Do Individual Attendings' Post-rotation Performance Ratings Detect Residents' Clinical Performance Deficiencies?

Academic Medicine

Volumn 79, Issue 5, 2004, Pages 453-457

  Schwind, Cathy J ^a   Williams, Reed G ^a   Boehler, Margaret L ^a   Dunnington, Gary L ^a  

^a SOUTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; BEHAVIOR; CLINICAL PRACTICE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DECISION MAKING; EDUCATION PROGRAM; HUMAN; JOB PERFORMANCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE; RATING SCALE; RESIDENCY EDUCATION; REVIEW; SKILL; VALIDATION PROCESS;

EID: 2142755861     PISSN: 10402446     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00001888-200405000-00016     Document Type: Review

References (14)

1. Kwolek CJ, Donnelly MB, Sloan DA, Birrell SN, Strodel WE, Schwartz RW. Ward evaluations: should they be abandoned? J Surg Res. 1997;69:1-6.
2. Yao DC, Wright SM. National survey of internal medicine residency program directors regarding problem residents. JAMA. 2000; 284:1099-104.
3. Day RP, Hewson MG, Kindy P Jr, Van Kirk J. Evaluation of resident performance in an outpatient internal medicine clinic using standardized patients. J Gen Intern Med. 1993;8: 193-8.
4. Scheuneman AL, Carley JP, Baker WH. Residency evaluations. Are they worth the effort? Arch Surg. 1994;129:1067-73.
5. Tonesk X, Buchanan RG. An AAMC pilot study by 10 medical schools of clinical evaluation of students. J Med Educ. 1987;62: 707-18.
6. Magarian GJ, Mazur DJ. A national survey of grading systems used in medicine clerkships. Acad Med. 1990;65:636-9.
7. Magarian GJ, Mazur DJ. Evaluation of students in medicine clerkships. Acad Med. 1990;65:341-5.
8. Williams RG, Klamen DA, McGaghie WC. Cognitive, social and environmental sources of bias in clinical competence ratings. Teach Learn Med. 2003;15:270-92.
9. Tesser A, Rosen S. The reluctance to transmit bad news. In: Berkowitz L (ed). Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 8. New York: Academic Press, 1975;193-232.
10. Harris MM, Smith DE, Champagne D. A field study of performance appraisal purpose: research versus administrative-based ratings. Personnel Psychol. 1995;48:151-60.
11. Waldman DA, Thornton OC. A field study of rating conditions and leniency in performance appraisal. Psychol Rep. 1988;63: 835-40.
12. Bretz RD, Milkovich GT, Read W. The current state of performance appraisal research and practice: concerns, directions, and implications. J Manag. 1992;18:321-52.
13. Speer AJ, Solomon DJ, Ainsworth MA. An innovative evaluation method in an internal medicine clerkship. Acad Med. 1996;71: S76-8.
14. Hemmer PA, Hawkins R, Jackson JL, Pangaro LN. Assessing how well three evaluation methods detect deficiencies in medical students' professionalism in two settings of an internal medicine clerkship. Acad Med. 2000; 75:167-73.