Sphincter defects are not associated with long-term incontinence following ileal pouch-anal anastomosis

Diseases of the Colon and Rectum

Volumn 48, Issue 7, 2005, Pages 1410-1415

  Gearhart, Susan L ^a   Hull, Tracy L ^b   Schroeder, Tom ^b   Church, James ^b   Floruta, Crina ^b  

^a DEPARTMENT OF PATHOLOGY   (United States)

^b LERNER RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

Anal sphincter; Fecal incontinence; Ileal pouch anal anastomosis; Restorative proctocolectomy; Ulcerative colitis

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANORECTAL PRESSURE; ANUS SPHINCTER DISORDER; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; FECES INCONTINENCE; FEMALE; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; ILEORECTAL ANASTOMOSIS; LONG TERM CARE; PROCTOCOLECTOMY; QUALITY OF LIFE; RECTOUTERINE POUCH; REVIEW; TIME SERIES ANALYSIS; ULCERATIVE COLITIS;

ADULT; ANAL CANAL; ANASTOMOSIS, SURGICAL; FECAL INCONTINENCE; FEMALE; HUMANS; MANOMETRY; MIDDLE AGED; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PROCTOCOLECTOMY, RESTORATIVE; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; QUALITY OF LIFE; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC;

EID: 21644437589     PISSN: 00123706     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10350-004-0950-z     Document Type: Review

References (17)

1. F Michelassi J Lee M Rubin 2003 Long-term functional results after ileal pouch anal restorative proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis Ann Surg 238 433 41
2. S Holubar N Hyman 2003 Continence alterations after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis do not diminish quality of life Dis Colon Rectum 46 1489 91
3. V Fazio P Tekkis F Remzi 2003 Quantification of risk for pouch failure after ileal pouch anal anastomosis surgery Ann Surg 238 605 17
4. C Delaney V Fazio F Remzi 2003 Prospective, age-related analysis of surgical results, functional outcome, and quality of life after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis Ann Surg 238 221 8
5. R Farouk J Pemberton B Wolff R Dozois S Browning D Larson 2000 Functional outcomes after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for chronic ulcerative colitis Ann Surg 23 919 26
6. M Oberwalder J Connor S Wexner 2003 Meta-analysis to determine the incidence of obstetric anal sphincter damage Br J Surg 90 1333 7
7. A Sultan M Kamm C Hudson J Thomas C Bartram 1993 Anal-sphincter disruption during vaginal delivery N Engl J Med 329 1905 11
8. I Nygaard S Ral J Dawson 1997 Anal incontinence after anal sphincter disruption: a 30-year retrospective cohort study Obstet Gynecol 89 896 901
9. A Halverson T Hull F Remzi J Hammel T Schroeder V Fazio 2002 Perioperative resting pressure predicts long-term postoperative function after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis J Gastrointest Surg 6 316 21
10. H Liberman J Faria CA Ternent GJ Blatchford MA Christensen AG Thorson 2001 A prospective evaluation of the value of anorectal physiology in the management of fecal incontinence Dis Colon Rectum 44 1567 74
11. A Bharucha 2004 Outcome measures for fecal incontinence: anorectal structure and function Gastroenterology 126 S90 8
12. TH Rockwood 2004 Incontinence severity and QOL scales for fecal incontinence Gastroenterology 126 S106 13
13. F Remzi E Gorun J Bast 2004 Vaginal delivery after pouch anal anastomosis (IPAA): A word of caution Dis Colon Rectum 222 120
14. V Fazio Y Ziv J Church 1995 Ileal pouch-anal anastomoses complications and function in 1005 patients Ann Surg 222 120 7
15. A Lepisto P Luukkonen H Jarvinen 2002 Cumulative failure rate of ileal pouch-anal anastomosis and quality of life after failure Dis Colon Rectum 45 1289 94
16. Y Ziv V Fazio J Church 1996 Stapled ileal pouch-anal anastomoses are safer than handsewn anastomoses in patients with ulcerative colitis Am J Surg 171 320 3
17. F Remzi J Church J Bast 2001 Mucosectomy vs. stapled ileal pouch-anal anastomosis in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis: functional outcome and neoplasia control Dis Colon Rectum 44 1590 6