Use of Fluorescent Dextran Conjugates as a Long-Term Marker of Osteogenic Neural Crest in Frogs

Developmental Dynamics

Volumn 230, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 100-106

  Gross, Joshua B ^a   Hanken, James ^a  

^a HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Amphibian; Cranial neural crest; Fate map; Lineage marker; Xenopus

Indexed keywords

BIOCHEMICAL MARKER; DEXTRAN; FLUORESCENT DYE;

AMPHIBIA; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; BONE CELL; BRAIN NERVE CELL; CARTILAGE CELL; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELL FATE; CELL LABELING; CELL LINEAGE; CELL POPULATION; CELL TYPE; CONJUGATE; CONTROLLED STUDY; EMBRYO DEVELOPMENT; FROG; HATCHING; IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY; MELANOCYTE; METAMORPHOSIS; MULTIPOTENT STEM CELL; NEURAL CREST; NEURAL CREST CELL; NONHUMAN; OSTEOBLAST; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SKULL; TECHNIQUE; XENOPUS LAEVIS;

ANIMALS; BIOLOGICAL MARKERS; CELL DIVISION; CELL LINEAGE; DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY; DEXTRANS; EMBRYO; FLUORESCENT DYES; MICROSCOPY, FLUORESCENCE; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; NEURAL CREST; OSTEOGENESIS; TIME FACTORS; XENOPUS LAEVIS;

AMPHIBIA; ANURA; VERTEBRATA; XENOPUS LAEVIS;

