Perioperative resting pressure predicts long-term postoperative function after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis

Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery

Volumn 6, Issue 3, 2002, Pages 316-321

  Halverson, Amy L ^a   Hull, Tracy L ^a,b   Remzi, Feza ^a   Hammel, Jeffery P ^a   Schroeder, Tom ^a   Fazio, Victor W ^a   Orkin, B A ^b   Kelly, Keith A ^b  

^a LERNER RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

^b Department of Colorectal Surgery ^*

Author keywords

Anastomosis; Function; Ileal pouch; Incontinence; Manometry

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ANASTOMOSIS; ANORECTAL PRESSURE; ANUS SPHINCTER; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIET RESTRICTION; ENERGY; FECES; FECES INCONTINENCE; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; HEALTH; HUMAN; ILEUM POUCH ANAL ANASTOMOSIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MANOMETRY; OUTCOMES RESEARCH; PATIENT INFORMATION; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PERIOPERATIVE PERIOD; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PREDICTION; PREOPERATIVE PERIOD; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRE; REST; SCHOOL CHILD; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; SURGICAL PATIENT; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TIME; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VALIDATION PROCESS; WORK; ANAL CANAL; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PREDICTION AND FORECASTING; PRESSURE; PROCTOCOLECTOMY; SURGICAL STAPLING;

ANAL CANAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MANOMETRY; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PRESSURE; PROCTOCOLECTOMY, RESTORATIVE; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; QUALITY OF LIFE; SURGICAL STAPLING; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 15944380707     PISSN: 1091255X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1091-255X(01)00072-5     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Fazio VW, Ziv Y, Church JM, Oakley JR, Lavery IC, Milsom JW, Schroeder TK. Ileal pouch-anal anastomoses complications and function in 1005 patients. Ann Surg 1995;222:120-127.
2. McIntyre PB, Pemberton JH, Wolff BG, Dozois RR, Beart RW Jr. Indeterminate colitis. Long-term outcome in patients after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. Dis Colon Rectum 1995;38:51-54.
3. Seidel SA, Peach SE, Newman M, Sharp KW. Ileoanal pouch procedures: Clinical outcomes and quality-of-life assessment. Am Surg 1999;65:40-46.
4. Pemberton JH, Kelly KA, Beart RW Jr, Dozois RR, Wolff BG, Ilstrup DM. Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for chronic ulcerative colitis. Long-term results. Ann Surg 1987;206:504-513.
5. Stelzner M, Fonkalsrud EW. Assessment of anorectal function after mucosal proctectomy and endorectal ileal pull-through for ulcerative colitis. Surgery 1990;107:201-208.
6. Marcello PW, Roberts PL, Schoetz DJ, Coller JA, Murray JJ, Veidenheimer MC. Long-term results of the ileoanal pouch procedure. Arch Surg 1993;128:500-504.
7. Meagher AP, Farouk R, Dozois RR, Kelly KA, Pemberton JH. J ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for chronic ulcerative colitis: Complications and long-term outcome in 1310 patients. B J Surg 1998;85:800-803.
8. Fazio VW, O'Riordain MG, Lavery IC, Church JM, Lau P, Strong SA, Hull T. Long-term functional outcome and quality of life after stapled restorative proctocolectomy. Ann Surg 1999;230:575-586.
9. Goes R, Beart RW Jr. Physiology of ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. Current concepts. Dis Colon Rectum 1995;38: 996-1005.
10. Nasmyth DG, Johnston D, Godwin PG, Dixon MF, Smith A, Williams NS. Factors influencing bowel function after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. B J Surg 1986;73:469-473.
11. Nicholls RJ, Belliveau P, Neill M, Wilks M, Tabaqchali S. Restorative proctocolectomy with ileal reservoir: A pathophysiological assessment. Gut 1981;22:462-468.
12. O'Connell PR, Stryker SJ, Metcalf AM, Pemberton JH, Kelly KA. Anal canal pressure and motility after ileoanal anastomosis. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1988;166:47-54.
13. Heppell J, Taylor BM, Beart RW Jr, Dozois RR, Kelly KA. Predicting outcome after endorectal ileoanal anastomosis. Can J Surg 1983;26:132-134.
14. Ferrara A, Pemberton JH, Grotz RL, Hanson RB. Motor determinants of incontinence after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. B J Surg 1994;81:285-288.
15. Scott NA, Pemberton JH, Barkel DC, Wolff BG. Anal and ileal pouch manometric measurements before ileostomy closure are related to functional outcome after ileal pouchanal anastomosis. B J Surg 1989;76:613-616.
16. Steens J, Meijerink WJ, Masclee AA, van Hogezand RA, Griffioen G, Post WJ, Bemelman WA. Limited influence of pouch function on quality of life after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. Hepatogastroenterology 2000;47:746-750.
17. Morgado PJ Jr, Wexner SD, James K, Nogueras JJ, Jagelman DG. Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis: Is preoperative anal manometry predictive of postoperative functional outcome? Dis Colon Rectum 1994;37:224-228.
18. Ko CY, Rusin LC, Schoetz DJ Jr, Moreau L, Coller JA, Murray JJ, Roberts PL, Arnell TD. Does better functional result equate with better quality of life? Implications for surgical treatment in familial adenomatous polyposis. Dis Colon Rectum 2000;43:829-837.
19. Becker JM. Anal sphincter function after colectomy, mucosal proctectomy and endorectal ileaoanal pull-through. Arch Surg 1984;119:526-531.
20. Church JM, Saad R, Schroeder T, Fazio VW, Lavery IC, Oakley JR, Milsom JW, Tuckson W. Predicting the functional result of anastomoses to the anus: The paradox of preoperative anal resting pressure. Dis Colon Rectum 1993; 36:895-900.