477     PISSN: 00033219     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Newman GV. Epoxy adhesive for orthodontic attachments: progress report. Am J Orthod. 1965;51:901-912.
2. Elaut J, Asscherickx K, Vande Vannet B, Wehrbein H. Flowable composites for bonding lingual retainers. J Clin Orthod. 2002;36:597-598.
3. Bayne SC, Taylor DF, Heymann HO. Protection hypothesis for composite wear. Dent Mater. 1992;8:305-309.
4. Tecco S, Traini T, Tetè S, Di Iorio D, D'Attilio M. Shear bond strength, bond failure and SEM analysis of a new flowable composite for orthodontic use: comparison with a traditional composite resin. Angle Orthod. In press.
5. Wang WN, Meng CL. A study of bond strength between light- and self-cured orthodontic resin. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1992;101:350-354.
6. Harari D, Aunni E, Gillis I, Redlich M. A new multipurpose dental adhesive for orthodontic use: an in vitro bond strength study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2000;118:307-310.
7. Årtun J, Bergland S. Clinical trials with crystal growth conditioning as an alternative to acid-etch enamel pretreatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1984;85:333-340.
8. Lalani N, Foley TF, Voth R, Banting D, Mamandras AH. Polymerization with the argon laser: curing time and shear bond strength. Angle Orthod. 1999;69:525-534.
9. Barkmeier WW, Erickson RL. Shear bond strength of composite to enamel and dentin using Scotchbond Multi-Purpose. Am J Dent. 1994;7:175-179.
10. Bishara SE, Gordan VV, VonWald, Olason ME. Effect of an acidic primer on shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1998;114:243-247.
11. Reynolds JR, Von Fraunhofer JA. Direct bonding of orthodontic attachments to the teeth: the relation of adhesive bond strength to gauze mesh size. Br J Orthod. 1976;3:91-95.
12. Reynolds IR. A review of direct orthodontic bonding. Br J Orthod. 1975;2:171-178.
13. Bishara SE, Olsen ME, Damon P, Jakobson JR. Evaluation of a new light-cured orthodontic bonding adhesive. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1998;114:80-87.
14. Meehan PM, Foley TF, Mamandras AH. A comparison of the shear bond strengths of two glass ionomer cements. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1999;115:125-132.
15. Willems G, Carels CEL, Verbene G. In vitro peel/shear bond strength of orthodontic adhesives. J Dent. 1997;25:263-270.
16. Rock WP, Abdullah MSB. Shear bond strengths produced by composite and compomer light cured orthodontic adhesives. J Dent. 1997;25:243-249.
17. Sinha PK, Nanda RS, Duncanson MG, Hosier MJ. In vitro evaluation of matrix-bound fluoride-releasing orthodontic bonding adhesives. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1997;111:276-282.
18. Tang ATH, Bjrkman L, Adamczak E, Andlin-Sobocki A, Ekstrand J. In vitro shear bond strength of orthodontic bondings without liquid resin. Acta Odontol Scand. 2000;58:44-48.
19. Rix D, Foley TF, Mamandras A. Comparison of bond strength of three adhesives: composite resin, hybrid GIC and glass-filled GIC. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2001;119:36-42.