EID: 2142810225     PISSN: 10588388     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/dvdy.20036     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Andres G. 1949. Untersuchungen an chimaeren von Triton und Bombinator. Genetica 24:387-534.
2. Borchers A, Epperlein HH, Wedlich D. 2000. An assay system to study migratory behavior of cranial neural crest cells in Xenopus. Dev Genes Evol 210:217-222.
3. Carl TF, Vourgourakis Y, Klymkowsky M, Hanken J. 2000. Green fluorescent protein used to assess cranial neural crest derivatives in the frog, Xenopus laevis. In: Jacobson C-O, editor. Regulatory processes in development. London: Portland Press. p 167-172.
4. Chibon P. 1967. Nuclear labeling by tritiated thymidine of neural crest derivatives in the amphibian Pleurodeles waltlii. J Embryol Exp Morphol 18:343-358.
5. Clarke JD, Tickle C. 1999. Fate maps old and new. Nat Cell Biol 1:E103-E109.
6. Collazo A, Bronner-Fraser M, Fraser SE. 1993. Vital dye labelling of Xenopus laevis trunk neural crest reveals multipotency and novel pathways of migration. Development 118:363-376.
7. Couly GF, Coltey PM, Le Douarin NM. 1993. The triple origin of skull in higher vertebrates: a study in quail-chick chimeras. Development 117:409-429.
8. Cox WG, Hemmati-Brivanlou A. 1995. Caudalization of neural fate by tissue recombination and bFGF. Development 121:4349-4358.
9. de Beer GR. 1947. The differentiation of neural crest cells into visceral cartilages and odontoblasts in Amblystoma, and a re-examination of the germ-layer theory. Proc R Soc Lond 134B:377-398.
10. Delarue M, Saez FJ, Johnson KE, Boucaut JC. 1997. Fates of the blastomeres of the 32-cell stage Pleurodeles waltlii embryo. Dev Dyn 210:236-248.
11. Donlach T, Musci TJ. 1995. Induction of anteroposterior neural pattern in Xenopus: evidence for a quantitative mechanism. Mech Dev 53:403-413.
12. Hörstadius S. 1950. The neural crest: its properties and derivatives in the light of experimental research. London: Oxford University Press. 111 p.
13. Jiang X, Iseki S, Maxson RE, Sucov HM, Morriss-Kay GM. 2002. Tissue orlgins and interactions in the mammalian skull vault. Dev Biol 241:106-116.
14. Kaneko T, Saeki K, Lee T, Mizuno N. 1996. Improved retrograde axonal transport and subsequent visualization of tetramethylrhodamine (TMR) -dextran amine by means of an acidic injection vehicle and antibodies against TMR. J Neurosci Methods 65:157-165.
15. Knouff RA. 1935. The developmental pattern of ectodermal placodes in Rana pipiens. J Comp Neurol 62:17-71.
16. Krotoski DM, Fraser SE, Bronner-Fraser M. 1988. Mapping of neural crest pathways in Xenopus laevis using inter- and intra-specific cell markers. Dev Biol 127:119-132.
17. Landacre FL. 1921. The fate of the neural crest in the head of Urodeles. J Comp Neurol 33:1-43.
18. Langille RM, Hall BK. 1986. Evidence of cranial neural crest contribution to the skeleton of the sea lamprey, Petromyzon marinus. Prog Clin Biol Res 217B:263-266.
19. Langille RM, Hall BK. 1988. Role of the neural crest in development of the cartilaginous cranial and visceral skeleton of the medaka, Oryzias latipes (Teleostel). Anat Embryol (Berl) 177:297-305.
20. Le Douarin N, Barq G. 1969. Use of Japanese quail cells as "biological markers" in experimental embryology. C R Acad Sci Hebd Seances Acad Sci D 269:1543-1546.
21. Le Douarin NM, Kalcheim C. 1999. The neural crest. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 445 p.
22. Le Lievre CS. 1978. Participation of neural crest-derived cells in the genesis of the skull in birds. J Embryol Exp Morphol 47:17-37.
23. Morriss-Kay GM. 2001. Derivation of the mammalian skull vault. J Anat 199:143-151.
24. Nieuwkoop PD, Faber J. 1994. Normal table of Xenopus laevis (Daudin). New York, London: Garland Publishing, Inc. 252 p.
25. Noden DM. 1978. The control of avian cephalic neural crest cytodifferentiation. I. Skeletal and connective tissues. Dev Biol 67:296-312.
26. Nordlander RH. 1993. Cellular and subcellular distribution of HNK-1 immunoreactivity in the neural tube of Xenopus. J Comp Neurol 335:538-551.
27. Olsson L, Hanken J. 1996. Cranial neural-crest migration and chondrogenic fate in the oriental fire-bellied toad Bombina orientalis: defining the ancestral pattern of head development in anuran amphibians. J Morphol 229:105-120.
28. Olsson L, Moury DJ, Carl TF, Håstad O, Hanken J. 2002. Cranial neural crest-cell migration in the direct-developing frog, Eleutherodactylus coqui: molecular heterogeneity within and among migratory streams. Zoology 105:3-13.
29. Presnell JK, Schreibman MP. 1997. Humason's animal tissue techniques. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press. 572 p.
30. Sadaghiani B, Thlébaud CH. 1987. Neural crest development in the Xenopus laevis embryo, studied by interspecific transplantation and scanning electron microscopy. Dev Biol 124:91-110.
31. Santagati F, Rijli FM. 2003. Cranial neural crest and the building of the vertebrate head. Nat Rev Neurosci 4:806-818.
32. Schneider RA. 1999. Neural crest can form cartilages normally derived from mesoderm during development of the avian head skeleton. Dev Biol 208:441-455.
33. Selleck MA, Stern CD. 1991. Fate mapping and cell lineage analysis of Hensen's node in the chick embryo. Development 112:615-626.
34. Sive HL, Grainger RM, Harland RM. 2000. Early Development of Xenopus laevis. Cold Spring Harbor, New York: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press. 338 p.
35. Stone LS. 1926. Further experiments on the extirpation and transplantation of mesectoderm in Amblystoma punctatum. J Exp Zool 44:95-131.
36. Trueb L, Hanken J. 1992. Skeletal development in Xenopus laevis (Anura: Pipidae). J Morphol 214:1-41.
37. Tucker GC, Aoyama H, Lipinski M, Tursz T, Thiery JP. 1984. Identical reactivity of monoclonal antibodies HNK-1 and NC-1: conservation in vertebrates on cells derived from the neural primordium and on some leukocytes. Cell Differ 14:223-230.
38. Wagner G. 1949. Die Bedeutung der Neuralleiste fur die Kopfgestaltung der Amphibien-larven. Untersuchungen an Chimaeren von Triton. Rev Suisse Zool 56:519-620.
39. Wagner G. 1959. Untersuchungen an Bombinator-Triton-chimaeren. Das skellet larvaler Triton-kopfe mit Bombinator mesektoderm. Wilhelm Roux Arch Dev Biol 151:136-158.