Female responses to male coos in the collared dove Streptopelia decaocto

Behaviour

Volumn 139, Issue 10, 2002, Pages 1287-1302

  Secondi, Jean ^a,b   De Bakker, Merijn A G ^a   Ten Cate, Carel ^a  

^a LEIDEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b LUND UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0036822011     PISSN: 00057959     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1163/156853902321104163     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Andersson, M. (1994). Sexual selection. - Princeton, Princeton University Press.
2. Birkhead, T.R. & Møller, A.P. (1992). Sperm competition in birds. - Evolutionary causes and consequences. Academic Press, NY.
3. Buchanan, K. & Catchpole C.K. (2000). Song as an indicator of male parental effort in the sedge warbler. - Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 267, p. 321-326.
4. ten Cate, C., Slabbekoorn, H. & Ballintijn, M.R. (2002). Birdsong and male-male competition: causes and consequences of vocal variability in the collared dove (Streptopelia decaocto). - Adv. Study Behav. 31, p. 31-74.
5. Catchpole, C.K., Dittami, J. & Leisler, B. (1984). Differential responses to male song repertoire in female songbirds implanted with estradiol. - Nature 312, p. 563-565.
6. _ & Slater, P.J.B. (1995). Bird song biological: themes and variations. - Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
7. Cheng, M.-F. (1985). Female cooing promotes ovarian development in ring doves. - Physiol. Behav. 37, p. 371-374.
8. _ (1992). From whom does the female dove coo? A case for the role of vocal-self stimulation. - Anim. Behav. 43, p. 1035-1044.
9. Cynx, J. (1995). Similarities in absolute and relative pitch perception in songbirds (starling and zebra finch) and a non songbird (pigeon). - J. Comp. Psychol. 109, p. 261-267.
10. Endler, J.A. & Basolo, A.L. (1998). Sensory ecology, receiver biases and sexual selection. - Trends Ecol. Evol. 13, p. 415-420.
11. Friedman, M.B. (1977). Interactions between visual and vocal courtship stimuli in the neuroendocrine response of female doves. - J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol. 91, p. 1408-1416.
12. Gentner, T.Q. & Hulse, S.H. (2000). Female European starling preference and choice for variation in conspecific male song. - Anim. Behav. 59, p. 443-458.
13. Gil, D. & Slater, P.J.B. (2000). Multiple song repertoire characteristics in the willow warbler (Phylloscopus trochilus): correlations with female choice and offspring viability. - Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 47, p. 319-326.
14. Goodson, J.L. & Adkins-Regan, E. (1997). Playbacks of crows of male Japanese quail elicits female phonotaxis. - Condor 99, p. 990-993.
15. Goodwin, D. (1983). Pigeons and doves of the world. - British Museum of Natural History, London.
16. Greene, E., Lyon, B.E., Muehler, V.R., Ratcliffe, L., Oliver, S.J. & Boag, P.T. (2000). Disruptive sexual selection for plumage coloration in a passerine bird. - Nature 407, p. 1000-1003.
17. Griffiths, R., Double, M.C., Orr, K. & Dawson, R.J.G. (1998). A DNA test to sex most birds. - Mol. Ecol. 7, p. 1071-1075.
18. Hasselquist, D., Bensch, S. & von Schantz, T. (1996). Correlation between male song repertoire, extrapair paternity and offspring survival in the great reed warbler. - Nature 381, p. 229-232.
19. Irwin, D.E. & Price, T. (1999). Sexual imprinting, learning and speciation. - Heredity 82, p. 347-354.
20. Jarvis, E.D., Ribeiro, S., da Silva, M.L., Ventura, D., Vieillard, J. & Mello, C.V. (2000). Behaviourally driven gene expression reveals song nuclei in hummingbird brains. - Nature 406, p. 629-632.
21. Kahn, N.W., St. John, J. & Quinn, T.W. (1998). Chromosome-specific intron size differences in the avian CHD gene provide an efficient method for sex identification in birds. - Auk 115, p. 1074-1078.
22. de Kort, S.R. & ten Cate, C. (2001). Response to interspecific vocalizations is affected by degree of phylogenetic relatedness in Streptopelia doves. - Anim. Behav. 61, p. 239-247.
23. Kreutzer, M. & Brémond, J.-C. (1986). The additive effects of the syntax and syllable shape during species recognition in the winter wren Troglodytes troglodytes. - Can. J. Zool. 64, p. 1241-1244.
24. Lessells, C.M. & Boag, P.T. (1987). Unrepeatable repeatibilities: a common mistake. - Auk 104, p. 116-121.
25. Lott, D.F. & Brody, P.N. (1966). Support of ovulation in the ring dove by auditory and visual stimuli. - J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol. 62, p. 311-313.
26. Moore, M.C. (1983). Effect of female sexual displays on the endocrine physiology and behaviour of male white-crowned sparrows, Zonotrichia leucophrys. - J. Zool. 199, p. 137-148.
27. Neubauer, R.L. (2000). Super-normal length song preferences of female zebra finches (Taenopygia guttata) and a theory of the evolution of bird song. - Evol. Ecol. 13, p. 365-380.
28. Ratcliffe, L. & Otter, K. (1996). Sex difference in song recognition. - In: Ecology and evolution of acoustic communication in birds (D.E. Kroodsma & E.H. Miller, eds). Cornell university Press, Ithaca, p. 339-355.
29. Rehsteiner, U., Geisser H. & Reyer, H.-U. (1998). Singing and mating success in water pipits: one specific song element makes all the difference. - Anim. Behav. 55, p. 1471-1481.
30. Riebel, K. (2000). Early exposure leads to repeatable preferences for male song in female zebra finches. - Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 267, p. 2553-2558.
31. _ & Slater, P.J.B. (1998). Testing female chaffinch song preferences by operant conditioning. - Anim. Behav. 56, p. 1443-1453.
32. Saetre, G.P., Kral, M. & Bures, S. (1997). Differential species recognition abilities of males and females in a flycatcher hybrid zone. - J. Av. Biol. 28, 259-263.
33. Searcy, W.A. (1992). Measuring response of female birds to male song. - In: Playback and studies of animal communication. (P.K. McGregor, ed.). New York, Plenum Press, p. 175-190.
34. Secondi, J., den Hartog, P.M. & ten Cate, C. (in press). To trill or not to trill? Temporal response to a heterospecific trait in male collared doves, Streptopelia decaocto. - Behav. Ecol.
35. Slabbekoorn, H. & ten Cate, C. (1996). Responses of collared doves to playback of coos. - Behav. Process. 38, p. 169-174.
36. Sokal, R.R. & Rohlf, F.J. (1995). Biometry. - New York, W.H. Freeman and Co.
37. Vallet, E., Beme, I. & Kreutzer, M. (1998). Two-notes syllables in canary songs elicit high levels of sexual display. - Anim. Behav. 55, p. 291-297.
38. Walsh, P.S., Metzger, D.A. & Higuchi, R. (1991). Chelex 100 as a medium for simple extraction of DNA for PCR-based typing from forensic material. - BioTechniques 10, p. 506-513.
39. Wiens, J.J. (2001). Widespread loss of sexually selected traits: how the peacock lost its spots. - Trends Ecol. Evol. 16, p. 517-523.
40. Yamaguchi, A. (1999). Auditory experience does not shape sexual preferences for songs in female northern cardinals. - Behaviour 136, p. 309-329.